These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35768659)

  • 1. Both task-irrelevant and task-relevant information trigger reactive conflict adaptation in the item-specific proportion-congruent paradigm.
    Spinelli G; Morton JB; Lupker SJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Dec; 29(6):2133-2145. PubMed ID: 35768659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Item-specific control of attention in the Stroop task: Contingency learning is not the whole story in the item-specific proportion-congruent effect.
    Spinelli G; Lupker SJ
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Apr; 48(3):426-435. PubMed ID: 31705394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Congruency precues moderate item-specific proportion congruency effects.
    Hutchison KA; Bugg JM; Lim YB; Olsen MR
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 May; 78(4):1087-103. PubMed ID: 26860710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robust evidence for proactive conflict adaptation in the proportion-congruent paradigm.
    Spinelli G; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 May; 49(5):675-700. PubMed ID: 35787140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Proactive control in the Stroop task: A conflict-frequency manipulation free of item-specific, contingency-learning, and color-word correlation confounds.
    Spinelli G; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Oct; 47(10):1550-1562. PubMed ID: 32150437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Converging evidence for control of color-word Stroop interference at the item level.
    Bugg JM; Hutchison KA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):433-49. PubMed ID: 22845037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The item-specific proportion congruency effect transfers to non-category members based on broad visual similarity.
    Cochrane BA; Pratt J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Oct; 29(5):1821-1830. PubMed ID: 35469093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Why it is too early to lose control in accounts of item-specific proportion congruency effects.
    Bugg JM; Jacoby LL; Chanani S
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):844-59. PubMed ID: 20718569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Context-specific proportion congruent effects: Compound-cue contingency learning in disguise.
    Schmidt JR; Lemercier C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 May; 72(5):1119-1130. PubMed ID: 29926760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transfer of learned cognitive control settings within and between tasks.
    Ileri-Tayar M; Moss C; Bugg JM
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2022 Dec; 196():107689. PubMed ID: 36374800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Working memory load dissociates contingency learning and item-specific proportion-congruent effects.
    Spinelli G; Krishna K; Perry JR; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2020 Nov; 46(11):2007-2033. PubMed ID: 32658541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Finding an interaction between Stroop congruency and flanker congruency requires a large congruency effect: A within-trial combination of conflict tasks.
    Rey-Mermet A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jul; 82(5):2271-2301. PubMed ID: 31974936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conflict modification: predictable production of congruent situations facilitates responding in a stroop task.
    Schmidts C; Foerster A; Kunde W
    Psychol Res; 2019 Nov; 83(8):1722-1732. PubMed ID: 29679142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Control processes through the suppression of the automatic response activation triggered by task-irrelevant information in the Simon-type tasks.
    Kim S; Lee SH; Cho YS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Nov; 162():51-61. PubMed ID: 26479902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The item-specific proportion congruency effect can be contaminated by short-term repetition priming.
    Cochrane BA; Pratt J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jan; 84(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 34820767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modulation of conflicts in the Stroop effect.
    Shichel I; Tzelgov J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():93-102. PubMed ID: 29078981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Event-related potentials as brain correlates of item specific proportion congruent effects.
    Shedden JM; Milliken B; Watter S; Monteiro S
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Dec; 22(4):1442-55. PubMed ID: 24177235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stop interfering: Stroop task conflict independence from informational conflict and interference.
    Kalanthroff E; Goldfarb L; Usher M; Henik A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1356-67. PubMed ID: 23163896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Focusing on task conflict in the Stroop effect.
    Entel O; Tzelgov J
    Psychol Res; 2018 Mar; 82(2):284-295. PubMed ID: 27915364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Learning to be in control involves response-specific mechanisms.
    Ruitenberg MFL; Braem S; Du Cheyne H; Notebaert W
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Oct; 81(7):2526-2537. PubMed ID: 31073949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.