These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35764839)

  • 41. Short-term Outcomes of Robotic Gastrectomy vs Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Patients With Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Ojima T; Nakamura M; Hayata K; Kitadani J; Katsuda M; Takeuchi A; Tominaga S; Nakai T; Nakamori M; Ohi M; Kusunoki M; Yamaue H
    JAMA Surg; 2021 Oct; 156(10):954-963. PubMed ID: 34468701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Safe implementation of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer under the requirements for universal health insurance coverage: a retrospective cohort study using a nationwide registry database in Japan.
    Suda K; Yamamoto H; Nishigori T; Obama K; Yoda Y; Hikage M; Shibasaki S; Tanaka T; Kakeji Y; Inomata M; Kitagawa Y; Miyata H; Terashima M; Noshiro H; Uyama I
    Gastric Cancer; 2022 Mar; 25(2):438-449. PubMed ID: 34637042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparison of short-term and long-term efficacy of laparoscopic and open gastrectomy in high-risk patients with gastric cancer: a propensity score-matching analysis.
    Xu BB; Lu J; Zheng ZF; Huang CM; Zheng CH; Xie JW; Wang JB; Lin JX; Chen QY; Cao LL; Lin M; Tu RH; Huang ZN; Li P; Lin JL
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Jan; 33(1):58-70. PubMed ID: 29931452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Robotic radical lymphadenectomy without touching the pancreas during gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
    Ojima T; Nakamura M; Nakamori M; Hayata K; Katsuda M; Maruoka S; Yamaue H
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Mar; 98(13):e15091. PubMed ID: 30921243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: The largest meta-analysis.
    Guerrini GP; Esposito G; Magistri P; Serra V; Guidetti C; Olivieri T; Catellani B; Assirati G; Ballarin R; Di Sandro S; Di Benedetto F
    Int J Surg; 2020 Oct; 82():210-228. PubMed ID: 32800976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a propensity score matching analysis.
    Zhong H; Liu X; Tian Y; Cao S; Li Z; Liu G; Sun Y; Zhang X; Han Z; Meng C; Jia Z; Wang Q; Zhou Y
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Aug; 37(8):5902-5915. PubMed ID: 37072637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effectiveness and safety of robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of 12,401 gastric cancer patients.
    Jin T; Liu HD; Yang K; Chen ZH; Zhang YX; Hu JK
    Updates Surg; 2022 Feb; 74(1):267-281. PubMed ID: 34655427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Less Severe Intra-Abdominal Infections in Robotic Surgery for Gastric Cancer Compared with Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis.
    Kubo N; Sakurai K; Tamamori Y; Fukui Y; Kuroda K; Aomatsu N; Nishii T; Tachimori A; Maeda K
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Jun; 29(6):3922-3933. PubMed ID: 35181811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Advantages of robotic gastrectomy for overweight patients with gastric cancer: a comparison study of robotic gastrectomy and conventional laparoscopic gastrectomy.
    Komatsu M; Kinoshita T; Akimoto E; Yoshida M; Nagata H; Habu T; Okayama T; Yura M
    Surg Today; 2023 Nov; 53(11):1260-1268. PubMed ID: 37024640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Efficacy comparison between laparoscopy and open surgery in the treatment of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors larger than 2 cm using multicenter propensity score matching method].
    Wu X; Sun LD; Wang M; Zhang P; Yang ZL; Liang H; Tao KX; Cao H; Xu WT
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 23(9):888-895. PubMed ID: 32927514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Robotic surgery for gastric cancer in the west: A systematic review and meta-analyses of short-and long-term outcomes.
    Solaini L; Avanzolini A; Pacilio CA; Cucchetti A; Cavaliere D; Ercolani G
    Int J Surg; 2020 Nov; 83():170-175. PubMed ID: 32942065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Advantages of a robotic approach compared with laparoscopy gastrectomy for patients with high visceral fat area.
    Hikage M; Fujiya K; Waki Y; Kamiya S; Tanizawa Y; Bando E; Notsu A; Terashima M
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Aug; 36(8):6181-6193. PubMed ID: 35294634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic or robotic radical gastrectomy based on preoperative perigastric artery CTA surgical decision-making: a high-volume center retrospective study with propensity score matching.
    Meng C; Cao S; Tian Y; Shen S; Liu X; Li Z; Li Y; Sun Y; Xu J; Zhang X; Kong Y; Wang X; Yang H; Zhong H; Jia Z; Zhang D; Zhou Y
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Sep; 37(9):6930-6942. PubMed ID: 37328591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Clinical advantage of standardized robotic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a single-center retrospective cohort study using propensity-score matching analysis.
    Shibasaki S; Nakauchi M; Serizawa A; Nakamura K; Akimoto S; Tanaka T; Inaba K; Uyama I; Suda K
    Gastric Cancer; 2022 Jul; 25(4):804-816. PubMed ID: 35298742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a comprehensive contrastive analysis with propensity score matching.
    Zhang C; Zhang P; Yu J; Jiang Q; Shen Q; Mao G; Kargbo AB; Liu W; Zeng X; Yin Y; Tao K
    World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Nov; 21(1):350. PubMed ID: 37940927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Randomized controlled phase III trial to investigate superiority of robot-assisted gastrectomy over laparoscopic gastrectomy for clinical stage T1-4aN0-3 gastric cancer patients (JCOG1907, MONA LISA study): a study protocol.
    Makuuchi R; Terashima M; Terada M; Mizusawa J; Kita R; Tokunaga M; Omori T; Ojima T; Ehara K; Watanabe M; Yanagimoto Y; Nunobe S; Kinoshita T; Ito S; Nishida Y; Hihara J; Boku N; Kurokawa Y; Yoshikawa T;
    BMC Cancer; 2023 Oct; 23(1):987. PubMed ID: 37845660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Gastric Cancer Surgery: Short-Term Outcomes-Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 25,521 Patients.
    Loureiro P; Barbosa JP; Vale JF; Barbosa J
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2023 Aug; 33(8):782-800. PubMed ID: 37204324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Robotic vs open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis on short- and long-term outcomes.
    Solaini L; Bazzocchi F; Pellegrini S; Avanzolini A; Perenze B; Curti R; Morgagni P; Ercolani G
    Int J Med Robot; 2019 Oct; 15(5):e2019. PubMed ID: 31119901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Application of robotic and laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy to gastric cancer patients with body mass index ≥24 kg/m
    Cong T; Liu G; Zhang K; Gao Y; Cui J; Lan X; Teng D; Huo X; Wei B
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 21(3):318-324. PubMed ID: 29577221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Short-term outcomes and long-term quality of life after undergoing radical proximal gastrectomy with esophageal gastric tube anastomosis and total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomosis for Siewert type II and III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: A propensity score matching analysis].
    Xu ZW; Zhao K; Hong QQ; Chen YF; Wang HB; Lin HX; Wang TH; Xiao LB; Zhu JT; Yan S; You J
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Feb; 26(2):181-190. PubMed ID: 36797565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.