128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35763334)
1. Factors affecting the decisions of women considering oocyte cryopreservation: A blog study.
Özöztürk S; Çiçek Ö
Health Care Women Int; 2024; 45(1):101-112. PubMed ID: 35763334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Women Electing Oocyte Cryopreservation: Characteristics, Information Sources, and Oocyte Disposition: A Systematic Review.
Giannopapa M; Sakellaridi A; Pana A; Velonaki VS
J Midwifery Womens Health; 2022 Mar; 67(2):178-201. PubMed ID: 35156301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Elective egg freezers' disposition decisions: a qualitative study.
Caughey LE; White KM; Lensen S; Peate M
Fertil Steril; 2023 Jul; 120(1):145-160. PubMed ID: 37032273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Physicians' attitudes towards using elective oocyte cryopreservation to accommodate the demands of their career.
Nasab S; Shah JS; Nurudeen K; Jooya ND; Abdallah ME; Sibai BM
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2019 Sep; 36(9):1935-1947. PubMed ID: 31376103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Knowledge and decision making about future fertility and oocyte cryopreservation among young women.
Stevenson EL; Gispanski L; Fields K; Cappadora M; Hurt M
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2021 Apr; 24(2):112-121. PubMed ID: 30623694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting the likelihood of live birth for elective oocyte cryopreservation: a counseling tool for physicians and patients.
Goldman RH; Racowsky C; Farland LV; Munné S; Ribustello L; Fox JH
Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 32(4):853-859. PubMed ID: 28166330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Social oocyte cryopreservation: a portrayal of Brazilian women.
Santo EVE; Dieamant F; Petersen CG; Mauri AL; Vagnini LD; Renzi A; Zamara C; Oliveira JBA; Baruffi RLR; Franco JG
JBRA Assist Reprod; 2017 Jun; 21(2):101-104. PubMed ID: 28609276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical outcome of planned oocyte cryopreservation at advanced age.
Tsafrir A; Ben-Ami I; Eldar-Geva T; Gal M; Dekel N; Levi H; Schonberger O; Srebnik N; Weintraub A; Goldberg D; Hyman J
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2022 Nov; 39(11):2625-2633. PubMed ID: 36264444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An exploratory study of motivations for elective oocyte cryopreservation.
Errázuriz J; Filselcker I; Alwane E; Silva M; Diaz Reiher E; Sanhueza P; Gonzalez P; Donoso P
Medwave; 2023 Jun; 23(5):e268. PubMed ID: 37315306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What is the quality of information on social oocyte cryopreservation provided by websites of Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology member fertility clinics?
Avraham S; Machtinger R; Cahan T; Sokolov A; Racowsky C; Seidman DS
Fertil Steril; 2014 Jan; 101(1):222-6. PubMed ID: 24140039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A major increase in oocyte cryopreservation cycles in the USA, Australia and New Zealand since 2010 is highlighted by younger women but a need for standardized data collection.
Johnston M; Richings NM; Leung A; Sakkas D; Catt S
Hum Reprod; 2021 Feb; 36(3):624-635. PubMed ID: 33367704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of GnRH-agonist trigger for the final maturation of oocytes in normal and low responders undergoing planned oocyte cryopreservation.
Maslow BL; Guarnaccia M; Stefanacci C; Ramirez L; Klein JU
Hum Reprod; 2020 May; 35(5):1054-1060. PubMed ID: 32406915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Opinions of female academicians on oocyte freezing: a qualitative study.
Tandoğan Ö; Kugcumen G; Satılmış İG
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2023; 69(7):e20230221. PubMed ID: 37466604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The quality of information about elective oocyte cryopreservation (EOC) on Australian fertility clinic websites.
Beilby K; Dudink I; Kablar D; Kaynak M; Rodrigo S; Hammarberg K
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Aug; 60(4):605-609. PubMed ID: 32648257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Awareness of fertility and reproductive aging in women seeking oocyte cryopreservation, reproductive aged controls, and female health care professionals: A comparative study.
Dundar Akın O; Boza A; Yakin K; Urman B
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Feb; 233():146-150. PubMed ID: 30597339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Oocyte cryopreservation for age-related fertility loss.
; Dondorp W; de Wert G; Pennings G; Shenfield F; Devroey P; Tarlatzis B; Barri P; Diedrich K
Hum Reprod; 2012 May; 27(5):1231-7. PubMed ID: 22357771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Planned oocyte cryopreservation-10-15-year follow-up: return rates and cycle outcomes.
Blakemore JK; Grifo JA; DeVore SM; Hodes-Wertz B; Berkeley AS
Fertil Steril; 2021 Jun; 115(6):1511-1520. PubMed ID: 33712289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Exploring the knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of women of reproductive age towards fertility and elective oocyte cryopreservation for age-related fertility decline in the UK: a cross-sectional survey.
Kasaven LS; Mitra A; Ostrysz P; Theodorou E; Murugesu S; Yazbek J; Bracewell-Milnes T; Ben Nagi J; Jones BP; Saso S
Hum Reprod; 2023 Dec; 38(12):2478-2488. PubMed ID: 37816663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ethics of medical and nonmedical oocyte cryopreservation.
Patrizio P; Molinari E; Caplan A
Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes; 2016 Dec; 23(6):470-475. PubMed ID: 27653001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does oocyte banking for anticipated gamete exhaustion influence future relational and reproductive choices? A follow-up of bankers and non-bankers.
Stoop D; Maes E; Polyzos NP; Verheyen G; Tournaye H; Nekkebroeck J
Hum Reprod; 2015 Feb; 30(2):338-44. PubMed ID: 25432922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
