These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35754620)

  • 21. Examining rating scales using Rasch and Mokken models for rater-mediated assessments.
    Wind SA
    J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(2):100-32. PubMed ID: 24950531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Incorporating Criterion Ratings Into Model-Based Rater Monitoring Procedures Using Latent-Class Signal Detection Theory.
    Patterson BF; Wind SA; Engelhard G
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Sep; 41(6):472-491. PubMed ID: 29881101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluating Rater Accuracy in Rater-Mediated Assessments Using an Unfolding Model.
    Wang J; Engelhard G; Wolfe EW
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Dec; 76(6):1005-1025. PubMed ID: 29795898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A Bayesian many-facet Rasch model with Markov modeling for rater severity drift.
    Uto M
    Behav Res Methods; 2023 Oct; 55(7):3910-3928. PubMed ID: 36284065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Measurement Properties of Outcome Measures Used to Assess Physical Impairments in Patients After Distal Radius Fracture: A Systematic Review.
    Ziebart C; Mehta SP; MacDermid J
    Phys Ther; 2021 Jun; 101(6):. PubMed ID: 33647944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Inter-rater variability as mutual disagreement: identifying raters' divergent points of view.
    Gingerich A; Ramlo SE; van der Vleuten CPM; Eva KW; Regehr G
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2017 Oct; 22(4):819-838. PubMed ID: 27651046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Can physician examiners overcome their first impression when examinee performance changes?
    Wood TJ; Pugh D; Touchie C; Chan J; Humphrey-Murto S
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 Oct; 23(4):721-732. PubMed ID: 29556923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Differences in inter-rater reliability and accuracy for a treatment adherence scale.
    Wu SM; Whiteside U; Neighbors C
    Cogn Behav Ther; 2007; 36(4):230-9. PubMed ID: 18049948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A mixture Rasch facets model for rater's illusory halo effects.
    Jin KY; Chiu MM
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Dec; 54(6):2750-2764. PubMed ID: 35018607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Development of a Performance Monitoring Instrument for Rating Explosives Search Dog Performance.
    Rooney NJ; Clark CCA
    Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():545382. PubMed ID: 34169102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Detecting and measuring rater effects using many-facet Rasch measurement: part I.
    Myford CM; Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(4):386-422. PubMed ID: 14523257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessing the quality of evidence in studies estimating prevalence of exposure to occupational risk factors: The QoE-SPEO approach applied in the systematic reviews from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related burden of disease and Injury.
    Pega F; Momen NC; Gagliardi D; Bero LA; Boccuni F; Chartres N; Descatha A; Dzhambov AM; Godderis L; Loney T; Mandrioli D; Modenese A; van der Molen HF; Morgan RL; Neupane S; Pachito D; Paulo MS; Prakash KC; Scheepers PTJ; Teixeira L; Tenkate T; Woodruff TJ; Norris SL
    Environ Int; 2022 Mar; 161():107136. PubMed ID: 35182944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Taking Rater Exposure to Trainees Into Account When Explaining Rater Variability.
    Boscardin CK; Wijnen-Meijer M; Cate OT
    J Grad Med Educ; 2016 Dec; 8(5):726-730. PubMed ID: 28018538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A method for identifying extreme OSCE examiners.
    Bartman I; Smee S; Roy M
    Clin Teach; 2013 Feb; 10(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 23294740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bias in psychotherapist ratings of client transference and insight.
    Markin RD; Kivlighan DM
    Psychotherapy (Chic); 2007 Sep; 44(3):300-15. PubMed ID: 22122257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Modeling rater diagnostic skills in binary classification processes.
    Lin X; Chen H; Edwards D; Nelson KP
    Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(4):557-571. PubMed ID: 29094378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Examining rater and occasion influences in observational assessments obtained from within the clinical environment.
    Kreiter CD; Wilson AB; Humbert AJ; Wade PA
    Med Educ Online; 2016; 21():29279. PubMed ID: 26925540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparative analysis of the ratings in performance assessment using generalizability theory and the many-facet Rasch model.
    Kim SC; Wilson M
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(4):408-23. PubMed ID: 19934528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain: The overlooked issue of rater selection in psychotherapy observer ratings.
    Ezawa ID; Bartels GC; Pfeifer BJ; Strunk DR
    Psychother Res; 2021 Apr; 31(4):548-556. PubMed ID: 32552478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accuracy of performance-test linking based on a many-facet Rasch model.
    Uto M
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Aug; 53(4):1440-1454. PubMed ID: 33169286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.