237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35759849)
21. Detection of fecal bacteria and source tracking identifiers in environmental waters using rRNA-based RT-qPCR and rDNA-based qPCR assays.
Pitkänen T; Ryu H; Elk M; Hokajärvi AM; Siponen S; Vepsäläinen A; Räsänen P; Santo Domingo JW
Environ Sci Technol; 2013; 47(23):13611-20. PubMed ID: 24187936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Quantification of pathogens and markers of fecal contamination during storm events along popular surfing beaches in San Diego, California.
Steele JA; Blackwood AD; Griffith JF; Noble RT; Schiff KC
Water Res; 2018 Jun; 136():137-149. PubMed ID: 29501758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Tracking bacterial pollution at a marine wastewater outfall site - A case study from Norway.
Bagi A; Skogerbø G
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jul; 829():154257. PubMed ID: 35247400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Microbial source tracking in impaired watersheds using PhyloChip and machine-learning classification.
Dubinsky EA; Butkus SR; Andersen GL
Water Res; 2016 Nov; 105():56-64. PubMed ID: 27598696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Distribution and Differential Survival of Traditional and Alternative Indicators of Fecal Pollution at Freshwater Beaches.
Cloutier DD; McLellan SL
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 Feb; 83(4):. PubMed ID: 27940538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Fecal pollution source characterization at non-point source impacted beaches under dry and wet weather conditions.
Shrestha A; Kelty CA; Sivaganesan M; Shanks OC; Dorevitch S
Water Res; 2020 Sep; 182():116014. PubMed ID: 32622131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Probabilistic analysis showing that a combination of Bacteroides and Methanobrevibacter source tracking markers is effective for identifying waters contaminated by human fecal pollution.
Johnston C; Byappanahalli MN; Gibson JM; Ufnar JA; Whitman RL; Stewart JR
Environ Sci Technol; 2013; 47(23):13621-8. PubMed ID: 24182330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessing pathogen risk to swimmers at non-sewage impacted recreational beaches.
Schoen ME; Ashbolt NJ
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Apr; 44(7):2286-91. PubMed ID: 20201509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Performance of two quantitative PCR methods for microbial source tracking of human sewage and implications for microbial risk assessment in recreational waters.
Staley C; Gordon KV; Schoen ME; Harwood VJ
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2012 Oct; 78(20):7317-26. PubMed ID: 22885746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Microbial source tracking in a coastal California watershed reveals canines as controllable sources of fecal contamination.
Ervin JS; Van De Werfhorst LC; Murray JL; Holden PA
Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Aug; 48(16):9043-52. PubMed ID: 25055204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Toolbox Approaches Using Molecular Markers and 16S rRNA Gene Amplicon Data Sets for Identification of Fecal Pollution in Surface Water.
Ahmed W; Staley C; Sadowsky MJ; Gyawali P; Sidhu JP; Palmer A; Beale DJ; Toze S
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2015 Oct; 81(20):7067-77. PubMed ID: 26231650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Host Specificity and Sensitivity of Established and Novel Sewage-Associated Marker Genes in Human and Nonhuman Fecal Samples.
Ahmed W; Gyawali P; Feng S; McLellan SL
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2019 Jul; 85(14):. PubMed ID: 31076423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Human Fecal Contamination Corresponds to Changes in the Freshwater Bacterial Communities of a Large River Basin.
McClary-Gutierrez JS; Driscoll Z; Nenn C; Newton RJ
Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Oct; 9(2):e0120021. PubMed ID: 34494860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A Duplex Digital PCR Assay for Simultaneous Quantification of the Enterococcus spp. and the Human Fecal-associated HF183 Marker in Waters.
Cao Y; Raith MR; Griffith JF
J Vis Exp; 2016 Mar; (109):. PubMed ID: 27023488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Detection of the human specific Bacteroides genetic marker provides evidence of widespread sewage contamination of stormwater in the urban environment.
Sauer EP; Vandewalle JL; Bootsma MJ; McLellan SL
Water Res; 2011 Aug; 45(14):4081-91. PubMed ID: 21689838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of chemical, molecular, and traditional markers of fecal contamination in an effluent dominated urban stream.
Litton RM; Ahn JH; Sercu B; Holden PA; Sedlak DL; Grant SB
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Oct; 44(19):7369-75. PubMed ID: 20839837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Beach boundary layer: a framework for addressing recreational water quality impairment at enclosed beaches.
Grant SB; Sanders BF
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Dec; 44(23):8804-13. PubMed ID: 20949912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A microbial signature approach to identify fecal pollution in the waters off an urbanized coast of Lake Michigan.
Newton RJ; Bootsma MJ; Morrison HG; Sogin ML; McLellan SL
Microb Ecol; 2013 May; 65(4):1011-23. PubMed ID: 23475306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Determination of wild animal sources of fecal indicator bacteria by microbial source tracking (MST) influences regulatory decisions.
Nguyen KH; Senay C; Young S; Nayak B; Lobos A; Conrad J; Harwood VJ
Water Res; 2018 Nov; 144():424-434. PubMed ID: 30059905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Microbial source tracking of fecal pollution to coral reef lagoons of Norfolk Island, Australia.
Vanderzalm J; Currie S; Smith W; Metcalfe S; Taylor N; Ahmed W
Sci Total Environ; 2024 Feb; 912():168906. PubMed ID: 38016554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
