These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3577198)

  • 1. Postponement of health care by unmarried older women.
    Keith PM
    Women Health; 1987; 12(1):47-60. PubMed ID: 3577198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An econometric analysis of the fertility and labor supply of unmarried women.
    Lehrer E; Nerlove M
    Res Popul Econ; 1982; 4():217-35. PubMed ID: 12264902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.
    Schor EL;
    Pediatrics; 2003 Jun; 111(6 Pt 2):1541-71. PubMed ID: 12777595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Delayed marriages in Pakistan.
    Sathar ZA; Kiani MF
    Pak Dev Rev; 1986; 25(4):535-50. PubMed ID: 12341741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The exclusion of never-married women from Chinese fertility surveys.
    Li RM; Newcomer SF
    Stud Fam Plann; 1996; 27(3):148-54. PubMed ID: 8829297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marital status and its relation to the use of short-stay hospitals and nursing homes.
    Lewis WF
    Public Health Rep; 1984; 99(4):415-24. PubMed ID: 6431491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The intersection of sex, marital status, and cardiovascular risk factors in shaping stroke incidence: results from the health and retirement study.
    Maselko J; Bates LM; Avendaño M; Glymour MM
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2009 Dec; 57(12):2293-9. PubMed ID: 19874408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using data for couples to project the distributional effects of changes in Social Security policy.
    Butrica BA; Iams HM; Sandell SH
    Soc Secur Bull; 1999; 62(3):20-7. PubMed ID: 10732368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of marital status on outcomes in hospitalized patients. Evidence from an academic medical center.
    Gordon HS; Rosenthal GE
    Arch Intern Med; 1995 Dec 11-25; 155(22):2465-71. PubMed ID: 7503606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contraceptive use, pregnancy and fertility patterns among single American women in their 20s.
    Tanfer K; Horn MC
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1985; 17(1):10-9. PubMed ID: 3979524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How relevant is marital status and gender variables in coping with colorectal cancer? A sample of middle-aged and older cancer survivors.
    Goldzweig G; Andritsch E; Hubert A; Walach N; Perry S; Brenner B; Baider L
    Psychooncology; 2009 Aug; 18(8):866-74. PubMed ID: 19061195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. American household structure in transition.
    Glick PC
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1984; 16(5):205-11. PubMed ID: 6500019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Nonmarital childbearing in the 1980s: assessing the importance of women 25 and older.
    Foster EM; Hoffman SD
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(3):117-9. PubMed ID: 8827148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Low-income widows and other aged singles.
    Tissue T
    Soc Secur Bull; 1979 Dec; 42(12):3-10. PubMed ID: 545715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marital status and living arrangements: March 1985.
    Saluter AF
    Curr Popul Rep Popul Charact; 1986 Nov; (410):i-1-88. PubMed ID: 12158791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Divorced women at retirement: projections of economic well-being in the near future.
    Butrica BA; Iams HM
    Soc Secur Bull; 2000; 63(3):3-12. PubMed ID: 11439704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Marital status, gender, and perception of well-being.
    Mookherjee HN
    J Soc Psychol; 1997 Feb; 137(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 9121145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marital status and health: United States, 1999-2002.
    Schoenborn CA
    Adv Data; 2004 Dec; (351):1-32. PubMed ID: 15633583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A future at risk: children having children.
    Dorrell LD
    Clearing House; 1994; 67(4):224-7. PubMed ID: 12288404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The need for prenatal care in the United States: evidence from the 1980 National Natality Survey.
    Singh S; Torres A; Forrest JD
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1985; 17(3):118-24. PubMed ID: 3842661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.