These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35764134)

  • 1. Development and validation of the Value of Uterus instrument and visual analog scale to measure patients' valuation of their uterus.
    Chang OH; Walters MD; Yao M; Lapin B
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Nov; 227(5):746.e1-746.e9. PubMed ID: 35764134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy vs Vaginal Hysterectomy With Uterosacral Ligament Suspension on Treatment Failure in Women With Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Rogers RG; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Grey S; Sridhar A; Wallace D;
    JAMA; 2019 Sep; 322(11):1054-1065. PubMed ID: 31529008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with suspension of the uterosacral ligaments in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.
    Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Vierhout ME; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
    BMJ; 2015 Jul; 351():h3717. PubMed ID: 26206451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Impact of Sacrospinous Hysteropexy and Vaginal Hysterectomy With Suspension of the Uterosacral Ligaments on Sexual Function in Women With Uterine Prolapse: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Comparative Study.
    Detollenaere RJ; Kreuwel IA; Dijkstra JR; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HW
    J Sex Med; 2016 Feb; 13(2):213-9. PubMed ID: 26805940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characteristics associated with composite surgical failure over 5 years of women in a randomized trial of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
    Richter HE; Sridhar A; Nager CW; Komesu YM; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Rardin C; Visco A; Mazloomdoost D; Thomas S;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Jan; 228(1):63.e1-63.e16. PubMed ID: 35931131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: 5-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
    Nager CW; Visco AG; Richter HE; Rardin CR; Komesu Y; Harvie HS; Zyczynski HM; Paraiso MFR; Mazloomdoost D; Sridhar A; Thomas S;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Aug; 225(2):153.e1-153.e31. PubMed ID: 33716071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hysteropexy: an Option for the Repair of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Bradley S; Gutman RE; Richter LA
    Curr Urol Rep; 2018 Feb; 19(2):15. PubMed ID: 29476274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.
    Meriwether KV; Antosh DD; Olivera CK; Kim-Fine S; Balk EM; Murphy M; Grimes CL; Sleemi A; Singh R; Dieter AA; Crisp CC; Rahn DD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):129-146.e2. PubMed ID: 29353031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surgical interventions for uterine prolapse and for vault prolapse: the two VUE RCTs.
    Hemming C; Constable L; Goulao B; Kilonzo M; Boyers D; Elders A; Cooper K; Smith A; Freeman R; Breeman S; McDonald A; Hagen S; Montgomery I; Norrie J; Glazener C
    Health Technol Assess; 2020 Mar; 24(13):1-220. PubMed ID: 32138809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Does the uterus need to be removed to correct uterovaginal prolapse?
    Gutman RE
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 28(5):435-40. PubMed ID: 27467823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved body image after uterovaginal prolapse surgery with or without hysterectomy.
    Rogers RG; Meyer I; Smith AL; Ackenbom M; Barden L; Korbly N; Mazloomdoost D; Thomas S; Nager C
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Jan; 33(1):115-122. PubMed ID: 34432089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Does hysterectomy modifies the anatomical and functional outcomes of prolapse surgery?: Clinical Practice Guidelines].
    Cayrac M; Warembourg S; Le Normand L; Fatton B
    Prog Urol; 2016 Jul; 26 Suppl 1():S73-88. PubMed ID: 27595628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Role of Hysteropexy in the Management of Pelvic Organ Prolapse.
    Gan ZS; Roberson DS; Smith AL
    Curr Urol Rep; 2022 Sep; 23(9):175-183. PubMed ID: 35789456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Complications and objective outcomes of uterine preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse versus procedures removing the Uterus, a systematic review.
    Azadi A; Marchand G; Masoud AT; Sainz K; Govindan M; Ware K; King A; Ruther S; Brazil G; Calteux N; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Coriell C; Goetz S; Ostergard DR
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Dec; 267():90-98. PubMed ID: 34736035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
    Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uterine preservation or hysterectomy at sacrospinous colpopexy for uterovaginal prolapse?
    Maher CF; Cary MP; Slack MC; Murray CJ; Milligan M; Schluter P
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2001; 12(6):381-4; discussion 384-5. PubMed ID: 11795641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Uterine preservation during surgery for uterovaginal prolapse: a review.
    Diwan A; Rardin CR; Kohli N
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2004; 15(4):286-92. PubMed ID: 15517676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Uterine-preserving surgeries for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.
    Meriwether KV; Balk EM; Antosh DD; Olivera CK; Kim-Fine S; Murphy M; Grimes CL; Sleemi A; Singh R; Dieter AA; Crisp CC; Rahn DD
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):505-522. PubMed ID: 30741318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
    Schulten SFM; Detollenaere RJ; Stekelenburg J; IntHout J; Kluivers KB; van Eijndhoven HWF
    BMJ; 2019 Sep; 366():l5149. PubMed ID: 31506252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vaginal hysteropexy compared with vaginal hysterectomy with apical suspension for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: A 5-year cost-effectiveness Markov model.
    Wallace SL; Syan R; Lee K; Sokol ER
    BJOG; 2024 Feb; 131(3):362-371. PubMed ID: 37667669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.