318 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35761117)
1. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) for the Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer in Australia.
Song R; Jeet V; Sharma R; Hoyle M; Parkinson B
Pharmacoeconomics; 2022 Aug; 40(8):807-821. PubMed ID: 35761117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging Cost-effective in Prostate Cancer: An Analysis Informed by the proPSMA Trial.
de Feria Cardet RE; Hofman MS; Segard T; Yim J; Williams S; Francis RJ; Frydenberg M; Lawrentschuk N; Murphy DG; De Abreu Lourenco R
Eur Urol; 2021 Mar; 79(3):413-418. PubMed ID: 33341285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Head-to-head Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography and Conventional Imaging Modalities for Initial Staging of Intermediate- to High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Chow KM; So WZ; Lee HJ; Lee A; Yap DWT; Takwoingi Y; Tay KJ; Tuan J; Thang SP; Lam W; Yuen J; Lawrentschuk N; Hofman MS; Murphy DG; Chen K
Eur Urol; 2023 Jul; 84(1):36-48. PubMed ID: 37032189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. More advantages in detecting bone and soft tissue metastases from prostate cancer using
Pianou NK; Stavrou PZ; Vlontzou E; Rondogianni P; Exarhos DN; Datseris IE
Hell J Nucl Med; 2019; 22(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 30843003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intra-individual comparison of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography versus bone scan in detecting skeletal metastasis at prostate cancer diagnosis.
Shanmugasundaram R; Saad J; Heyworth A; Wong V; Pelecanos A; Arianayagam M; Canagasingham B; Ferguson R; Goolam AS; Khadra M; Kam J; Ko R; McCombie S; Varol C; Winter M; Mansberg R; Nguyen D; Bui C; Loh H; Le K; Roberts MJ
BJU Int; 2024 Feb; 133 Suppl 3():25-32. PubMed ID: 37943964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-Effectiveness Modeling of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography with Piflufolastat F 18 for the Initial Diagnosis of Patients with Prostate Cancer in the United States.
Yee CW; Harvey MJ; Xin Y; Kirson NY
Pharmacoeconomics; 2024 Feb; 42(2):231-247. PubMed ID: 37934376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Compared with Conventional Imaging for Initial Staging of Treatment-naïve Intermediate- and High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Retrospective Single-center Study.
Lenis AT; Pooli A; Lec PM; Sadun TY; Johnson DC; Lebacle C; Fendler WP; Eiber M; Czernin J; Reiter RE; Calais J
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 5(5):544-552. PubMed ID: 32958451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A prospective randomized multicentre study of the impact of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT imaging for staging high-risk prostate cancer prior to curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy (proPSMA study): clinical trial protocol.
Hofman MS; Murphy DG; Williams SG; Nzenza T; Herschtal A; Lourenco RA; Bailey DL; Budd R; Hicks RJ; Francis RJ; Lawrentschuk N
BJU Int; 2018 Nov; 122(5):783-793. PubMed ID: 29726071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. How accurate is
Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Five-year trends of bone scan and prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography utilization in prostate cancer: A retrospective review in a private centre.
Haran C; McBean R; Parsons R; Wong D
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2019 Aug; 63(4):495-499. PubMed ID: 30972933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is PSMA PET/CT cost-effective for the primary staging in prostate cancer? First results for European countries and the USA based on the proPSMA trial.
Holzgreve A; Unterrainer M; Calais J; Adams T; Oprea-Lager DE; Goffin K; Lopci E; Unterrainer LM; Kramer KKM; Schmidt-Hegemann NS; Casuscelli J; Stief CG; Ricke J; Bartenstein P; Kunz WG; Mehrens D
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Oct; 50(12):3750-3754. PubMed ID: 37428216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12.
von Eyben FE; Picchio M; von Eyben R; Rhee H; Bauman G
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):686-693. PubMed ID: 28753806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Prospective Comparison of
Anttinen M; Ettala O; Malaspina S; Jambor I; Sandell M; Kajander S; Rinta-Kiikka I; Schildt J; Saukko E; Rautio P; Timonen KL; Matikainen T; Noponen T; Saunavaara J; Löyttyniemi E; Taimen P; Kemppainen J; Dean PB; Blanco Sequeiros R; Aronen HJ; Seppänen M; Boström PJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 4(4):635-644. PubMed ID: 32675047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ga-PSMA PET/CT Staging of Newly Diagnosed Intermediate- and High-Risk Prostate Cancer.
Kuten J; Mabjeesh NJ; Lerman H; Levine C; Barnes S; Even-Sapir E
Isr Med Assoc J; 2019 Feb; 21(2):100-104. PubMed ID: 30772960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Exploratory cost-effectiveness analysis of
Gordon LG; Elliott TM; Joshi A; Williams ED; Vela I
Clin Exp Metastasis; 2020 Apr; 37(2):305-312. PubMed ID: 32064552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk of metastatic disease on
Yaxley JW; Raveenthiran S; Nouhaud FX; Samaratunga H; Yaxley WJ; Coughlin G; Yaxley AJ; Gianduzzo T; Kua B; McEwan L; Wong D
BJU Int; 2019 Sep; 124(3):401-407. PubMed ID: 31141284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The CONFIRM trial protocol: the utility of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography in active surveillance for prostate cancer.
Bagguley D; Harewood L; McKenzie D; Ptasznik G; Ong S; Chengodu T; Woon D; Sim K; Sheldon J; Lawrentschuk N
BJU Int; 2024 Apr; 133 Suppl 4():27-36. PubMed ID: 37904302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Metastatic Sites' Location and Impact on Patient Management After the Introduction of Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Newly Diagnosed and Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Critical Review.
Mattana F; Muraglia L; Rajwa P; Zattoni F; Marra G; Chiu PKF; Heidegger I; Kasivisvanathan V; Kesch CV; Olivier J; Preisser F; Thibault C; Valerio M; van den Bergh RCN; Gandaglia G; Ceci F;
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Apr; 6(2):128-136. PubMed ID: 36804735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can Negative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Avoid the Need for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with Backup Histology as Reference Standard.
Stabile A; Pellegrino A; Mazzone E; Cannoletta D; de Angelis M; Barletta F; Scuderi S; Cucchiara V; Gandaglia G; Raggi D; Necchi A; Karakiewicz P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 5(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 34538770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modelling Study with an Interactive Model Assessing the Cost-effectiveness of
Scholte M; Barentsz JO; Sedelaar JPM; Gotthardt M; Grutters JPC; Rovers MM
Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Sep; 6(5):967-974. PubMed ID: 30826284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
