These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35754832)

  • 61. Which Individuals To Choose To Update the Reference Population? Minimizing the Loss of Genetic Diversity in Animal Genomic Selection Programs.
    Eynard SE; Croiseau P; Laloë D; Fritz S; Calus MPL; Restoux G
    G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Jan; 8(1):113-121. PubMed ID: 29133511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The impact of training on data from genetically-related lines on the accuracy of genomic predictions for feed efficiency traits in pigs.
    Aliakbari A; Delpuech E; Labrune Y; Riquet J; Gilbert H
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Oct; 52(1):57. PubMed ID: 33028194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Balanced selection on purebred and crossbred performance increases gain in crossbreds.
    Esfandyari H; Berg P; Sørensen AC
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Mar; 50(1):8. PubMed ID: 29566647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Efficiency of multi-breed genomic selection for dairy cattle breeds with different sizes of reference population.
    Hozé C; Fritz S; Phocas F; Boichard D; Ducrocq V; Croiseau P
    J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(6):3918-29. PubMed ID: 24704232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Predicted accuracy of and response to genomic selection for new traits in dairy cattle.
    Calus MP; de Haas Y; Pszczola M; Veerkamp RF
    Animal; 2013 Feb; 7(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 23031684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Genomic selection for fruit quality traits in apple (Malus×domestica Borkh.).
    Kumar S; Chagné D; Bink MC; Volz RK; Whitworth C; Carlisle C
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(5):e36674. PubMed ID: 22574211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Genomic evaluation and genome-wide association studies for total number of teats in a combined American and Danish Yorkshire pig populations selected in China.
    Fang F; Li J; Guo M; Mei Q; Yu M; Liu H; Legarra A; Xiang T
    J Anim Sci; 2022 Jul; 100(7):. PubMed ID: 35553682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Genotype Imputation to Improve the Cost-Efficiency of Genomic Selection in Rabbits.
    Mancin E; Sosa-Madrid BS; Blasco A; Ibáñez-Escriche N
    Animals (Basel); 2021 Mar; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 33805619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Genomic selection in dairy cattle simulated populations.
    Seno LO; Guidolin DGF; Aspilcueta-Borquis RR; Nascimento GBD; Silva TBRD; Oliveira HN; Munari DP
    J Dairy Res; 2018 May; 85(2):125-132. PubMed ID: 29785919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Controlling bias in genomic breeding values for young genotyped bulls.
    Tsuruta S; Lourenco DAL; Masuda Y; Misztal I; Lawlor TJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Nov; 102(11):9956-9970. PubMed ID: 31495630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Genomic selection for the improvement of meat quality in beef.
    Pimentel EC; König S
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Oct; 90(10):3418-26. PubMed ID: 22665643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Comparison of genomic predictions for lowly heritable traits using multi-step and single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in Holstein cattle.
    Guarini AR; Lourenco DAL; Brito LF; Sargolzaei M; Baes CF; Miglior F; Misztal I; Schenkel FS
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 Sep; 101(9):8076-8086. PubMed ID: 29935829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Using genomics to enhance selection of novel traits in North American dairy cattle.
    Chesnais JP; Cooper TA; Wiggans GR; Sargolzaei M; Pryce JE; Miglior F
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Mar; 99(3):2413-2427. PubMed ID: 26778318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Prediction of the reliability of genomic breeding values for crossbred performance.
    Vandenplas J; Windig JJ; Calus MPL
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 May; 49(1):43. PubMed ID: 28499351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Effects of preselection of genotyped animals on reliability and bias of genomic prediction in dairy cattle.
    Togashi K; Adachi K; Kurogi K; Yasumori T; Tokunaka K; Ogino A; Miyazaki Y; Watanabe T; Takahashi T; Moribe K
    Asian-Australas J Anim Sci; 2019 Feb; 32(2):159-169. PubMed ID: 30056675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Validation of genomic predictions for body weight in broilers using crossbred information and considering breed-of-origin of alleles.
    Duenk P; Calus MPL; Wientjes YCJ; Breen VP; Henshall JM; Hawken R; Bijma P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Jul; 51(1):38. PubMed ID: 31286857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Genomic Selection Using Extreme Phenotypes and Pre-Selection of SNPs in Large Yellow Croaker (Larimichthys crocea).
    Dong L; Xiao S; Chen J; Wan L; Wang Z
    Mar Biotechnol (NY); 2016 Oct; 18(5):575-583. PubMed ID: 27704224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Determining the stability of accuracy of genomic estimated breeding values in future generations in commercial pig populations.
    Hollifield MK; Lourenco D; Bermann M; Howard JT; Misztal I
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Apr; 99(4):. PubMed ID: 33733277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Bias in heritability estimates from genomic restricted maximum likelihood methods under different genotyping strategies.
    Cesarani A; Pocrnic I; Macciotta NPP; Fragomeni BO; Misztal I; Lourenco DAL
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2019 Jan; 136(1):40-50. PubMed ID: 30426582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Comparing genomic prediction accuracy from purebred, crossbred and combined purebred and crossbred reference populations in sheep.
    Moghaddar N; Swan AA; van der Werf JH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):58. PubMed ID: 25927315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.