175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35771877)
1. Forecasting elections with agent-based modeling: Two live experiments.
Gao M; Wang Z; Wang K; Liu C; Tang S
PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0270194. PubMed ID: 35771877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Health care in the 2004 presidential election.
Blendon RJ; Altman DE; Benson JM; Brodie M
N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1314-22. PubMed ID: 15385658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An Assessment of the Results of European Parliament Elections in Greece and European Union Under the Shadow of Economic Crisis.
Fanourgiakis J; Kanoupakis E
Int J Health Serv; 2016 Oct; 46(4):642-55. PubMed ID: 27491404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Demographic change and the 2016 presidential election.
Maggio C
Soc Sci Res; 2021 Mar; 95():102459. PubMed ID: 33653583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Social media popularity and election results: A study of the 2016 Taiwanese general election.
Zhang X
PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0208190. PubMed ID: 30485347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving Predictive Accuracy in Elections.
Sathiaraj D; Cassidy WM; Rohli E
Big Data; 2017 Dec; 5(4):325-336. PubMed ID: 29235914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Election polling errors across time and space.
Jennings W; Wlezien C
Nat Hum Behav; 2018 Apr; 2(4):276-283. PubMed ID: 30936537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Competence Judgments Based on Facial Appearance Are Better Predictors of American Elections Than of Korean Elections.
Na J; Kim S; Oh H; Choi I; O'Toole A
Psychol Sci; 2015 Jul; 26(7):1107-13. PubMed ID: 25956912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Public interest in Cannabis during election season: a Google Trends analysis.
Torgerson T; Roberts W; Lester D; Khojasteh J; Vassar M
J Cannabis Res; 2020 Sep; 2(1):31. PubMed ID: 33526135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Voters and health care in the 2004 election.
Blendon RJ; Brodie M; Altman DE; Benson JM; Hamel EC
Health Aff (Millwood); 2005; Suppl Web Exclusives():W5-86-W5-96. PubMed ID: 15741610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using Facebook data to predict the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
Chang KC; Chiang CF; Lin MJ
PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0253560. PubMed ID: 34851951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Voters and the Affordable Care Act in the 2014 election.
Blendon RJ; Benson JM
N Engl J Med; 2014 Nov; 371(20):e31. PubMed ID: 25353968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Older voters and the 2010 U.S. election: implications for 2012 and beyond?
Binstock RH
Gerontologist; 2012 Jun; 52(3):408-17. PubMed ID: 22048809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Improving election prediction internationally.
Kennedy R; Wojcik S; Lazer D
Science; 2017 Feb; 355(6324):515-520. PubMed ID: 28154078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adoption of Strategies to Mitigate Transmission of COVID-19 During a Statewide Primary Election - Delaware, September 2020.
Leidman E; Hall NB; Kirby AE; Garcia-Williams AG; Aponte J; Yoder JS; Hong R; Albence A; Coronado F; Massetti GM
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2020 Oct; 69(43):1571-1575. PubMed ID: 33119560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy gains from conservative forecasting: Tests using variations of 19 econometric models to predict 154 elections in 10 countries.
Graefe A; Green KC; Armstrong JS
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209850. PubMed ID: 30629630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Swaying the Public? Impacts of Election Forecast Visualizations on Emotion, Trust, and Intention in the 2022 U.S. Midterms.
Yang F; Cai M; Mortenson C; Fakhari H; Lokmanoglu AD; Hullman J; Franconeri S; Diakopoulos N; Nisbet EC; Kay M
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2024 Jan; 30(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 37930916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Forensic analysis of the Turkey 2023 presidential election reveals extreme vote swings in remote areas.
Klimek P; Aykaç A; Thurner S
PLoS One; 2023; 18(11):e0293239. PubMed ID: 37967045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Age differences in affective forecasting and experienced emotion surrounding the 2008 US presidential election.
Scheibe S; Mata R; Carstensen LL
Cogn Emot; 2011 Sep; 25(6):1029-44. PubMed ID: 21547760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
