These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Internet Searches for Abortion Medications Following the Leaked Supreme Court of the United States Draft Ruling. Poliak A; Satybaldiyeva N; Strathdee SA; Leas EC; Rao R; Smith D; Ayers JW JAMA Intern Med; 2022 Sep; 182(9):1002-1004. PubMed ID: 35767270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Leaked Supreme Court Ruling Opinion: Implications for Abortion Access. Reingold RB; Gostin LO JAMA; 2022 Jul; 328(1):13-14. PubMed ID: 35666522 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. We're horrified by the rejection of Roe v Wade-but abortion is not a universal right in the UK. Graham S BMJ; 2022 Aug; 378():o1945. PubMed ID: 35977739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The US Supreme Court is wrong to disregard evidence on the harm of banning abortion. Nature; 2022 May; 605(7909):193-194. PubMed ID: 35513454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. United States Supreme Court and abortion. 3. Holman EJ JAMA; 1973 Jul; 225(4):447-8. PubMed ID: 4741028 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Supreme Court and abortion: 1. Upholding constitutional principles. Noonan JT Hastings Cent Rep; 1980 Dec; 10(6):14-6. PubMed ID: 7461954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion 1980: the debate continues. Healey JM Conn Med; 1980 Sep; 44(9):605. PubMed ID: 7408487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tubal Sterilization Requests at a Single Institution Following the Supreme Court Decision to Overturn the Constitutional Right to Abortion. Liang AC; Gliwa C; Loder CM; Dalton VK; Smith RD JAMA; 2023 Jul; 330(4):374-375. PubMed ID: 37490094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion and liberalism: a comparison between the abortion decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and the Constitutional Court of West Germany. Morris DG Hastings Int Comp Law Rev; 1988; 11(2):159-245. PubMed ID: 11655935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [The judgment of the Supreme Court American statement on abortion: an ″earthquake″ with unintended consequences]. Díez Fernández JA Cuad Bioet; 2022; 33(109):351-352. PubMed ID: 36493419 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: a path to constitutional equalibrium. Chopko ME Campbell Law Rev; 1990; 12(2):181-220. PubMed ID: 11656527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion Convictions Before Roe. Linton PB Issues Law Med; 2021; 36(1):77-110. PubMed ID: 33939343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Ending the constitutional right to abortion in the United States. Gostin LO; Reingold RB BMJ; 2022 Aug; 378():o1897. PubMed ID: 35914779 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Defying the will of the people: The US Supreme Court overturns right to abortion. Macklin R Indian J Med Ethics; 2022; VII(4):261-263. PubMed ID: 36398395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Historical Feature: A Long History of Abortion. McSpedon C Am J Nurs; 2022 Oct; 122(10):42-44. PubMed ID: 36136024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. US Supreme Court expected to weaken abortion rights. Jaffe S Lancet; 2021 Dec; 398(10317):2137-2138. PubMed ID: 34895521 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]