These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35764013)
21. Anatomically Aligned Loading During Falls: Influence of Fall Protocol, Sex and Trochanteric Soft Tissue Thickness. Pretty SP; Levine IC; Laing AC Ann Biomed Eng; 2021 Dec; 49(12):3267-3279. PubMed ID: 34494215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Assessment of femoral neck strength by 3-dimensional X-ray absorptiometry. Le Bras A; Kolta S; Soubrane P; Skalli W; Roux C; Mitton D J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(4):425-30. PubMed ID: 17097528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. QCT of the proximal femur--which parameters should be measured to discriminate hip fracture? Museyko O; Bousson V; Adams J; Laredo J-; Engelke K Osteoporos Int; 2016 Mar; 27(3):1137-1147. PubMed ID: 26415934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Insights into relationships between body mass, composition and bone: findings in elite rugby players. Hind K; Gannon L; Brightmore A; Beck B J Clin Densitom; 2015; 18(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 25659180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Structural determinants of hip fracture in elderly women: re-analysis of the data from the EPIDOS study. Szulc P; Duboeuf F; Schott AM; Dargent-Molina P; Meunier PJ; Delmas PD Osteoporos Int; 2006 Feb; 17(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 15983728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Force magnitude and distribution during impacts to the hip are affected differentially by body size and body composition. Levine I; Pretty SP; Mourtzakis M; Laing AC J Biomech; 2024 Jul; 172():112213. PubMed ID: 38968649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. In vivo discrimination of hip fracture with quantitative computed tomography: results from the prospective European Femur Fracture Study (EFFECT). Bousson VD; Adams J; Engelke K; Aout M; Cohen-Solal M; Bergot C; Haguenauer D; Goldberg D; Champion K; Aksouh R; Vicaut E; Laredo JD J Bone Miner Res; 2011 Apr; 26(4):881-93. PubMed ID: 20939025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Femoral neck geometry and hip fracture risk: the Geelong osteoporosis study. El-Kaissi S; Pasco JA; Henry MJ; Panahi S; Nicholson JG; Nicholson GC; Kotowicz MA Osteoporos Int; 2005 Oct; 16(10):1299-303. PubMed ID: 16082496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Dual hip bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: geometry and effect of physical activity. Brownbill RA; Lindsey C; Crncevic-Orlic Z; Ilich JZ Calcif Tissue Int; 2003 Sep; 73(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 14667133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Proximal hip geometry and hip fracture risk assessment in a Korean population. Im GI; Lim MJ Osteoporos Int; 2011 Mar; 22(3):803-7. PubMed ID: 20552332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effects of anteversion on femoral bone mineral density and geometry measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: a cadaver study. Cheng XG; Nicholson PH; Boonen S; Brys P; Lowet G; Nijs J; Dequeker J Bone; 1997 Jul; 21(1):113-7. PubMed ID: 9213017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of hip geometry, strength, and estimated fracture risk in women with anorexia nervosa and overweight/obese women. Bachmann KN; Fazeli PK; Lawson EA; Russell BM; Riccio AD; Meenaghan E; Gerweck AV; Eddy K; Holmes T; Goldstein M; Weigel T; Ebrahimi S; Mickley D; Gleysteen S; Bredella MA; Klibanski A; Miller KK J Clin Endocrinol Metab; 2014 Dec; 99(12):4664-73. PubMed ID: 25062461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of a simplified hip structure analysis method for the prediction of incident hip fracture events. Khoo BC; Lewis JR; Brown K; Prince RL Osteoporos Int; 2016 Jan; 27(1):241-8. PubMed ID: 26282230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Different morphometric and densitometric parameters predict cervical and trochanteric hip fracture: the EPIDOS Study. Duboeuf F; Hans D; Schott AM; Kotzki PO; Favier F; Marcelli C; Meunier PJ; Delmas PD J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Nov; 12(11):1895-902. PubMed ID: 9383694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Factors that influence the distribution of impact force relative to the proximal femur during lateral falls. Pretty SP; Levine IC; Laing AC J Biomech; 2021 Oct; 127():110679. PubMed ID: 34418865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Exercise loading history and femoral neck strength in a sideways fall: A three-dimensional finite element modeling study. Abe S; Narra N; Nikander R; Hyttinen J; Kouhia R; Sievänen H Bone; 2016 Nov; 92():9-17. PubMed ID: 27477004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Do variations in hip geometry explain differences in hip fracture risk between Japanese and white Americans? Nakamura T; Turner CH; Yoshikawa T; Slemenda CW; Peacock M; Burr DB; Mizuno Y; Orimo H; Ouchi Y; Johnston CC J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Jul; 9(7):1071-6. PubMed ID: 7942154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Femur strength index predicts hip fracture independent of bone density and hip axis length. Faulkner KG; Wacker WK; Barden HS; Simonelli C; Burke PK; Ragi S; Del Rio L Osteoporos Int; 2006; 17(4):593-9. PubMed ID: 16447009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Femoral neck cortical geometry measured with magnetic resonance imaging is associated with proximal femur strength. Manske SL; Liu-Ambrose T; de Bakker PM; Liu D; Kontulainen S; Guy P; Oxland TR; McKay HA Osteoporos Int; 2006 Oct; 17(10):1539-45. PubMed ID: 16847586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]