These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3576020)

  • 1. Robustness of the two independent samples t-test when applied to ordinal scaled data.
    Heeren T; D'Agostino R
    Stat Med; 1987; 6(1):79-90. PubMed ID: 3576020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Robustness and power of analysis of covariance applied to ordinal scaled data as arising in randomized controlled trials.
    Sullivan LM; D'Agostino RB
    Stat Med; 2003 Apr; 22(8):1317-34. PubMed ID: 12687657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robustness of the t test applied to data distorted from normality by floor effects.
    Sullivan LM; D'Agostino RB
    J Dent Res; 1992 Dec; 71(12):1938-43. PubMed ID: 1452898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Student t-tests for potentially abnormal data.
    Shuster JJ
    Stat Med; 2009 Jul; 28(16):2170-84. PubMed ID: 19326398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robustness and power of analysis of covariance applied to data distorted from normality by floor effects: homogeneous regression slopes.
    Sullivan LM; D'Agostino RB
    Stat Med; 1996 Mar; 15(5):477-96. PubMed ID: 8668873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test under scrutiny.
    Fagerland MW; Sandvik L
    Stat Med; 2009 May; 28(10):1487-97. PubMed ID: 19247980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Issues in biomedical statistics: comparing means under normal distribution theory.
    Ludbrook J
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1995 Apr; 65(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 7717947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tests of significance using regression models for ordered categorical data.
    Snapinn SM; Small RD
    Biometrics; 1986 Sep; 42(3):583-92. PubMed ID: 3567291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A closer look at the effect of preliminary goodness-of-fit testing for normality for the one-sample t-test.
    Rochon J; Kieser M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):410-26. PubMed ID: 21973094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Rotation gene set testing for longitudinal expression data.
    Dørum G; Snipen L; Solheim M; Saebø S
    Biom J; 2014 Nov; 56(6):1055-75. PubMed ID: 25243581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Generating Multivariate Ordinal Data via Entropy Principles.
    Lee Y; Kaplan D
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):156-181. PubMed ID: 29359242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of exact, mid-P, and score tests for matched case-control studies.
    Hirji KF
    Biometrics; 1991 Jun; 47(2):487-96. PubMed ID: 1912257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bias in misspecified mixtures.
    Gray G
    Biometrics; 1994 Jun; 50(2):457-70. PubMed ID: 8068845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A simple and effective decision rule for choosing a significance test to protect against non-normality.
    Zimmerman DW
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):388-409. PubMed ID: 21973093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A parametric comparison of diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic groups.
    Xiong C; van Belle G; Miller JP; Yan Y; Gao F; Yu K; Morris JC
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17763377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ordinal probability effect measures for group comparisons in multinomial cumulative link models.
    Agresti A; Kateri M
    Biometrics; 2017 Mar; 73(1):214-219. PubMed ID: 27438478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Matching using estimated propensity scores: relating theory to practice.
    Rubin DB; Thomas N
    Biometrics; 1996 Mar; 52(1):249-64. PubMed ID: 8934595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimal design of the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney-test.
    Bürkner PC; Doebler P; Holling H
    Biom J; 2017 Jan; 59(1):25-40. PubMed ID: 27243898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effect of skewness and kurtosis on the robustness of linear mixed models.
    Arnau J; Bendayan R; Blanca MJ; Bono R
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Sep; 45(3):873-9. PubMed ID: 23299397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Symmetry in square contingency tables: tests of hypotheses and confidence interval construction.
    May WL; Johnson WD
    J Biopharm Stat; 2001; 11(1-2):23-33. PubMed ID: 11459440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.