These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35767125)

  • 1. Evaluation of resolution characteristics of digital intraoral radiographic images using a task transfer function.
    Kuramoto T; Takarabe S; Tsuru H; Shibayama Y; Kato T; Yoshiura K
    Oral Radiol; 2022 Oct; 38(4):638-644. PubMed ID: 35767125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of differences in pixel size on image characteristics of digital intraoral radiographic systems: a physical and visual evaluation.
    Kuramoto T; Takarabe S; Okamura K; Shiotsuki K; Shibayama Y; Tsuru H; Akamine H; Tatsumi M; Kato T; Morishita J; Yoshiura K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 Sep; 49(6):20190378. PubMed ID: 32302229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of software in quality assurance for indirect digital intraoral imaging.
    Buchanan A; Hancock R; Kalathingal S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2020 Sep; 130(3):313-321. PubMed ID: 32430258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of K-shell absorption edge filters on image quality in digital intraoral radiography.
    Shibuya H; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Sep; 90(3):377-84. PubMed ID: 10982962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of phosphor plate-based radiographic image specifications on fractal analysis of alveolar bone.
    Oliveira-Santos N; Michels M; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F; Oliveira ML
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2019 Oct; 128(4):418-423. PubMed ID: 31324583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship between image information content and observer performance in digital intraoral radiography.
    Takarabe S; Okamura K; Kuramoto T; Tokumori K; Kato T; Yoshiura K
    Oral Radiol; 2023 Jul; 39(3):491-503. PubMed ID: 36289169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improvements in image quality after optimization in digital intraoral radiographs.
    Barrineau AB; Mah P; Mallya SM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2023 Jan; 154(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 36402578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The modulation transfer function and signal-to-noise ratio of different digital filters: a technical approach.
    Brüllmann DD; d'Hoedt B
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 May; 40(4):222-9. PubMed ID: 21493878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New method of evaluating edge-preserving adaptive filters for computed tomography (CT): digital phantom method.
    Okumura M; Ota T; Tsukagoshi S; Katada K
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2006 Jul; 62(7):971-8. PubMed ID: 16874286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variable-resolution cone-beam computerized tomography with enhancement filtration compared with intraoral photostimulable phosphor radiography in detection of transverse root fractures in an in vitro model.
    Wenzel A; Haiter-Neto F; Frydenberg M; Kirkevang LL
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Dec; 108(6):939-45. PubMed ID: 19875312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Numerical Evaluation of Image Contrast for Thicker and Thinner Objects among Current Intraoral Digital Imaging Systems.
    Dashpuntsag O; Yoshida M; Kasai R; Maeda N; Hosoki H; Honda E
    Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():5215413. PubMed ID: 28497053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comments on noise and resolution of the DenOptix radiography system.
    Couture RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Jun; 95(6):746-51. PubMed ID: 12789159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of different spatial resolutions and enhancement filters on radiographic detection of simulated furcation defects with intraoral digital radiography.
    Santos CV; Correia VAG; Felizardo HMA; Esteves A; Rossi-Júnior WC; Pigossi SC; Gaêta-Araujo H
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2023 Oct; 136(4):518-528. PubMed ID: 37407350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Efficiency and Image Quality of Photostimulable Phosphor Plate and Charge-Coupled Device Receptors in Dental Radiography.
    Zhang W; Huynh C; Jadhav A; Pinales J; Arvizu L; Tsai J; Flores N
    J Dent Educ; 2019 Oct; 83(10):1205-1212. PubMed ID: 31235501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development, validation, and relevance of in vivo low-contrast task transfer function to estimate detectability in clinical CT images.
    Smith TB; Abadi E; Solomon J; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2021 Dec; 48(12):7698-7711. PubMed ID: 34713908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterization and preliminary imaging evaluation of a clinical prototype stationary intraoral tomosynthesis system.
    Inscoe CR; Platin E; Mauriello SM; Broome A; Mol A; Gaalaas LR; Regan Anderson MW; Puett C; Lu J; Zhou O
    Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):5172-5185. PubMed ID: 30259988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of image defects in digital intraoral radiography based on photostimulable phosphor plates.
    Tashiro M; Nakatani A; Sugiura K; Nakayama E
    Oral Radiol; 2023 Apr; 39(2):355-363. PubMed ID: 35948784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality assurance phantom for digital dental imaging.
    Mah P; McDavid WD; Dove SB
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Nov; 112(5):632-9. PubMed ID: 21862364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of image quality parameters of representative intraoral digital radiographic systems.
    Udupa H; Mah P; Dove SB; McDavid WD
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Dec; 116(6):774-83. PubMed ID: 24237729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional and digital radiography for detecting misfit between the tooth and restoration in metal-restored teeth.
    Liedke GS; Spin-Neto R; Vizzotto MB; Da Silveira PF; Silveira HE; Wenzel A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 25311793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.