154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35754832)
21. Response to genomic selection: the Bulmer effect and the potential of genomic selection when the number of phenotypic records is limiting.
Van Grevenhof EM; Van Arendonk JA; Bijma P
Genet Sel Evol; 2012 Aug; 44(1):26. PubMed ID: 22862849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Genomic selection for maternal traits in pigs.
Lillehammer M; Meuwissen TH; Sonesson AK
J Anim Sci; 2011 Dec; 89(12):3908-16. PubMed ID: 21841086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A study of Genomic Prediction across Generations of Two Korean Pig Populations.
Castro Dias Cuyabano B; Wackel H; Shin D; Gondro C
Animals (Basel); 2019 Sep; 9(9):. PubMed ID: 31514411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: progress and challenges.
Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AJ; Goddard ME
J Dairy Sci; 2009 Feb; 92(2):433-43. PubMed ID: 19164653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters.
Muir WM
J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):342-55. PubMed ID: 18076471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Genotyping more cows increases genetic gain and reduces rate of true inbreeding in a dairy cattle breeding scheme using female reproductive technologies.
Thomasen JR; Liu H; Sørensen AC
J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jan; 103(1):597-606. PubMed ID: 31733861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Efficiency of genomic selection in a purebred pig male line.
Tribout T; Larzul C; Phocas F
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4164-76. PubMed ID: 22859761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Genetic parameters and purebred-crossbred genetic correlations for growth, meat quality, and carcass traits in pigs.
Esfandyari H; Thekkoot D; Kemp R; Plastow G; Dekkers J
J Anim Sci; 2020 Dec; 98(12):. PubMed ID: 33325519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Pooled genotyping strategies for the rapid construction of genomic reference populations1.
Alexandre PA; Porto-Neto LR; Karaman E; Lehnert SA; Reverter A
J Anim Sci; 2019 Dec; 97(12):4761-4769. PubMed ID: 31710679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Genomic selection for two traits in a maternal pig breeding scheme.
Lillehammer M; Meuwissen TH; Sonesson AK
J Anim Sci; 2013 Jul; 91(7):3079-87. PubMed ID: 23658351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Multi-generational imputation of single nucleotide polymorphism marker genotypes and accuracy of genomic selection.
Toghiani S; Aggrey SE; Rekaya R
Animal; 2016 Jul; 10(7):1077-85. PubMed ID: 27076192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations.
Hayes BJ; Bowman PJ; Chamberlain AC; Verbyla K; Goddard ME
Genet Sel Evol; 2009 Nov; 41(1):51. PubMed ID: 19930712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Accuracy of genome-enabled prediction exploring purebred and crossbred pig populations.
Veroneze R; Lopes MS; Hidalgo AM; Guimarães SE; Silva FF; Harlizius B; Lopes PS; Knol EF; M van Arendonk JA; Bastiaansen JW
J Anim Sci; 2015 Oct; 93(10):4684-91. PubMed ID: 26523561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Updating the reference population to achieve constant genomic prediction reliability across generations.
Pszczola M; Calus MP
Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):1018-24. PubMed ID: 26711815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reduction in accuracy of genomic prediction for ordered categorical data compared to continuous observations.
Kizilkaya K; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Jun; 46(1):37. PubMed ID: 24912924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. From phenotyping towards breeding strategies: using in vivo indicator traits and genetic markers to improve meat quality in an endangered pig breed.
Biermann AD; Yin T; König von Borstel UU; Rübesam K; Kuhn B; König S
Animal; 2015 Jun; 9(6):919-27. PubMed ID: 25690016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Improving production efficiency in the presence of genotype by environment interactions in pig genomic selection breeding programmes.
Nirea KG; Meuwissen TH
J Anim Breed Genet; 2017 Apr; 134(2):119-128. PubMed ID: 27990697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Enlarging a training set for genomic selection by imputation of un-genotyped animals in populations of varying genetic architecture.
Pimentel EC; Wensch-Dorendorf M; König S; Swalve HH
Genet Sel Evol; 2013 Apr; 45(1):12. PubMed ID: 23621897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Genotype imputation from various low-density SNP panels and its impact on accuracy of genomic breeding values in pigs.
Grossi DA; Brito LF; Jafarikia M; Schenkel FS; Feng Z
Animal; 2018 Nov; 12(11):2235-2245. PubMed ID: 29706144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Development of genomic predictions for Angus cattle in Brazil incorporating genotypes from related American sires.
Campos GS; Cardoso FF; Gomes CCG; Domingues R; de Almeida Regitano LC; de Sena Oliveira MC; de Oliveira HN; Carvalheiro R; Albuquerque LG; Miller S; Misztal I; Lourenco D
J Anim Sci; 2022 Feb; 100(2):. PubMed ID: 35031806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
