These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35769657)

  • 1. Short-Term Survivorship of 3D-Printed Titanium Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.
    Mancino F; Di Matteo V; Mocini F; Pietramala S; Singlitico A; De Fazio A; La Vergata V; Gasparini G; Maccauro G; De Martino I
    Orthop Rev (Pavia); 2022; 14(4):35891. PubMed ID: 35769657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Excellent two-year survivorship of 3D-printed metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty.
    Tetreault MW; Perry KI; Pagnano MW; Hanssen AD; Abdel MP
    Bone Joint J; 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):107-115. PubMed ID: 32475272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two-Year Survivorship and Outcomes of a Three-Dimensional Printed Metaphyseal Cone in the Setting of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Monárrez R; Bains SS; Chen Z; Sax OC; Salib CG; Mont MA; Delanois RE
    J Knee Surg; 2022 Dec; 35(14):1540-1543. PubMed ID: 36538941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short-term Outcomes of 3D-Printed Titanium Metaphyseal Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Remily EA; Dávila Castrodad IM; Mohamed NS; Wilkie WA; Kelemen MN; Delanois RE
    Orthopedics; 2021 Jan; 44(1):43-47. PubMed ID: 33284980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aseptic Loosening of Porous Metaphyseal Sleeves and Tantalum Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.
    Roach RP; Clair AJ; Behery OA; Thakkar SC; Iorio R; Deshmukh AJ
    J Knee Surg; 2021 Aug; 34(10):1033-1041. PubMed ID: 32074656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Metaphyseal Fixation Using Highly Porous Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Minimum Two Year Follow Up Study.
    Denehy KM; Abhari S; Krebs VE; Higuera-Rueda CA; Samuel LT; Sultan AA; Mont MA; Malkani AL
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Oct; 34(10):2439-2443. PubMed ID: 31000405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Are Trabecular Metal Cones a Valid Option to Treat Metaphyseal Bone Defects in Complex Primary and Revision Knee Arthroplasty?
    Bonanzinga T; Gehrke T; Zahar A; Zaffagnini S; Marcacci M; Haasper C
    Joints; 2018 Mar; 6(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 29675508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tantalum Cones for Severe Bone Defects in Revision Knee Arthroplasty: A Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.
    De Martino I; Mancino F; Di Matteo V; Singlitico A; Maccauro G; Gasparini G
    J Arthroplasty; 2023 May; 38(5):886-892. PubMed ID: 36481282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Survivorship and clinical outcomes of proximal femoral replacement in non-neoplastic primary and revision total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.
    Mancino F; Di Matteo V; Mocini F; Cacciola G; Malerba G; Perisano C; De Martino I
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Nov; 22(Suppl 2):933. PubMed ID: 34749680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Novel 3D-printed Stepped Porous Metal Cones and Metaphyseal Sleeves for Reconstruction of Severe Knee Bone Defects: Short-term Clinical Outcomes.
    Liu Y; Shen J; Tang Y; Zhang Y; Ma H; Zhou Y
    Orthop Surg; 2024 Jul; 16(7):1657-1664. PubMed ID: 38790115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Metaphyseal cones and sleeves in revision total knee arthroplasty: Two sides of the same coin? Complications, clinical and radiological results-a systematic review of the literature.
    Zanirato A; Formica M; Cavagnaro L; Divano S; Burastero G; Felli L
    Musculoskelet Surg; 2020 Apr; 104(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 30879231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survivorship and Clinical Outcomes of Custom Triflange Acetabular Components in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.
    De Martino I; Strigelli V; Cacciola G; Gu A; Bostrom MP; Sculco PK
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Oct; 34(10):2511-2518. PubMed ID: 31213338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical Survivorship of Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Hinged Knees and Tantalum Cones at Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up.
    Abdelaziz H; Jaramillo R; Gehrke T; Ohlmeier M; Citak M
    J Arthroplasty; 2019 Dec; 34(12):3018-3022. PubMed ID: 31351856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Survivorship of Metaphyseal Cones and Sleeves in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Heidenreich MJ; Lanting BA; McCalden RW; Naudie DD; Howard JL; MacDonald SJ; Vasarhelyi EM
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jun; 37(6S):S263-S269. PubMed ID: 35257822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Midterm Results of Porous Tantalum Femoral Cones in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Potter GD; Abdel MP; Lewallen DG; Hanssen AD
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2016 Aug; 98(15):1286-91. PubMed ID: 27489319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 3D-printed titanium metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty with cemented and cementless stems.
    Anderson LA; Christie M; Blackburn BE; Mahan C; Earl C; Pelt CE; Peters CL; Gililland J
    Bone Joint J; 2021 Jun; 103-B(6 Supple A):150-157. PubMed ID: 34053297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surgical Management of Tibial Bone Loss in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: Clinical Outcomes and Radiographic Analysis of Tantalum Cones, Titanium Cones and Titanium Sleeves.
    Gibon E; Vasilopoulos T; Sipavicius E; Deen JT; Prieto HA; Gray CF; Parvataneni HK; Pulido L
    Iowa Orthop J; 2022 Jun; 42(1):145-153. PubMed ID: 35821926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Survivorship and Radiographic Evaluation of Metaphyseal Cones With Short Cemented Stems in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
    Behery OA; Shing EZ; Yu Z; Springer BD; Fehring TK; Otero JE
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Feb; 37(2):330-335. PubMed ID: 34742873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High survival rate at mid-term follow up of porous tantalum cones for bone defects in revision total knee replacement: A 3-11 years follow up report.
    Rossi SMP; Perticarini L; Ghiara M; Jannelli E; Cortesi L; Benazzo F
    Knee; 2022 Mar; 35():175-182. PubMed ID: 35349974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Total knee arthroplasty revision with trabecular tantalum cones: Preliminary retrospective study of 51 patients from two centres with a minimal 2-year follow-up.
    Girerd D; Parratte S; Lunebourg A; Boureau F; Ollivier M; Pasquier G; Putman S; Migaud H; Argenson JN
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 Jun; 102(4):429-33. PubMed ID: 27052939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.