These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35769736)

  • 1. Modeling Not-Reached Items in Cognitive Diagnostic Assessments.
    Liang L; Lu J; Zhang J; Shi N
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():889673. PubMed ID: 35769736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling Incorporating Item-Level Missing Data Mechanism.
    Shan N; Wang X
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():564707. PubMed ID: 33329195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Mixture Response Time Process Model for Aberrant Behaviors and Item Nonresponses.
    Lu J; Wang C; Shi N
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(1):71-89. PubMed ID: 34355994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Utilizing response times in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing under the higher-order deterministic input, noisy 'and' gate model.
    Huang HY
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):109-141. PubMed ID: 30793768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cognitive diagnosis modelling incorporating item response times.
    Zhan P; Jiao H; Liao D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 May; 71(2):262-286. PubMed ID: 28872185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of item parameters and examinees' mastery probability in each domain of the Korean medical licensing examination using deterministic inputs, noisy and gate(DINA) model.
    Choi Y; Seo DG
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2020; 17():35. PubMed ID: 33197992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Sequential Process Model for Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment With Repeated Attempts.
    Hung SP; Huang HY
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 43(7):495-511. PubMed ID: 31534286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. On the Treatment of Missing Item Responses in Educational Large-Scale Assessment Data: An Illustrative Simulation Study and a Case Study Using PISA 2018 Mathematics Data.
    Robitzsch A
    Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ; 2021 Dec; 11(4):1653-1687. PubMed ID: 34940395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using Deterministic, Gated Item Response Theory Model to detect test cheating due to item compromise.
    Shu Z; Henson R; Luecht R
    Psychometrika; 2013 Jul; 78(3):481-97. PubMed ID: 25106396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling Omitted and Not-Reached Items in IRT Models.
    Rose N; von Davier M; Nagengast B
    Psychometrika; 2016 Nov; ():. PubMed ID: 27848151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Multiprocess Item Response Model for Not-Reached Items due to Time Limits and Quitting.
    Ulitzsch E; von Davier M; Pohl S
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Jun; 80(3):522-547. PubMed ID: 32425218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Mixture IRTree Model for Performance Decline and Nonignorable Missing Data.
    Huang HY
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2020 Dec; 80(6):1168-1195. PubMed ID: 33116331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Two-Dimensional Multiple-Choice Model Accounting for Omissions.
    Kreitchmann RS; Abad FJ; Ponsoda V
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():2540. PubMed ID: 30618961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using Response Times to Model Not-Reached Items due to Time Limits.
    Pohl S; Ulitzsch E; von Davier M
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):892-920. PubMed ID: 31054065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modeling Not-Reached Items in Timed Tests: A Response Time Censoring Approach.
    Guo J; Xu X; Ying Z; Zhang S
    Psychometrika; 2022 Sep; 87(3):835-867. PubMed ID: 34652612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sequential Bayesian Ability Estimation Applied to Mixed-Format Item Tests.
    Xiong J; Cohen AS; Xiong XM
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 Sep; 47(5-6):402-419. PubMed ID: 37810543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cognitive Diagnostic Models for Random Guessing Behaviors.
    Hsu CL; Jin KY; Chiu MM
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():570365. PubMed ID: 33101139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A mixture model for responses and response times with a higher-order ability structure to detect rapid guessing behaviour.
    Lu J; Wang C; Zhang J; Tao J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 May; 73(2):261-288. PubMed ID: 31385609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dual-Objective Item Selection Methods in Computerized Adaptive Test Using the Higher-Order Cognitive Diagnostic Models.
    Xi C; Tu D; Cai Y
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 Jul; 46(5):422-438. PubMed ID: 35812813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Non-ignorable missingness item response theory models for choice effects in examinee-selected items.
    Liu CW; Wang WC
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Nov; 70(3):499-524. PubMed ID: 28390145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.