137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35758150)
1. Predicting the load constant of the revised NIOSH lifting equation based on demographics.
Ahmad S; Muzammil M
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2023 Sep; 29(3):1016-1024. PubMed ID: 35758150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficacy of the revised NIOSH lifting equation to predict risk of low-back pain associated with manual lifting: a one-year prospective study.
Lu ML; Waters TR; Krieg E; Werren D
Hum Factors; 2014 Feb; 56(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 24669544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Revised NIOSH lifting equation: a critical evaluation.
Ahmad S; Muzammil M
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2023 Mar; 29(1):358-365. PubMed ID: 35253606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modification of the Revised National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Lifting Equation to Determine the Individual Manual Lifting Risk in Malaysia's Manufacturing Industry.
Dawad NA; Yasin SM; Darus A; Jamil AT; Nyi Naing N
Cureus; 2024 Apr; 16(4):e57747. PubMed ID: 38715993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Understanding outcome metrics of the revised NIOSH lifting equation.
Fox RR; Lu ML; Occhipinti E; Jaeger M
Appl Ergon; 2019 Nov; 81():102897. PubMed ID: 31422239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The NIOSH lifting equation and low-back pain, Part 2: Association with seeking care in the backworks prospective cohort study.
Garg A; Kapellusch JM; Hegmann KT; Moore JS; Boda S; Bhoyar P; Thiese MS; Merryweather A; Deckow-Schaefer G; Bloswick D; Malloy EJ
Hum Factors; 2014 Feb; 56(1):44-57. PubMed ID: 24669542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving the risk assessment capability of the revised NIOSH lifting equation by incorporating personal characteristics.
Barim MS; Sesek RF; Capanoglu MF; Drinkaus P; Schall MC; Gallagher S; Davis GA
Appl Ergon; 2019 Jan; 74():67-73. PubMed ID: 30487111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The NIOSH lifting equation and low-back pain, Part 1: Association with low-back pain in the backworks prospective cohort study.
Garg A; Boda S; Hegmann KT; Moore JS; Kapellusch JM; Bhoyar P; Thiese MS; Merryweather A; Deckow-Schaefer G; Bloswick D; Malloy EJ
Hum Factors; 2014 Feb; 56(1):6-28. PubMed ID: 24669540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Provisional recommended weight limits for manual lifting during pregnancy.
Waters TR; MacDonald LA; Hudock SD; Goddard DE
Hum Factors; 2014 Feb; 56(1):203-14. PubMed ID: 24669554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the Impact of the Revised National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Lifting Equation.
Lu ML; Putz-Anderson V; Garg A; Davis KG
Hum Factors; 2016 Aug; 58(5):667-82. PubMed ID: 26822795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficacy of the revised NIOSH lifting equation to predict risk of low back pain due to manual lifting: expanded cross-sectional analysis.
Waters TR; Lu ML; Piacitelli LA; Werren D; Deddens JA
J Occup Environ Med; 2011 Sep; 53(9):1061-7. PubMed ID: 21866048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Recommended Weight Generates Different Spine Loads in Load-Handling Activity Performed Using Stoop, Semi-squat and Full-Squat Techniques; a Full-Body Musculoskeletal Model Study.
Dehghan P; Arjmand N
Hum Factors; 2024 May; 66(5):1387-1398. PubMed ID: 36433743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The accuracy of a 2D video-based lifting monitor.
Wang X; Hu YH; Lu ML; Radwin RG
Ergonomics; 2019 Aug; 62(8):1043-1054. PubMed ID: 31092146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the revised NIOSH lifting equation. A cross-sectional epidemiologic study.
Waters TR; Baron SL; Piacitelli LA; Anderson VP; Skov T; Haring-Sweeney M; Wall DK; Fine LJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Feb; 24(4):386-94; discussion 395. PubMed ID: 10065524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Variable Lifting Index for Manual-Lifting Risk Assessment: A Preliminary Validation Study.
Battevi N; Pandolfi M; Cortinovis I
Hum Factors; 2016 Aug; 58(5):712-25. PubMed ID: 27037305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation and quantification of manual materials handling risk factors.
Sesek R; Gilkey D; Drinkaus P; Bloswick DS; Herron R
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2003; 9(3):271-87. PubMed ID: 14577945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [A psychophysical evaluation of NIOSH Lifting Equation in a Chinese young male population: a pilot study].
Xiao GB; Liang YX
Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2008 Jun; 26(6):341-5. PubMed ID: 18771617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A cross-validation of the NIOSH limits for manual lifting.
Hidalgo J; Genaidy A; Karwowski W; Christensen D; Huston R; Stambough J
Ergonomics; 1995 Dec; 38(12):2455-64. PubMed ID: 8586075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Epidemiological and biomechanical evaluation of airline baggage handling.
Tafazzol A; Aref S; Mardani M; Haddad O; Parnianpour M
Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2016; 22(2):218-27. PubMed ID: 26654282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The relationship between low back discomfort ratings and the NIOSH lifting index.
Wang MJ; Garg A; Chang YC; Shih YC; Yeh WY; Lee CL
Hum Factors; 1998 Sep; 40(3):509-15. PubMed ID: 9849108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
