These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35759772)

  • 1. Length of Stay and 30-Day Postoperative Complications Following Minimally Invasive Apical Prolapse Repair.
    Dieter AA; Moore KJ; Willis-Gray MG; Gutman RE; Iglesia CB; Carey ET
    Urogynecology (Phila); 2022 Aug; 28(8):539-546. PubMed ID: 35759772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 30-Day unanticipated healthcare encounters after prolapse surgery: impact of same day discharge.
    Romanova AL; Carter-Brooks C; Ruppert KM; Zyczynski HM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 May; 222(5):482.e1-482.e8. PubMed ID: 31733206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Readmission and emergency department visits after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy and vaginal apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
    Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Nov; 225(5):552.e1-552.e7. PubMed ID: 34437864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Postoperative void trial failure and same-day discharge following apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a retrospective matched case-control study.
    Ross JH; Wallace SL; Ferrando CA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Jun; 34(6):1227-1233. PubMed ID: 36044062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Racial and ethnic differences in reconstructive surgery for apical vaginal prolapse.
    Boyd BAJ; Winkelman WD; Mishra K; Vittinghoff E; Jacoby VL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 225(4):405.e1-405.e7. PubMed ID: 33984303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implementation of a urogynecology-specific enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway.
    Carter-Brooks CM; Du AL; Ruppert KM; Romanova AL; Zyczynski HM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Nov; 219(5):495.e1-495.e10. PubMed ID: 29913175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term reoperation risk after apical prolapse repair in female pelvic reconstructive surgery.
    Shah NM; Berger AA; Zhuang Z; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):306.e1-306.e16. PubMed ID: 35654112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Voiding function after sacrocolpopexy versus native tissue transvaginal repair for apical pelvic organ prolapse in an ERAS era: A retrospective cohort study.
    El Haraki AS; Burns J; Crafton CL; Parker-Autry C; Matthews CA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1999-2004. PubMed ID: 34586441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A National Contemporary Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes for Vaginal Vault Prolapse: Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Nonmesh Vaginal Surgery.
    Linder BJ; Gershman B; Bews KA; Glasgow AE; Occhino JA
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2019; 25(5):342-346. PubMed ID: 30628947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Complications After Vaginal Vault Suspension Versus Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy in Women With Elevated Body Mass Index: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Data From the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.
    Stairs J; Minassian V; Clancy A
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2022 Jun; 28(6):391-396. PubMed ID: 35234179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Incidence and risk factors for venous thromboembolism events after different routes of pelvic organ prolapse repairs.
    Chong W; Bui AH; Menhaji K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):268.e1-268.e26. PubMed ID: 32413430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes, Readmission, and Reoperation for Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation, Uterosacral Ligament Suspension, and Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy.
    Yadav GS; Gaddam N; Rahn DD
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Mar; 27(3):133-139. PubMed ID: 33620894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site compared with robotic multi-port sacrocolpopexy for apical compartment prolapse.
    Matanes E; Boulus S; Lauterbach R; Amit A; Weiner Z; Lowenstein L
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 222(4):358.e1-358.e11. PubMed ID: 31589864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perioperative Complications in Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Versus Transvaginal Mesh in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Analysis of a National Multi-institutional Dataset.
    Kisby CK; Occhino JA; Bews KA; Habermann EB; Linder BJ
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Feb; 27(2):72-77. PubMed ID: 31094716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Postoperative complications and pelvic organ prolapse recurrence following combined pelvic organ prolapse and rectal prolapse surgery compared with pelvic organ prolapse only surgery.
    Wallace SL; Kim Y; Lai E; Mehta S; Gaigbe-Togbe B; Zhang CA; Von Bargen EC; Sokol ER
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug; 227(2):317.e1-317.e12. PubMed ID: 35654113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating the association of same-day discharge following minimally invasive surgery for prolapse on 30-day postoperative adverse events.
    Bretschneider CE; Luchristt D; Kenton K; Sheyn D
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Jul; 33(7):1849-1856. PubMed ID: 35066657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prolapse recurrence following sacrocolpopexy vs uterosacral ligament suspension: a comparison stratified by Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification stage.
    Lavelle ES; Giugale LE; Winger DG; Wang L; Carter-Brooks CM; Shepherd JP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 218(1):116.e1-116.e5. PubMed ID: 28951262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of 30-Day Readmission After Same-Day Compared With Next-Day Discharge in Minimally Invasive Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery.
    Berger AA; Tan-Kim J; Menefee SA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jun; 135(6):1327-1337. PubMed ID: 32459424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is Same-Day Discharge Following Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy Safe and Feasible? A National Contemporary Database Analysis.
    Raju R; Hanson KT; Habermann EB; Occhino JA; Linder BJ
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2022 Jul; 28(7):414-420. PubMed ID: 35420549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Financial analysis of minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy compared with native tissue vaginal repair with concomitant hysterectomy.
    El Haraki AS; Shepherd JP; Parker-Autry C; Matthews CA
    Int Urogynecol J; 2023 May; 34(5):1121-1126. PubMed ID: 36729164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.