These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35770369)

  • 1. Risk factors for revision surgery due to dislocation within 1 year after 111,711 primary total hip arthroplasties from 2005 to 2019: a study from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
    Thoen PS; Lygre SHL; Nordsletten L; Furnes O; Stigum H; Hallan G; Röhrl SM
    Acta Orthop; 2022 Jun; 93():593-601. PubMed ID: 35770369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The association of surgical approach and bearing size and type with dislocation in total hip arthroplasty for acute hip fracture.
    Rogmark C; Nåtman J; Jobory A; Hailer NP; Cnudde P
    Bone Joint J; 2022 Jul; 104-B(7):844-851. PubMed ID: 35775180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Femoral head size and surgical approach affect dislocation and overall revision rates in total hip arthroplasty: up to 9-year follow-up data of 269,280 procedures in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI).
    van Steenbergen LN; de Reus IM; Hannink G; Vehmeijer SB; Schreurs BW; Zijlstra WP
    Hip Int; 2023 Nov; 33(6):1056-1062. PubMed ID: 36935558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Comparison of Revision Rates and Dislocation After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with 28, 32, and 36-mm Femoral Heads and Different Cup Sizes: An Analysis of 188,591 Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties.
    Hoskins W; Rainbird S; Holder C; Stoney J; Graves SE; Bingham R
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2022 Aug; 104(16):1462-1474. PubMed ID: 35703140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. THA for a Fractured Femoral Neck: Comparing the Revision and Dislocation Rates of Standard-head, Large-head, Dual-mobility, and Constrained Liners.
    Hoskins W; Griffin X; Hatton A; de Steiger RN; Bingham R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Jan; 479(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 32876424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fixation, sex, and age: highest risk of revision for uncemented stems in elderly women - data from 66,995 primary total hip arthroplasties in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
    Dale H; Børsheim S; Kristensen TB; Fenstad AM; Gjertsen JE; Hallan G; Lie SA; Furnes O
    Acta Orthop; 2020 Feb; 91(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 31663413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. No Increase in Survival for 36-mm versus 32-mm Femoral Heads in Metal-on-polyethylene THA: A Registry Study.
    Tsikandylakis G; Kärrholm J; Hailer NP; Eskelinen A; Mäkelä KT; Hallan G; Furnes ON; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Mohaddes M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Dec; 476(12):2367-2378. PubMed ID: 30260863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Uncemented or cemented revision stems? Analysis of 2,296 first-time hip revision arthroplasties performed due to aseptic loosening, reported to the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
    Tyson Y; Rolfson O; Kärrholm J; Hailer NP; Mohaddes M
    Acta Orthop; 2019 Oct; 90(5):421-426. PubMed ID: 31154890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of femoral head size and surgical approach on risk of revision for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty.
    Zijlstra WP; De Hartog B; Van Steenbergen LN; Scheurs BW; Nelissen RGHH
    Acta Orthop; 2017 Aug; 88(4):395-401. PubMed ID: 28440704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implant Survival After Minimally Invasive Anterior or Anterolateral Vs. Conventional Posterior or Direct Lateral Approach: An Analysis of 21,860 Total Hip Arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register (2008 to 2013).
    Mjaaland KE; Svenningsen S; Fenstad AM; Havelin LI; Furnes O; Nordsletten L
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 May; 99(10):840-847. PubMed ID: 28509824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Comparison of Revision Rates for Dislocation and Aseptic Causes Between Dual Mobility and Large Femoral Head Bearings in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With Subanalysis by Acetabular Component Size: An Analysis of 106,163 Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties.
    Hoskins W; Bingham R; Dyer C; Rainbird S; Graves SE
    J Arthroplasty; 2021 Sep; 36(9):3233-3240. PubMed ID: 34088570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revision hip arthroplasty dislocation risk calculator: when to select dual mobility, large heads, constrained liners, or a standard head size? Testing one hundred thousand hip revisions with artificial intelligence.
    Hernigou P; Tannyeres P; Barbier O; Chenaie P
    Int Orthop; 2023 Aug; 47(8):2003-2011. PubMed ID: 37326696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Following total hip arthroplasty: femoral head component diameter of 32 mm or larger is associated with lower risk of dislocation in patients with a prior lumbar fusion.
    Mononen H; Sund R; Halme J; Kröger H; Sirola J
    Bone Joint J; 2020 Aug; 102-B(8):1003-1009. PubMed ID: 32731818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changing Surgical Approach From Primary to Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Is Not Associated With Increased Risk of Dislocation or Re-Revisions.
    Harmer JR; Wyles CC; Larson DR; Taunton MJ; Pagnano MW; Abdel MP
    J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jul; 37(7S):S622-S627. PubMed ID: 35276276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Uncemented and cemented primary total hip arthroplasty in the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
    Hailer NP; Garellick G; Kärrholm J
    Acta Orthop; 2010 Feb; 81(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 20180715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are Hooded, Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners Associated with a Reduced Risk of Revision After THA?
    Bauze A; Agrawal S; Cuthbert A; de Steiger R
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jun; 477(6):1315-1321. PubMed ID: 31136427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Total, hemi, or dual-mobility arthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in patients with neurological disease : analysis of 9,638 patients from the Swedish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
    Cnudde PHJ; Nåtman J; Hailer NP; Rogmark C
    Bone Joint J; 2022 Jan; 104-B(1):134-141. PubMed ID: 34969279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Posterior approach, fracture diagnosis, and american society of anesthesiology class iii-iv are associated with increased risk of revision for dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: An analysis of 33,337 operations from the finnish arthroplasty register.
    Panula VJ; Ekman EM; Venäläinen MS; Laaksonen I; Klén R; Haapakoski JJ; Eskelinen AP; Elo LL; Mäkelä KT
    Scand J Surg; 2021 Sep; 110(3):351-358. PubMed ID: 32500836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Risk factors for dislocation after revision total hip arthroplasty with a dual-mobility cup. Matched case-control study (16 cases vs. 48 controls).
    Huten D; Fournier Y; Gicquel T; Bertho P; Basselot F; Hamadouche M
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Nov; 105(7):1303-1309. PubMed ID: 31153859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcome of revision hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 55 years: an analysis of 1,037 revisions in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.
    Kuijpers MFL; Hannink G; van Steenbergen LN; Schreurs BW
    Acta Orthop; 2020 Apr; 91(2):165-170. PubMed ID: 31928096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.