131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35766586)
1. A systematic review on efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of office-based laryngeal biopsy.
Swaminathan R; Rosa Opatha S; Mughal Z; Prasad S
J Laryngol Otol; 2023 Sep; 137(9):946-952. PubMed ID: 35766586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In-office cup biopsy and laryngeal cytology versus operating room biopsy for the diagnosis of pharyngolaryngeal tumors: Efficacy and cost-effectiveness.
Castillo Farías F; Cobeta I; Souviron R; Barberá R; Mora E; Benito A; Royuela A
Head Neck; 2015 Oct; 37(10):1483-7. PubMed ID: 24889909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In-office biopsy of upper airway lesions: safety, tolerance, and effect on time to treatment.
Lippert D; Hoffman MR; Dang P; McCulloch TM; Hartig GK; Dailey SH
Laryngoscope; 2015 Apr; 125(4):919-23. PubMed ID: 25376857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability of a transnasal flexible fiberoptic in-office laryngeal biopsy.
Cohen JT; Safadi A; Fliss DM; Gil Z; Horowitz G
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Apr; 139(4):341-5. PubMed ID: 23519690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laryngeal biopsies: are we doing more, and why? A decade of results.
Lim S; Sau P; Cooper L; McPhaden A; MacKenzie K
J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Jan; 130(1):100-3. PubMed ID: 26646573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A systematic review: impact of in-office biopsy on safety and waiting times in head and neck cancer.
Lim AE; Rogers ADG; Owusu-Ayim M; Ranjan S; Manickavasagam J; Montgomery J
J Laryngol Otol; 2022 Oct; 136(10):909-916. PubMed ID: 35000641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of in-office cup forcep biopsies versus operating room biopsies for laryngopharyngeal tumors.
Naidu H; Noordzij JP; Samim A; Jalisi S; Grillone GA
J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):604-6. PubMed ID: 22521530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adverse Events and Time to Diagnosis of In-Office Laryngeal Biopsy Procedures.
Cohen JT; Bishara T; Trushin V; Benyamini L
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2018 Jul; 159(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 29533699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Office-based biopsies for laryngeal lesions: Analysis of consecutive 581 cases.
Cha W; Yoon BW; Jang JY; Lee JC; Lee BJ; Wang SG; Cho JK; Cho I
Laryngoscope; 2016 Nov; 126(11):2513-2519. PubMed ID: 27113333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Flexible fiberoptic in-office laryngeal biopsy].
Cohen JT; Fliss DM
Harefuah; 2009 Jan; 148(1):18-20, 89. PubMed ID: 19320383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Routine restaging after primary non-surgical treatment of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma-a review.
Seebauer CT; Hackenberg B; Grosse J; Rennert J; Jung EM; Ugele I; Michaelides I; Mehanna H; Hautmann MG; Bohr C; Künzel J
Strahlenther Onkol; 2021 Mar; 197(3):167-176. PubMed ID: 33216194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Total Laryngectomy for Treatment of T4 Laryngeal Cancer: Trends and Survival Outcomes.
Badwal JS
Pol Przegl Chir; 2018 Aug; 91(3):30-37. PubMed ID: 31243165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety of flexible endoscopic biopsy of the pharynx and larynx under topical anesthesia.
Wellenstein DJ; de Witt JK; Schutte HW; Honings J; van den Hoogen FJA; Marres HAM; Takes RP; van den Broek GB
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Sep; 274(9):3471-3476. PubMed ID: 28639059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Carcinosarcomas of the larynx: systematic review of the literature of a rare nosologic entity.
Colizza A; Gilardi A; Greco A; Cialente F; Zoccali F; Ralli M; Minni A; de Vincentiis M
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Mar; 279(3):1167-1173. PubMed ID: 34351467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic accuracy outcomes of office-based (outpatient) biopsies in patients with laryngopharyngeal lesions: A systematic review.
Owusu-Ayim M; Ranjan SR; Lim AE; Rogers ADG; Montgomery J; Flach S; Manickavasagam J
Clin Otolaryngol; 2022 Mar; 47(2):264-278. PubMed ID: 34812583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Office-Based Procedures for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Laryngeal Pathology.
Wellenstein DJ; Schutte HW; Takes RP; Honings J; Marres HAM; Burns JA; van den Broek GB
J Voice; 2018 Jul; 32(4):502-513. PubMed ID: 28935210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Spontaneous regression of laryngeal carcinoma in 10 year old boy: A case report and review of literature.
Uloza V; Ulozaite N; Vaitkus S; Sarauskas V
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 103():10-13. PubMed ID: 29224746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness of dual-head 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET for the detection of recurrent laryngeal cancer.
Bongers V; Hobbelink MG; van Rijk PP; Hordijk GJ
Cancer Biother Radiopharm; 2002 Jun; 17(3):303-6. PubMed ID: 12136522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tumiform Laryngeal Histoplasmosis.
Sharma S; Gajendra S; Lipi L; Sachdev R
Int J Surg Pathol; 2017 Jun; 25(4):321-322. PubMed ID: 27831533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
