These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35767270)

  • 1. Internet Searches for Abortion Medications Following the Leaked Supreme Court of the United States Draft Ruling.
    Poliak A; Satybaldiyeva N; Strathdee SA; Leas EC; Rao R; Smith D; Ayers JW
    JAMA Intern Med; 2022 Sep; 182(9):1002-1004. PubMed ID: 35767270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Leaked Supreme Court Ruling Opinion: Implications for Abortion Access.
    Reingold RB; Gostin LO
    JAMA; 2022 Jul; 328(1):13-14. PubMed ID: 35666522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?
    Gupta S; Perry B; Simon K
    JAMA Health Forum; 2023 Apr; 4(4):e230518. PubMed ID: 37115538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. US Supreme Court ends constitutional right to abortion.
    Tanne JH
    BMJ; 2022 Jun; 377():o1575. PubMed ID: 35760421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Texas Supreme Court blocks permitted abortion for woman with non-viable pregnancy.
    Tanne JH
    BMJ; 2023 Dec; 383():2920. PubMed ID: 38081657
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. US abortion: Leaked document shows Supreme Court plans to overturn rights.
    Tanne JH
    BMJ; 2022 May; 377():o1122. PubMed ID: 35508316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Texas court grants woman with non-viable pregnancy right to abortion.
    Tanne JH
    BMJ; 2023 Dec; 383():2908. PubMed ID: 38084504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. We're horrified by the rejection of Roe v Wade-but abortion is not a universal right in the UK.
    Graham S
    BMJ; 2022 Aug; 378():o1945. PubMed ID: 35977739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The fall of Roe
    Lewandowska M
    BMJ; 2022 Jun; 377():o1608. PubMed ID: 35768122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. United States Supreme Court and abortion. 3.
    Holman EJ
    JAMA; 1973 Jul; 225(4):447-8. PubMed ID: 4741028
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The US Supreme Court is wrong to disregard evidence on the harm of banning abortion.
    Nature; 2022 May; 605(7909):193-194. PubMed ID: 35513454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Challenge of Emergency Abortion Care Following the Dobbs Ruling.
    MacDonald A; Gershengorn HB; Ashana DC
    JAMA; 2022 Nov; 328(17):1691-1692. PubMed ID: 36318126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The judgment of the Supreme Court American statement on abortion: an ″earthquake″ with unintended consequences].
    Díez Fernández JA
    Cuad Bioet; 2022; 33(109):351-352. PubMed ID: 36493419
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Abortion Convictions Before Roe.
    Linton PB
    Issues Law Med; 2021; 36(1):77-110. PubMed ID: 33939343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. US abortion law: leaked opinion sparks protests and calls for changes to the Supreme Court.
    Tanne JH
    BMJ; 2022 May; 377():o1159. PubMed ID: 35534036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Abortion 1980: the debate continues.
    Healey JM
    Conn Med; 1980 Sep; 44(9):605. PubMed ID: 7408487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. United States Supreme Court and abortion. 1.
    Holman EJ
    JAMA; 1973 Jul; 225(2):215-6. PubMed ID: 4740289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What overturning
    Compton S; Greer SL
    BMJ; 2022 May; 377():o1255. PubMed ID: 35589112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Historical Feature: A Long History of Abortion.
    McSpedon C
    Am J Nurs; 2022 Oct; 122(10):42-44. PubMed ID: 36136024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around.
    Horan DJ; Marzen TJ
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.