These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35760451)

  • 1. Theory and practice of Bayesian and frequentist frameworks for network meta-analysis.
    Sadeghirad B; Foroutan F; Zoratti MJ; Busse JW; Brignardello-Petersen R; Guyatt G; Thabane L
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2023 Jun; 28(3):204-209. PubMed ID: 35760451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictive P-score for treatment ranking in Bayesian network meta-analysis.
    Rosenberger KJ; Duan R; Chen Y; Lin L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Oct; 21(1):213. PubMed ID: 34657593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpreting and assessing confidence in network meta-analysis results: an introduction for clinicians.
    Yang A; Pechlivanoglou P; Aoyama K
    J Anesth; 2022 Aug; 36(4):524-531. PubMed ID: 35641661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Software and package applicating for network meta-analysis: A usage-based comparative study.
    Xu C; Niu Y; Wu J; Gu H; Zhang C
    J Evid Based Med; 2018 Aug; 11(3):176-183. PubMed ID: 29266878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing Bayesian and frequentist approaches for multiple outcome mixed treatment comparisons.
    Hong H; Carlin BP; Shamliyan TA; Wyman JF; Ramakrishnan R; Sainfort F; Kane RL
    Med Decis Making; 2013 Jul; 33(5):702-14. PubMed ID: 23549384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of Bayesian and frequentist methods in random-effects network meta-analysis of binary data.
    Seide SE; Jensen K; Kieser M
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 May; 11(3):363-378. PubMed ID: 31955519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Network meta-analysis: application and practice using R software.
    Shim SR; Kim SJ; Lee J; Rücker G
    Epidemiol Health; 2019; 41():e2019013. PubMed ID: 30999733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian Methods for Meta-Analyses of Binary Outcomes: Implementations, Examples, and Impact of Priors.
    Al Amer FM; Thompson CG; Lin L
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Mar; 18(7):. PubMed ID: 33801771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence inconsistency degrees of freedom in Bayesian network meta-analysis.
    Lin L
    J Biopharm Stat; 2021 May; 31(3):317-330. PubMed ID: 33296239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian splines versus fractional polynomials in network meta-analysis.
    Heinecke A; Tallarita M; De Iorio M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Oct; 20(1):261. PubMed ID: 33081698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nonproportional Hazards in Network Meta-Analysis: Efficient Strategies for Model Building and Analysis.
    Wiksten A; Hawkins N; Piepho HP; Gsteiger S
    Value Health; 2020 Jul; 23(7):918-927. PubMed ID: 32762994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prior Choices of Between-Study Heterogeneity in Contemporary Bayesian Network Meta-analyses: an Empirical Study.
    Rosenberger KJ; Xing A; Murad MH; Chu H; Lin L
    J Gen Intern Med; 2021 Apr; 36(4):1049-1057. PubMed ID: 33403620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical approaches for conducting network meta-analysis in drug development.
    Jones B; Roger J; Lane PW; Lawton A; Fletcher C; Cappelleri JC; Tate H; Moneuse P;
    Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(6):523-31. PubMed ID: 22213533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A design-by-treatment interaction model for network meta-analysis and meta-regression with integrated nested Laplace approximations.
    Günhan BK; Friede T; Held L
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Jun; 9(2):179-194. PubMed ID: 29193801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. BUGSnet: an R package to facilitate the conduct and reporting of Bayesian network Meta-analyses.
    Béliveau A; Boyne DJ; Slater J; Brenner D; Arora P
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Oct; 19(1):196. PubMed ID: 31640567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hierarchical Bayesian approaches for detecting inconsistency in network meta-analysis.
    Zhao H; Hodges JS; Ma H; Jiang Q; Carlin BP
    Stat Med; 2016 Sep; 35(20):3524-36. PubMed ID: 27037506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Network meta-analysis: application and practice using Stata.
    Shim S; Yoon BH; Shin IS; Bae JM
    Epidemiol Health; 2017; 39():e2017047. PubMed ID: 29092392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative efficacy of mitochondrial agents for bipolar disorder during depressive episodes: a network meta-analysis using frequentist and Bayesian approaches.
    Maiti R; Mishra A; Mishra BR; Jena M
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2021 Dec; 238(12):3347-3356. PubMed ID: 34751803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Network meta-analysis using R: a review of currently available automated packages.
    Neupane B; Richer D; Bonner AJ; Kibret T; Beyene J
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e115065. PubMed ID: 25541687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.