These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35760237)

  • 1. Serious reporting deficiencies exist in minimal important difference studies: current state and suggestions for improvement.
    Carrasco-Labra A; Devji T; Qasim A; Phillips M; Johnston BC; Devasenapathy N; Zeraatkar D; Bhatt M; Jin X; Brignardello-Petersen R; Urquhart O; Foroutan F; Schandelmaier S; Pardo-Hernandez H; Vernooij RW; Huang H; Rizwan Y; Siemieniuk R; Lytvyn L; Patrick DL; Ebrahim S; Furukawa TA; Nesrallah G; Schunemann HJ; Bhandari M; Thabane L; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Oct; 150():25-32. PubMed ID: 35760237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimal important difference estimates for patient-reported outcomes: A systematic survey.
    Carrasco-Labra A; Devji T; Qasim A; Phillips MR; Wang Y; Johnston BC; Devasenapathy N; Zeraatkar D; Bhatt M; Jin X; Brignardello-Petersen R; Urquhart O; Foroutan F; Schandelmaier S; Pardo-Hernandez H; Hao Q; Wong V; Ye Z; Yao L; Vernooij RWM; Huang H; Zeng L; Rizwan Y; Siemieniuk R; Lytvyn L; Patrick DL; Ebrahim S; Furukawa TA; Nesrallah G; Schünemann HJ; Bhandari M; Thabane L; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 May; 133():61-71. PubMed ID: 33321175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimal important differences for improvement in shoulder condition patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review to inform a
    Hao Q; Devji T; Zeraatkar D; Wang Y; Qasim A; Siemieniuk RAC; Vandvik PO; Lähdeoja T; Carrasco-Labra A; Agoritsas T; Guyatt G
    BMJ Open; 2019 Feb; 9(2):e028777. PubMed ID: 30787096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mind the methods of determining minimal important differences: three critical issues to consider.
    Devji T; Carrasco-Labra A; Guyatt G
    Evid Based Ment Health; 2021 May; 24(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 32839275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the credibility of anchor based estimates of minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes: instrument development and reliability study.
    Devji T; Carrasco-Labra A; Qasim A; Phillips M; Johnston BC; Devasenapathy N; Zeraatkar D; Bhatt M; Jin X; Brignardello-Petersen R; Urquhart O; Foroutan F; Schandelmaier S; Pardo-Hernandez H; Vernooij RW; Huang H; Rizwan Y; Siemieniuk R; Lytvyn L; Patrick DL; Ebrahim S; Furukawa T; Nesrallah G; Schünemann HJ; Bhandari M; Thabane L; Guyatt GH
    BMJ; 2020 Jun; 369():m1714. PubMed ID: 32499297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Credibility and Generalization of the Minimally Important Difference Concept in Dermatology: A Scoping Review.
    Speeckaert R; Belpaire A; Herbelet S; Lambert J; van Geel N
    JAMA Dermatol; 2022 Nov; 158(11):1304-1314. PubMed ID: 36044227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An extension minimal important difference credibility item addressing construct proximity is a reliable alternative to the correlation item.
    Wang Y; Devji T; Carrasco-Labra A; Qasim A; Hao Q; Kum E; Devasenapathy N; King MT; Terluin B; Terwee CB; Walsh M; Furukawa TA; Tsujimoto Y; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 May; 157():46-52. PubMed ID: 36878330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A systematic survey identified methodological issues in studies estimating anchor-based minimal important differences in patient-reported outcomes.
    Wang Y; Devji T; Qasim A; Hao Q; Wong V; Bhatt M; Prasad M; Wang Y; Noori A; Xiao Y; Ghadimi M; Lozano LEC; Phillips MR; Carrasco-Labra A; King M; Terluin B; Terwee CB; Walsh M; Furukawa TA; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2022 Feb; 142():144-151. PubMed ID: 34752937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally important difference estimates and methods: a protocol.
    Johnston BC; Ebrahim S; Carrasco-Labra A; Furukawa TA; Patrick DL; Crawford MW; Hemmelgarn BR; Schunemann HJ; Guyatt GH; Nesrallah G
    BMJ Open; 2015 Oct; 5(10):e007953. PubMed ID: 26428330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of minimal important differences in degenerative knee disease outcomes: a systematic review and case study to inform
    Devji T; Guyatt GH; Lytvyn L; Brignardello-Petersen R; Foroutan F; Sadeghirad B; Buchbinder R; Poolman RW; Harris IA; Carrasco-Labra A; Siemieniuk RAC; Vandvik PO
    BMJ Open; 2017 May; 7(5):e015587. PubMed ID: 28495818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimal important differences for fatigue patient reported outcome measures-a systematic review.
    Nordin Å; Taft C; Lundgren-Nilsson Å; Dencker A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 May; 16():62. PubMed ID: 27387456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Use in Guidelines Published by the American Academy of Ophthalmology: A Review.
    Yu CW; Nanji K; Hatamnejad A; Gemae M; Joarder I; Achunair A; Devji T; Phillips M; Zeraatkar D; Steel DH; Guymer RH; Sivaprasad S; Wykoff CC; Chaudhary V
    Ophthalmology; 2023 Nov; 130(11):1201-1211. PubMed ID: 37429499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The minimal important difference of patient-reported outcome measures related to female urinary incontinence: a systematic review.
    Barbosa-Silva J; Calixtre LB; Von Piekartz D; Driusso P; Armijo-Olivo S
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Mar; 24(1):60. PubMed ID: 38459428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally Important Differences in Patient or Proxy-Reported Outcome Studies Relevant to Children: A Systematic Review.
    Ebrahim S; Vercammen K; Sivanand A; Guyatt GH; Carrasco-Labra A; Fernandes RM; Crawford MW; Nesrallah G; Johnston BC
    Pediatrics; 2017 Mar; 139(3):. PubMed ID: 28196931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identifying the minimal important difference in patient-reported outcome measures in the field of people with severe mental illness: a pre-post-analysis of the Illness Management and Recovery Programme.
    Beentjes TAA; Teerenstra S; Vermeulen H; Goossens PJJ; der Sanden MWGN; van Gaal BGI
    Qual Life Res; 2021 Jun; 30(6):1723-1733. PubMed ID: 33594528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Cardiovascular Disease: An Evidence Map of the Psychometric Properties of Health Status Instruments.
    Chew DS; Whitelaw S; Vaduganathan M; Mark DB; Van Spall HGC
    Ann Intern Med; 2022 Oct; 175(10):1431-1439. PubMed ID: 36122377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient-reported questionnaires in MS rehabilitation: responsiveness and minimal important difference of the multiple sclerosis questionnaire for physiotherapists (MSQPT).
    van der Maas NA
    BMC Neurol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):50. PubMed ID: 28302081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Meaningful thresholds for patient-reported outcomes following interventions for anterior cruciate ligament tear or traumatic meniscus injury: a systematic review for the OPTIKNEE consensus.
    Macri EM; Young JJ; Ingelsrud LH; Khan KM; Terluin B; Juhl CB; Whittaker JL; Culvenor AG; Crossley KM; Roos EM
    Br J Sports Med; 2022 Dec; 56(24):1432-1444. PubMed ID: 35973755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for bladder cancer: a systematic review using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist.
    Mason SJ; Catto JWF; Downing A; Bottomley SE; Glaser AW; Wright P
    BJU Int; 2018 Nov; 122(5):760-773. PubMed ID: 29726085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.