These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35768278)

  • 1. Comparison of the accuracy of different handheld-type scanners in three-dimensional facial image recognition.
    Tsuchida Y; Shiozawa M; Handa K; Takahashi H; Nikawa H
    J Prosthodont Res; 2023 Apr; 67(2):222-230. PubMed ID: 35768278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reliability and validity of handheld structured light scanners and a static stereophotogrammetry system in facial three-dimensional surface imaging.
    Schipper JAM; Merema BJ; Hollander MHJ; Spijkervet FKL; Dijkstra PU; Jansma J; Schepers RH; Kraeima J
    Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):8172. PubMed ID: 38589391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the accuracy of a mobile and a stationary system for three-dimensional facial scanning.
    Modabber A; Peters F; Kniha K; Goloborodko E; Ghassemi A; Lethaus B; Hölzle F; Möhlhenrich SC
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 44(10):1719-1724. PubMed ID: 27614543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of two handheld devices against a non-portable three-dimensional surface scanner and assessment of potential use for intraoperative facial imaging.
    Koban KC; Perko P; Etzel L; Li Z; Schenck TL; Giunta RE
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2020 Jan; 73(1):141-148. PubMed ID: 31519501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Accuracy of Digital Face Scans Obtained from 3D Scanners: An In Vitro Study.
    Amornvit P; Sanohkan S
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Dec; 16(24):. PubMed ID: 31842255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Trueness of 4 three-dimensional facial scanners: an
    Zhao RF; Wang X; Ma D; Fang MJ; Bai SZ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Oct; 57(10):1036-1042. PubMed ID: 36266077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy, repeatability and reproducibility of a handheld three-dimensional facial imaging device: The Vectra H1.
    Savoldelli C; Benat G; Castillo L; Chamorey E; Lutz JC
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Sep; 120(4):289-296. PubMed ID: 30922712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of accuracy and speed between plaster casting, high-cost and low-cost 3D scanners to capture foot, ankle and lower leg morphology of children requiring ankle-foot orthoses.
    Farhan M; Wang JZ; Warncke R; Cheng TL; Burns J
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2024 Sep; 17(3):e70006. PubMed ID: 39192458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Portable three-dimensional imaging to monitor small volume enhancement in face, vulva, and hand: A comparative study.
    Almadori A; Speiser S; Ashby I; Lacher R; Bishop D; Mosahebi A; Butler PE
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Sep; 75(9):3574-3585. PubMed ID: 35659734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Evaluation of measurement accuracy of three facial scanners based on different scanning principles].
    Zhao YJ; Xiong YX; Yang HF; Wang Y
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2014 Feb; 46(1):76-80. PubMed ID: 24535353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative Analysis of Three Facial Scanners for Creating Digital Twins by Focusing on the Difference in Scanning Method.
    Cho RY; Byun SH; Yi SM; Ahn HJ; Nam YS; Park IY; On SW; Kim JC; Yang BE
    Bioengineering (Basel); 2023 Apr; 10(5):. PubMed ID: 37237615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-Dimensional Imaging of the Face: A Comparison Between Three Different Imaging Modalities.
    Verhulst A; Hol M; Vreeken R; Becking A; Ulrich D; Maal T
    Aesthet Surg J; 2018 May; 38(6):579-585. PubMed ID: 29360971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of RGB-D camera-based and stereophotogrammetric facial scanners: a comparative study.
    Pan F; Liu J; Cen Y; Chen Y; Cai R; Zhao Z; Liao W; Wang J
    J Dent; 2022 Dec; 127():104302. PubMed ID: 36152954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of a dual-structured light facial scanner and interexaminer reliability.
    Piedra-Cascón W; Meyer MJ; Methani MM; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):567-574. PubMed ID: 31918895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of Mobile Device-Compatible 3D Scanners for Facial Digitization: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Mai HN; Lee DH
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Oct; 22(10):e22228. PubMed ID: 33095178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accuracy of capturing nasal, orbital, and auricular defects with extra- and intraoral optical scanners and smartphone: An in vitro study.
    Unkovskiy A; Spintzyk S; Beuer F; Huettig F; Röhler A; Kraemer-Fernandez P
    J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103916. PubMed ID: 34875273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of Connecting Two Standalone Mobile Three-Dimensional Scanners on Accuracy Comparing with a Standard Device in Facial Scanning.
    Modabber A; Peters F; Brokmeier A; Goloborodko E; Ghassemi A; Lethaus B; Hölzle F; Möhlhenrich SC
    J Oral Maxillofac Res; 2016; 7(4):e4. PubMed ID: 28154748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Preliminary evaluation of the trueness of 5 chairside 3D facial scanning techniques].
    Wen AN; Liu W; Liu DW; Zhu YJ; Xiao N; Wang Y; Zhao YJ
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2023 Apr; 55(2):343-350. PubMed ID: 37042148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validity and reliability of a novel 3D scanner for assessment of the shape and volume of amputees' residual limb models.
    Seminati E; Canepa Talamas D; Young M; Twiste M; Dhokia V; Bilzon JLJ
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0184498. PubMed ID: 28886154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro comparison of the accuracy (trueness and precision) of six extraoral dental scanners with different scanning technologies.
    González de Villaumbrosia P; Martínez-Rus F; García-Orejas A; Salido MP; Pradíes G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Oct; 116(4):543-550.e1. PubMed ID: 27112413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.