BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35767984)

  • 1. Assessing liver fibrosis distribution through liver elasticity estimates obtained using a biomechanical model of respiratory motion with magnetic resonance elastography.
    Fujimoto K; Shiinoki T; Yuasa Y; Kawazoe Y; Yamane M; Sera T; Tanaka H
    Phys Med Biol; 2022 Jul; 67(15):. PubMed ID: 35767984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of liver elasticity using the finite element method and four-dimensional computed tomography images as a biomarker of liver fibrosis.
    Fujimoto K; Shiinoki T; Yuasa Y; Tanaka H
    Med Phys; 2021 Mar; 48(3):1286-1298. PubMed ID: 33449406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3.
    McGrath DM; Bradley CR; Francis ST
    Phys Med Biol; 2021 Nov; 66(22):. PubMed ID: 34678798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of C-SENSE Accelerated Rapid Liver Shear Stiffness Measurement Using Displacement Wave Polarity-Inversion Motion Encoding: An Evaluation Study.
    Pednekar A; Gandhi D; Wang H; Tkach JA; Trout AT; Dillman JR
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Sep; 56(3):754-765. PubMed ID: 35089614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative MRI of the liver: Evaluation of extracellular volume fraction and other quantitative parameters in comparison to MR elastography for the assessment of hepatopathy.
    Kupczyk PA; Mesropyan N; Isaak A; Endler C; Faron A; Kuetting D; Sprinkart AM; Mädler B; Thomas D; Attenberger UI; Luetkens JA
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Apr; 77():7-13. PubMed ID: 33309923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. T1 mapping, T2 mapping and MR elastography of the liver for detection and staging of liver fibrosis.
    Hoffman DH; Ayoola A; Nickel D; Han F; Chandarana H; Shanbhogue KP
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Mar; 45(3):692-700. PubMed ID: 31875241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality Control of Magnetic Resonance Elastography Using Percent Measurable Liver Volume Estimation.
    Ballard DH; Ludwig DR; Fraum TJ; Salter A; Narra VR; Shetty AS
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Jun; 55(6):1890-1899. PubMed ID: 34704644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospective comparison of transient, point shear wave, and magnetic resonance elastography for staging liver fibrosis.
    Lefebvre T; Wartelle-Bladou C; Wong P; Sebastiani G; Giard JM; Castel H; Murphy-Lavallée J; Olivié D; Ilinca A; Sylvestre MP; Gilbert G; Gao ZH; Nguyen BN; Cloutier G; Tang A
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Dec; 29(12):6477-6488. PubMed ID: 31278577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis: comparison of MR elastography to transient elastography and intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI.
    Fu F; Li X; Chen C; Bai Y; Liu Q; Shi D; Sang J; Wang K; Wang M
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Jan; 45(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 31372777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of 2D Shear Wave Elastography, Transient Elastography, and MR Elastography for the Diagnosis of Fibrosis in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.
    Furlan A; Tublin ME; Yu L; Chopra KB; Lippello A; Behari J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jan; 214(1):W20-W26. PubMed ID: 31714842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic accuracy of elastography and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with NAFLD: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Selvaraj EA; Mózes FE; Jayaswal ANA; Zafarmand MH; Vali Y; Lee JA; Levick CK; Young LAJ; Palaniyappan N; Liu CH; Aithal GP; Romero-Gómez M; Brosnan MJ; Tuthill TA; Anstee QM; Neubauer S; Harrison SA; Bossuyt PM; Pavlides M;
    J Hepatol; 2021 Oct; 75(4):770-785. PubMed ID: 33991635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnetic resonance elastography in the assessment of hepatic fibrosis: a study comparing transient elastography and histological data in the same patients.
    Toguchi M; Tsurusaki M; Yada N; Sofue K; Hyodo T; Onoda M; Numoto I; Matsuki M; Imaoka I; Kudo M; Murakami T
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Jun; 42(6):1659-1666. PubMed ID: 28144720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Respiratory-triggered spin-echo echo-planar imaging-based mr elastography for evaluating liver stiffness.
    Wang H; Tkach JA; Trout AT; Dumoulin CL; Dillman JR
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Aug; 50(2):391-396. PubMed ID: 30584687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of breath holding at the end of the inspiration and expiration phases on liver stiffness measured by 2D-MR elastography.
    Ren H; Yang D; Xu H; Pang K; Shi Y; Guan Q; Yang Z
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Jun; 46(6):2516-2526. PubMed ID: 33386913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the efficacy of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance elastography in the detection and staging of hepatic fibrosis.
    Wu WP; Hoi CI; Chen RC; Lin CP; Chou CT
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Oct; 96(42):e8339. PubMed ID: 29049250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robustness of MR Elastography in the Healthy Brain: Repeatability, Reliability, and Effect of Different Reconstruction Methods.
    Svensson SF; De Arcos J; Darwish OI; Fraser-Green J; Storås TH; Holm S; Vik-Mo EO; Sinkus R; Emblem KE
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 May; 53(5):1510-1521. PubMed ID: 33403750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of liver T1 mapping in fontan patients and its correlation with magnetic resonance elastography-derived liver stiffness.
    Ramachandran P; Serai SD; Veldtman GR; Lang SM; Mazur W; Trout AT; Dillman JR; Fleck RJ; Taylor MD; Alsaied T; Moore RA
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Jul; 44(7):2403-2408. PubMed ID: 30903232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nonlinear multiscale regularisation in MR elastography: Towards fine feature mapping.
    Barnhill E; Hollis L; Sack I; Braun J; Hoskins PR; Pankaj P; Brown C; van Beek EJR; Roberts N
    Med Image Anal; 2017 Jan; 35():133-145. PubMed ID: 27376240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnetic Resonance Elastography of the Liver: Qualitative and Quantitative Comparison of Gradient Echo and Spin Echo Echoplanar Imaging Sequences.
    Wagner M; Besa C; Bou Ayache J; Yasar TK; Bane O; Fung M; Ehman RL; Taouli B
    Invest Radiol; 2016 Sep; 51(9):575-81. PubMed ID: 26982699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MR elastography, T1 and T2 relaxometry of liver: role in noninvasive assessment of liver function and portal hypertension.
    Hoffman DH; Ayoola A; Nickel D; Han F; Chandarana H; Babb J; Shanbhogue KP
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Sep; 45(9):2680-2687. PubMed ID: 32274552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.