These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35762346)
1. Effect of field of view (FOV) positioning and shielding on radiation dose in paediatric CBCT. Vogiatzi T; Menz R; Verna C; Bornstein MM; Dagassan-Berndt D Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2022 Sep; 51(6):20210316. PubMed ID: 35762346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of thyroid gland shielding in dental CBCT using a paediatric anthropomorphic phantom. Hidalgo A; Davies J; Horner K; Theodorakou C Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(3):20140285. PubMed ID: 25411710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effective radiation dose and eye lens dose in dental cone beam CT: effect of field of view and angle of rotation. Pauwels R; Zhang G; Theodorakou C; Walker A; Bosmans H; Jacobs R; Bogaerts R; Horner K; Br J Radiol; 2014 Oct; 87(1042):20130654. PubMed ID: 25189417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can modifying shielding, field of view, and exposure settings make the effective dose of a cone-beam computed tomography comparable to traditional radiographs used for orthodontic diagnosis? Ting S; Attaia D; Johnson KB; Kossa SS; Friedland B; Allareddy V; Masoud MI Angle Orthod; 2020 Sep; 90(5):655-664. PubMed ID: 33378479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of thyroid gland shielding on radiation doses in dental cone beam computed tomography with small and medium fields of view. Grüning M; Koivisto J; Mah J; Bumann A Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2022 Aug; 134(2):245-253. PubMed ID: 35534405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view. Hirsch E; Wolf U; Heinicke F; Silva MA Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):268-73. PubMed ID: 18606748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cone beam computed tomography for dental and maxillofacial imaging: technique improvement and low-dose protocols. Feragalli B; Rampado O; Abate C; Macrì M; Festa F; Stromei F; Caputi S; Guglielmi G Radiol Med; 2017 Aug; 122(8):581-588. PubMed ID: 28365888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Thyroid shields for radiation dose reduction during cone beam computed tomography scanning for different oral and maxillofacial regions. Qu X; Li G; Zhang Z; Ma X Eur J Radiol; 2012 Mar; 81(3):e376-80. PubMed ID: 22209523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dosimetry in CBCT with Different Protocols: Emphasis on Small FOVs Including Exams for TMJ. Nascimento HAR; Andrade MEA; Frazão MAG; Nascimento EHL; Ramos-Perez FMM; Freitas DQ Braz Dent J; 2017; 28(4):511-516. PubMed ID: 29160405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dose reduction in head and neck organs through shielding and application of different scanning parameters in cone beam computed tomography: an effective dose study using an adult male anthropomorphic phantom. Attaia D; Ting S; Johnson B; Masoud MI; Friedland B; Abu El Fotouh M; Abu El Sadat S Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Jul; 130(1):101-109. PubMed ID: 31982369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of optimum, indication-specific imaging fields on the radiation exposure from CBCT examinations of impacted maxillary canines and mandibular third molars. Ilo AM; Waltimo-Sirén J; Pakbaznejad Esmaeili E; Ekholm M; Kortesniemi M Acta Odontol Scand; 2024 Jan; 82(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 38058132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of lead apron shielding on absorbed doses from cone-beam computed tomography. Rottke D; Andersson J; Ejima KI; Sawada K; Schulze D Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Jun; 175(1):110-117. PubMed ID: 27664428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study of the effective radiation doses from cone beam computed tomography and plain radiography for sialography. Jadu F; Yaffe MJ; Lam EW Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 Jul; 39(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 20587648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiation dose of cone-beam computed tomography compared to conventional radiographs in orthodontics. Signorelli L; Patcas R; Peltomäki T; Schätzle M J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jan; 77(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 26747662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using GafChromic film to estimate the effective dose from dental cone beam CT and panoramic radiography. Al-Okshi A; Nilsson M; Petersson A; Wiese M; Lindh C Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(7):20120343. PubMed ID: 23610090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effective doses of scout projections in maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography. Barros-Costa M; Britten J; Jones C; Ramage A; Cascante-Sequeira D; Blackburn M; Swanson C; Santaella GM; Scarfe W; Oliveira-Santos C Clin Oral Investig; 2024 Oct; 28(10):572. PubMed ID: 39367969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of leaded glasses and thyroid shielding on cone beam CT radiation dose in an adult female phantom. Goren AD; Prins RD; Dauer LT; Quinn B; Al-Najjar A; Faber RD; Patchell G; Branets I; Colosi DC Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(6):20120260. PubMed ID: 23412460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiation exposure in cone beam CT measured using a MOSFET and RPLGD dosimeter and Monte Carlo simulation in phantom. Kweon DC J Xray Sci Technol; 2023; 31(4):837-852. PubMed ID: 37248944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]