188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35761229)
1. "Everything has been tried and his heart can't recover…": A Descriptive Review of "Do Everything!" in the Archive of Ontario Consent and Capacity Board.
Yim H; Hashmi SS; Dewar B; Dyason C; Kyeremanteng K; Lamb S; Shamy M
BMC Med Ethics; 2022 Jun; 23(1):66. PubMed ID: 35761229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Best interests at end of life: an updated review of decisions made by the Consent and Capacity Board of Ontario.
Chidwick P; Sibbald R; Hawryluck L
J Crit Care; 2013 Feb; 28(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 23228726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The origin of informed consent].
Mallardi V
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Communication about serious illness care goals: a review and synthesis of best practices.
Bernacki RE; Block SD;
JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Dec; 174(12):1994-2003. PubMed ID: 25330167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Best interests at end of life: a review of decisions made by the Consent and Capacity Board of Ontario.
Sibbald RW; Chidwick P
J Crit Care; 2010 Mar; 25(1):171.e1-7. PubMed ID: 19781897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.
Perrenoud B; Velonaki VS; Bodenmann P; Ramelet AS
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Oct; 13(10):82-94. PubMed ID: 26571285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Physician perspectives on legal processes for resolving end-of-life disputes.
Chidwick P; Sibbald R
Healthc Q; 2011; 14(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 21841397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Documentation of best interest by intensivists: a retrospective study in an Ontario critical care unit.
Ratnapalan M; Cooper AB; Scales DC; Pinto R
BMC Med Ethics; 2010 Feb; 11():1. PubMed ID: 20146820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The standard of care and conflicts at the end of life in critical care: lessons from medical-legal crossroads and the role of a quasi-judicial tribunal in decision-making.
Hawryluck L; Sibbald R; Chidwick P
J Crit Care; 2013 Dec; 28(6):1055-61. PubMed ID: 23891135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A framework for resolving disagreement during end of life care in the critical care unit.
Choong K; Cupido C; Nelson E; Arnold DM; Burns K; Cook D; Meade M;
Clin Invest Med; 2010 Aug; 33(4):E240-53. PubMed ID: 20691142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Exploring the experiences and perspectives of substitute decision-makers involved in decisions about deceased organ donation: a qualitative study protocol.
Crawshaw J; Presseau J; van Allen Z; Pinheiro Carvalho L; Jordison K; English S; Fergusson DA; Lauzier F; Turgeon AF; Sarti AJ; Martin C; D'Aragon F; Li AH; Knoll G; Ball I; Brehaut J; Burns KEA; Fortin MC; Weiss M; Meade M; Marsolais P; Shemie S; Zaabat S; Dhanani S; Kitto SC; Chassé M;
BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e034594. PubMed ID: 31874899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perceptions of key stakeholders on procedural justice in the Consent And Capacity Board of Ontario's hearings.
Paul S; Nakhost A; Stergiopoulos V; Matheson FI; Simpson AIF; Guimond T
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2020; 68():101515. PubMed ID: 32033692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
Busolo D; Woodgate R
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 26447011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rational Patient Apathy.
Noah BA; Reich-Graefe R
Seton Hall Law Rev; 2019; 49(3):535-628. PubMed ID: 30888137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is there a role for physician involvement in introducing research to surrogate decision makers in the intensive care unit? (The Approach trial: a pilot mixed methods study).
Burns KE; Rizvi L; Smith OM; Lee Y; Lee J; Wang M; Brown M; Parker M; Premji A; Leung D; Hammond Mobilio M; Gotlib-Conn L; Nisenbaum R; Santos M; Li Y; Mehta S
Intensive Care Med; 2015 Jan; 41(1):58-67. PubMed ID: 25491659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The beneficial role of a judicial process when "everything" is too much?
Handelman M; Parke B
Healthc Q; 2008; 11(4):46-50. PubMed ID: 18818529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Experience of Surrogate Decision Makers on Being Approached for Consent for Patient Participation in Research. A Multicenter Study.
Burns KE; Prats CJ; Maione M; Lanceta M; Zubrinich C; Jeffs L; Smith OM;
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2017 Feb; 14(2):238-245. PubMed ID: 27849142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].
Santiago-Delefosse M; Cahen F; Coeffin-Driol C
Encephale; 2003; 29(4 Pt 1):293-305. PubMed ID: 14615699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Systematic review and content analysis of Australian health care substitute decision making online resources.
Tran J; Sellars M; Nolte L; White BP; Sinclair C; Fetherstonhaugh D; Detering K
Aust Health Rev; 2021 Jun; 45(3):317-327. PubMed ID: 33472740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Difficult healthcare transitions: Ethical analysis and policy recommendations for unrepresented patients.
Abdool R; Szego M; Buchman D; Justason L; Bean S; Heesters A; Kaufman H; Parke B; Wagner F; Gibson J
Nurs Ethics; 2016 Nov; 23(7):770-783. PubMed ID: 26159620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
