213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35767600)
1. Performance of a multisensor smart ring to evaluate sleep: in-lab and home-based evaluation of generalized and personalized algorithms.
Grandner MA; Bromberg Z; Hadley A; Morrell Z; Graf A; Hutchison S; Freckleton D
Sleep; 2023 Jan; 46(1):. PubMed ID: 35767600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detecting sleep using heart rate and motion data from multisensor consumer-grade wearables, relative to wrist actigraphy and polysomnography.
Roberts DM; Schade MM; Mathew GM; Gartenberg D; Buxton OM
Sleep; 2020 Jul; 43(7):. PubMed ID: 32215550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Selecting a sleep tracker from EEG-based, iteratively improved, low-cost multisensor, and actigraphy-only devices.
Ong JL; Golkashani HA; Ghorbani S; Wong KF; Chee NIYN; Willoughby AR; Chee MWL
Sleep Health; 2024 Feb; 10(1):9-23. PubMed ID: 38087674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of Fitbit Charge 2 Sleep and Heart Rate Estimates Against Polysomnographic Measures in Shift Workers: Naturalistic Study.
Stucky B; Clark I; Azza Y; Karlen W; Achermann P; Kleim B; Landolt HP
J Med Internet Res; 2021 Oct; 23(10):e26476. PubMed ID: 34609317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A validation study of Fitbit Charge 2™ compared with polysomnography in adults.
de Zambotti M; Goldstone A; Claudatos S; Colrain IM; Baker FC
Chronobiol Int; 2018 Apr; 35(4):465-476. PubMed ID: 29235907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity and reliability of the Oura Ring Generation 3 (Gen3) with Oura sleep staging algorithm 2.0 (OSSA 2.0) when compared to multi-night ambulatory polysomnography: A validation study of 96 participants and 421,045 epochs.
Svensson T; Madhawa K; Nt H; Chung UI; Svensson AK
Sleep Med; 2024 Mar; 115():251-263. PubMed ID: 38382312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of a Consumer Sleep Wearable Device With Actigraphy and Polysomnography in Adolescents Across Sleep Opportunity Manipulations.
Lee XK; Chee NIYN; Ong JL; Teo TB; van Rijn E; Lo JC; Chee MWL
J Clin Sleep Med; 2019 Sep; 15(9):1337-1346. PubMed ID: 31538605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of Four Commercial Wearable Sleep-Tracking Devices Tested Under Unrestricted Conditions at Home in Healthy Young Adults.
Chinoy ED; Cuellar JA; Jameson JT; Markwald RR
Nat Sci Sleep; 2022; 14():493-516. PubMed ID: 35345630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of seven consumer sleep-tracking devices compared with polysomnography.
Chinoy ED; Cuellar JA; Huwa KE; Jameson JT; Watson CH; Bessman SC; Hirsch DA; Cooper AD; Drummond SPA; Markwald RR
Sleep; 2021 May; 44(5):. PubMed ID: 33378539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Validation Study of a Commercial Wearable Device to Automatically Detect and Estimate Sleep.
Miller DJ; Roach GD; Lastella M; Scanlan AT; Bellenger CR; Halson SL; Sargent C
Biosensors (Basel); 2021 Jun; 11(6):. PubMed ID: 34201016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multi-Night Validation of a Sleep Tracking Ring in Adolescents Compared with a Research Actigraph and Polysomnography.
Chee NIYN; Ghorbani S; Golkashani HA; Leong RLF; Ong JL; Chee MWL
Nat Sci Sleep; 2021; 13():177-190. PubMed ID: 33623459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Actigraphy-based sleep estimation in adolescents and adults: a comparison with polysomnography using two scoring algorithms.
Quante M; Kaplan ER; Cailler M; Rueschman M; Wang R; Weng J; Taveras EM; Redline S
Nat Sci Sleep; 2018; 10():13-20. PubMed ID: 29403321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance evaluation of Fitbit Charge 3 and actigraphy vs. polysomnography: Sensitivity, specificity, and reliability across participants and nights.
Eylon G; Tikotzky L; Dinstein I
Sleep Health; 2023 Aug; 9(4):407-416. PubMed ID: 37270397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Sleep of the Ring: Comparison of the ŌURA Sleep Tracker Against Polysomnography.
de Zambotti M; Rosas L; Colrain IM; Baker FC
Behav Sleep Med; 2019; 17(2):124-136. PubMed ID: 28323455
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of Fitbit Charge 3 against polysomnography in measuring sleep in adolescent boys and girls.
Menghini L; Yuksel D; Goldstone A; Baker FC; de Zambotti M
Chronobiol Int; 2021 Jul; 38(7):1010-1022. PubMed ID: 33792456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Validation of Zulu Watch against Polysomnography and Actigraphy for On-Wrist Sleep-Wake Determination and Sleep-Depth Estimation.
Devine JK; Chinoy ED; Markwald RR; Schwartz LP; Hursh SR
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Dec; 21(1):. PubMed ID: 33375557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A novel machine learning unsupervised algorithm for sleep/wake identification using actigraphy.
Li X; Zhang Y; Jiang F; Zhao H
Chronobiol Int; 2020 Jul; 37(7):1002-1015. PubMed ID: 32342702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sleep assessment by means of a wrist actigraphy-based algorithm: agreement with polysomnography in an ambulatory study on older adults.
Regalia G; Gerboni G; Migliorini M; Lai M; Pham J; Puri N; Pavlova MK; Picard RW; Sarkis RA; Onorati F
Chronobiol Int; 2021 Mar; 38(3):400-414. PubMed ID: 33213222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of Fitbit Charge 4 for assessing sleep in Chinese patients with chronic insomnia: A comparison against polysomnography and actigraphy.
Dong X; Yang S; Guo Y; Lv P; Wang M; Li Y
PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0275287. PubMed ID: 36256631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of a device-agnostic approach to predict sleep from raw accelerometry data collected by Apple Watch Series 7, Garmin Vivoactive 4, and ActiGraph GT9X Link in children with sleep disruptions.
Weaver RG; de Zambotti M; White J; Finnegan O; Nelakuditi S; Zhu X; Burkart S; Beets M; Brown D; Pate RR; Welk GJ; Ghosal R; Wang Y; Armstrong B; Adams EL; Reesor-Oyer L; Pfledderer C; Dugger R; Bastyr M; von Klinggraeff L; Parker H
Sleep Health; 2023 Aug; 9(4):417-429. PubMed ID: 37391280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
