These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3576497)
1. Peer review in Texas. A survey of medical staffs. Ross K Tex Med; 1987 Mar; 83(3):91-3. PubMed ID: 3576497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reporting peer review actions to the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners. Young MG Tex Med; 1989 Jan; 85(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 2922688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Professional liability, peer review, and antitrust law. Rule CF Ear Nose Throat J; 1987 Oct; 66(10):381-2. PubMed ID: 3678108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Liability for peer review and privilege suspension. Davis CD Tex Hosp; 1984 Jul; 40(2):42. PubMed ID: 10267575 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Recent case offers hospitals new protection from antitrust liability. Davis CD Tex Hosp; 1985 Jul; 41(2):48-9. PubMed ID: 10278343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Federal Appeals Court reverses lower Court ruling; reaffirms immunity for hospitals and physicians in peer review cases. Leiker M WMJ; 2008 Nov; 107(7):344-6. PubMed ID: 19180875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. New peer review law provides immunity with obligations. Valiant C Physician Exec; 1987; 13(3):26-7. PubMed ID: 10312139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Duties and potential liability of nonhospital entities in credentialing physicians. Griffith RL Med Staff Couns; 1991; 5(1):7-17. PubMed ID: 10160755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Medical staff peer review and federal antitrust scrutiny. LaCava FW Bull Am Coll Surg; 1985 Aug; 70(8):40-1. PubMed ID: 10272117 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Medical staff privileges and the antitrust laws: does the Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine apply? Meghrigian AG Med Staff Couns; 1992; 6(2):9-16. PubMed ID: 10116795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Data bank has operational impact. Proper peer review can protect hospitals from antitrust and defamation suits. Purtell DL Health Prog; 1990 Nov; 71(9):66-71. PubMed ID: 10107457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986: an overview of its immunity provisions. Miles JJ Med Staff Couns; 1987; 1(2):1-9. PubMed ID: 10284641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of medical staff departments in peer review. Dimond FC QRC Advis; 1992 Jun; 8(8):6-8. PubMed ID: 10119299 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical staff motivation and peer review. Merry MD Top Health Rec Manage; 1984 Dec; 5(2):21-31. PubMed ID: 10268842 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The importance of hospital peer review. Board of Trustees, American Medical Association. QA Rev; 1991 Jul; 3(5):3. PubMed ID: 10114869 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Peer review splits Calif. medical community. Burda D Mod Healthc; 1988 Oct; 18(44):98. PubMed ID: 10290221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]