235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35767346)
1. Monitoring and Managing Lifestyle Behaviors Using Wearable Activity Trackers: Mixed Methods Study of Views From the Huntington Disease Community.
Morgan-Jones P; Jones A; Busse M; Mills L; Pallmann P; Drew C; Arnesen A; Wood F;
JMIR Form Res; 2022 Jun; 6(6):e36870. PubMed ID: 35767346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acceptance of Commercially Available Wearable Activity Trackers Among Adults Aged Over 50 and With Chronic Illness: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation.
Mercer K; Giangregorio L; Schneider E; Chilana P; Li M; Grindrod K
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 Jan; 4(1):e7. PubMed ID: 26818775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The Use of Wearable Activity Trackers Among Older Adults: Focus Group Study of Tracker Perceptions, Motivators, and Barriers in the Maintenance Stage of Behavior Change.
Kononova A; Li L; Kamp K; Bowen M; Rikard RV; Cotten S; Peng W
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Apr; 7(4):e9832. PubMed ID: 30950807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Views and Needs of People With Parkinson Disease Regarding Wearable Devices for Disease Monitoring: Mixed Methods Exploration.
Kenny L; Moore K; O' Riordan C; Fox S; Barton J; Tedesco S; Sica M; Crowe C; Alamäki A; Condell J; Nordström A; Timmons S
JMIR Form Res; 2022 Jan; 6(1):e27418. PubMed ID: 34989693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Parental Perspectives of a Wearable Activity Tracker for Children Younger Than 13 Years: Acceptability and Usability Study.
Mackintosh KA; Chappel SE; Salmon J; Timperio A; Ball K; Brown H; Macfarlane S; Ridgers ND
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2019 Nov; 7(11):e13858. PubMed ID: 31682585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Older Adults' Experiences With Using Wearable Devices: Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-synthesis.
Moore K; O'Shea E; Kenny L; Barton J; Tedesco S; Sica M; Crowe C; Alamäki A; Condell J; Nordström A; Timmons S
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jun; 9(6):e23832. PubMed ID: 34081020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Using the Technology Acceptance Model to Explore Adolescents' Perspectives on Combining Technologies for Physical Activity Promotion Within an Intervention: Usability Study.
Drehlich M; Naraine M; Rowe K; Lai SK; Salmon J; Brown H; Koorts H; Macfarlane S; Ridgers ND
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Mar; 22(3):e15552. PubMed ID: 32141834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Habit Formation in Wearable Activity Tracker Use Among Older Adults: Qualitative Study.
Peng W; Li L; Kononova A; Cotten S; Kamp K; Bowen M
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2021 Jan; 9(1):e22488. PubMed ID: 33464216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can a Free Wearable Activity Tracker Change Behavior? The Impact of Trackers on Adults in a Physician-Led Wellness Group.
Gualtieri L; Rosenbluth S; Phillips J
JMIR Res Protoc; 2016 Nov; 5(4):e237. PubMed ID: 27903490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. User Acceptance of Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: Mixed Method Study.
Puri A; Kim B; Nguyen O; Stolee P; Tung J; Lee J
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2017 Nov; 5(11):e173. PubMed ID: 29141837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Users' experiences of wearable activity trackers: a cross-sectional study.
Maher C; Ryan J; Ambrosi C; Edney S
BMC Public Health; 2017 Nov; 17(1):880. PubMed ID: 29141607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diffusion of the Digital Health Self-Tracking Movement in Canada: Results of a National Survey.
Paré G; Leaver C; Bourget C
J Med Internet Res; 2018 May; 20(5):e177. PubMed ID: 29720359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perceived user preferences and usability evaluation of mainstream wearable devices for health monitoring.
Jia Y; Wang W; Wen D; Liang L; Gao L; Lei J
PeerJ; 2018; 6():e5350. PubMed ID: 30065893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy and acceptability of using wearable activity trackers in older adults living in retirement communities: a mixed method study.
Zhang Z; Giordani B; Margulis A; Chen W
BMC Geriatr; 2022 Mar; 22(1):231. PubMed ID: 35313819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A qualitative evaluation of breast cancer survivors' acceptance of and preferences for consumer wearable technology activity trackers.
Nguyen NH; Hadgraft NT; Moore MM; Rosenberg DE; Lynch C; Reeves MM; Lynch BM
Support Care Cancer; 2017 Nov; 25(11):3375-3384. PubMed ID: 28540402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Social Group-Based Information-Motivation-Behavior Skill Intervention to Promote Acceptability and Adoption of Wearable Activity Trackers Among Middle-Aged and Older Adults: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.
Liao J; Xiao HY; Li XQ; Sun SH; Liu SX; Yang YJ; Xu DR
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2020 Apr; 8(4):e14969. PubMed ID: 32271151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Anxious or empowered? A cross-sectional study exploring how wearable activity trackers make their owners feel.
Ryan J; Edney S; Maher C
BMC Psychol; 2019 Jul; 7(1):42. PubMed ID: 31269972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reporting adherence, validity and physical activity measures of wearable activity trackers in medical research: A systematic review.
Chan A; Chan D; Lee H; Ng CC; Yeo AHL
Int J Med Inform; 2022 Apr; 160():104696. PubMed ID: 35121356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Wearable Activity Tracker Use Among Australian Adolescents: Usability and Acceptability Study.
Ridgers ND; Timperio A; Brown H; Ball K; Macfarlane S; Lai SK; Richards K; Mackintosh KA; McNarry MA; Foster M; Salmon J
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2018 Apr; 6(4):e86. PubMed ID: 29643054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Data management and wearables in older adults: A systematic review.
Alharbi M; Straiton N; Smith S; Neubeck L; Gallagher R
Maturitas; 2019 Jun; 124():100-110. PubMed ID: 30910279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
