154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35754832)
1. Optimizing the Construction and Update Strategies for the Genomic Selection of Pig Reference and Candidate Populations in China.
Wei X; Zhang T; Wang L; Zhang L; Hou X; Yan H; Wang L
Front Genet; 2022; 13():938947. PubMed ID: 35754832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of Genomic Selection for Important Economic Traits of Cashmere and Meat Goats Assessed by Simulation Study.
Yan X; Zhang T; Liu L; Yu Y; Yang G; Han Y; Gong G; Wang F; Zhang L; Liu H; Li W; Yan X; Mao H; Li Y; Du C; Li J; Zhang Y; Wang R; Lv Q; Wang Z; Zhang J; Liu Z; Wang Z; Su R
Front Vet Sci; 2022; 9():770539. PubMed ID: 35372544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Genomic selection in a pig population including information from slaughtered full sibs of boars within a sib-testing program.
Samorè AB; Buttazzoni L; Gallo M; Russo V; Fontanesi L
Animal; 2015 May; 9(5):750-9. PubMed ID: 25510405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impacts of genotyping strategies on long-term genetic response in genomic selection.
Nishio M; Satoh M
Anim Sci J; 2014 May; 85(5):511-6. PubMed ID: 24506177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of selective genotyping strategies for prediction of breeding values in a population undergoing selection.
Boligon AA; Long N; Albuquerque LG; Weigel KA; Gianola D; Rosa GJ
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(13):4716-22. PubMed ID: 23372045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimizing genomic reference populations to improve crossbred performance.
Wientjes YCJ; Bijma P; Calus MPL
Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Nov; 52(1):65. PubMed ID: 33158416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of enlarging the reference population with (un)genotyped animals on the accuracy of genomic selection in dairy cattle.
Pszczola M; Mulder HA; Calus MP
J Dairy Sci; 2011 Jan; 94(1):431-41. PubMed ID: 21183054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact of genotyping strategy on the accuracy of genomic prediction in simulated populations of purebred swine.
Li X; Zhang Z; Liu X; Chen Y
Animal; 2019 Sep; 13(9):1804-1810. PubMed ID: 30616709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Genomic prediction ability for beef fatty acid profile in Nelore cattle using different pseudo-phenotypes.
Chiaia HLJ; Peripolli E; de Oliveira Silva RM; Feitosa FLB; de Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Olivieri BF; Espigolan R; Tonussi RL; Gordo DGM; de Albuquerque LG; de Oliveira HN; Ferrinho AM; Mueller LF; Kluska S; Tonhati H; Pereira ASC; Aguilar I; Baldi F
J Appl Genet; 2018 Nov; 59(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 30251238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population.
Pszczola M; Strabel T; Mulder HA; Calus MP
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jan; 95(1):389-400. PubMed ID: 22192218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Persistence of accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values over generations in layer chickens.
Wolc A; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Preisinger R; Habier D; Fernando R; Garrick DJ; Dekkers JC
Genet Sel Evol; 2011 Jun; 43(1):23. PubMed ID: 21693035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genotyping strategies for genomic selection in small dairy cattle populations.
Jiménez-Montero JA; González-Recio O; Alenda R
Animal; 2012 Aug; 6(8):1216-24. PubMed ID: 23217224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs.
König S; Swalve HH
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5292-303. PubMed ID: 19762847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of genomic predictions for carcass and reproduction traits in Berkshire, Duroc and Yorkshire populations in Korea.
Iqbal A; Choi TJ; Kim YS; Lee YM; Zahangir Alam M; Jung JH; Choe HS; Kim JJ
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci; 2019 Nov; 32(11):1657-1663. PubMed ID: 31480201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of marker density and population structure on the genomic prediction accuracy for growth trait in Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei.
Wang Q; Yu Y; Yuan J; Zhang X; Huang H; Li F; Xiang J
BMC Genet; 2017 May; 18(1):45. PubMed ID: 28514941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of genotyping different groups of animals on accuracy when moving from traditional to genomic selection.
Pszczola M; Strabel T; van Arendonk JAM; Calus MPL
J Dairy Sci; 2012 Sep; 95(9):5412-5421. PubMed ID: 22916948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genomic prediction of crossbred performance based on purebred Landrace and Yorkshire data using a dominance model.
Esfandyari H; Bijma P; Henryon M; Christensen OF; Sørensen AC
Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):40. PubMed ID: 27276993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The efficiency of genome-wide selection for genetic improvement of net merit.
Togashi K; Lin CY; Yamazaki T
J Anim Sci; 2011 Oct; 89(10):2972-80. PubMed ID: 21512116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of genotyped cows in the reference population on the genomic evaluation of Holstein cattle.
Uemoto Y; Osawa T; Saburi J
Animal; 2017 Mar; 11(3):382-393. PubMed ID: 27515004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
