BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35771520)

  • 21. The role of the working alliance in treatment for alcohol problems.
    Cook S; Heather N; McCambridge J;
    Psychol Addict Behav; 2015 Jun; 29(2):371-81. PubMed ID: 25961147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Working alliance, real relationship, session quality, and client improvement in psychodynamic psychotherapy: A longitudinal actor partner interdependence model.
    Kivlighan DM; Hill CE; Gelso CJ; Baumann E
    J Couns Psychol; 2016 Mar; 63(2):149-61. PubMed ID: 26689627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Retraction of Hillman et al. (2022).
    J Couns Psychol; 2023 Jul; 70(4):435. PubMed ID: 37428765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The triadic effect: Associations among the supervisory working alliance, therapeutic working alliance, and therapy session evaluation.
    Gerstenblith JA; Kline KV; Hill CE; Kivlighan DM
    J Couns Psychol; 2022 Mar; 69(2):199-210. PubMed ID: 34570538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Clients' pretreatment counseling expectations as predictors of the working alliance.
    Patterson CL; Uhlin B; Anderson T
    J Couns Psychol; 2008 Oct; 55(4):528-34. PubMed ID: 22017559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Follow you or follow me? Examining therapist responsiveness to client and responsiveness to self, using differential equations model and multilevel data disaggregation from an interpersonal theory framework.
    Li X; Kivlighan DM; Hill CE
    J Couns Psychol; 2020 Oct; 67(5):608-621. PubMed ID: 31855025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Retraction of O'Connor et al. (2019).
    J Couns Psychol; 2023 Jul; 70(4):449. PubMed ID: 37428770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Relationships among client and counselor agreement about the working alliance, session evaluations, and change in client symptoms using response surface analysis.
    Marmarosh CL; Kivlighan DM
    J Couns Psychol; 2012 Jul; 59(3):352-67. PubMed ID: 22774865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The relationship between clients' expectation of therapist support and challenge and treatment outcome: A response surface analysis.
    Wang K; Chung H; Stuart-Maver SL; Schreier B; Galligan P; Davis H; Kivlighan DM
    Psychotherapy (Chic); 2022 Sep; 59(3):481-486. PubMed ID: 35604718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The relationship between responsibility attribution and session outcomes: Two-dimension attribution and two-person perspective.
    Lai L; Sun Q; Zhu W; Ren Z
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2022 Nov; 29(6):1928-1941. PubMed ID: 35722918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Congruence and discrepancy between working alliance and real relationship: Variance decomposition and response surface analyses.
    Kivlighan DM; Kline K; Gelso CJ; Hill CE
    J Couns Psychol; 2017 Jul; 64(4):394-409. PubMed ID: 28383942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Client and Therapist Attachment Styles and Working Alliance.
    Bucci S; Seymour-Hyde A; Harris A; Berry K
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2016; 23(2):155-65. PubMed ID: 25639686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Therapist emotion and emotional change with clients: Effects on perceived empathy and session quality.
    Chui H; Li X; Luk S
    Psychotherapy (Chic); 2022 Dec; 59(4):594-605. PubMed ID: 35771517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Client and therapist therapeutic alliance, session evaluation, and client reliable change: a moderated actor-partner interdependence model.
    Kivlighan DM; Marmarosh CL; Hilsenroth MJ
    J Couns Psychol; 2014 Jan; 61(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 24188649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Examining between- and within-person effects of the self-stigma of seeking psychological help on the therapeutic working alliance: The moderating role of psychological distress.
    Seidman AJ; Vogel DL; Lannin DG
    Psychotherapy (Chic); 2023 Jun; 60(2):206-211. PubMed ID: 36951720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Moderators of congruent alliance between therapists and clients: A realistic accuracy model.
    Chen R; Rafaeli E; Bar-Kalifa E; Gilboa-Schechtman E; Lutz W; Atzil-Slonim D
    J Couns Psychol; 2018 Nov; 65(6):703-714. PubMed ID: 30024193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Examining therapy dynamics and session outcome using differential equations model and multilevel data disaggregation.
    Li X; Kivlighan DM
    Psychother Res; 2020 Jun; 30(5):604-621. PubMed ID: 31382841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The within-client alliance-outcome relationship: A response surface analysis.
    Hillman JW; Lu Y; Kivlighan DM; Hill CE
    J Couns Psychol; 2022 Nov; 69(6):812-822. PubMed ID: 35980707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Clients' and therapists' views of the therapeutic alliance: similarities, differences and relationship to therapy outcome.
    Bachelor A
    Clin Psychol Psychother; 2013; 20(2):118-35. PubMed ID: 22081490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Are you in the mood? Therapist affect and psychotherapy process.
    Chui H; Hill CE; Kline K; Kuo P; Mohr JJ
    J Couns Psychol; 2016 Jul; 63(4):405-418. PubMed ID: 27177026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.