These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35772565)

  • 1. Bioenergy from anaerobic digestion plants: Energy and environmental assessment of a wide sample of Italian plants.
    Mistretta M; Gulotta TM; Caputo P; Cellura M
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Oct; 843():157012. PubMed ID: 35772565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anaerobic digestion of different feedstocks: impact on energetic and environmental balances of biogas process.
    Bacenetti J; Negri M; Fiala M; González-García S
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Oct; 463-464():541-51. PubMed ID: 23831800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consequential environmental life cycle assessment of a farm-scale biogas plant.
    Van Stappen F; Mathot M; Decruyenaere V; Loriers A; Delcour A; Planchon V; Goffart JP; Stilmant D
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Jun; 175():20-32. PubMed ID: 27017269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Environmental assessment of energy generation from agricultural and farm waste through anaerobic digestion.
    Nayal FS; Mammadov A; Ciliz N
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 184(Pt 2):389-399. PubMed ID: 27742149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Life Cycle Environmental Impacts of Electricity from Biogas Produced by Anaerobic Digestion.
    Fusi A; Bacenetti J; Fiala M; Azapagic A
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2016; 4():26. PubMed ID: 27014689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biogas production by means of an anaerobic-digestion plant in France: LCA of greenhouse-gas emissions and other environmental indicators.
    Lamnatou C; Nicolaï R; Chemisana D; Cristofari C; Cancellieri D
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jun; 670():1226-1239. PubMed ID: 31018437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of the influence of energy density and feedstock transport distance on the environmental performance of methane from maize silages.
    Bacenetti J; Lovarelli D; Ingrao C; Tricase C; Negri M; Fiala M
    Bioresour Technol; 2015 Oct; 193():256-65. PubMed ID: 26141286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing the environmental sustainability of energy recovery from municipal solid waste in the UK.
    Jeswani HK; Azapagic A
    Waste Manag; 2016 Apr; 50():346-63. PubMed ID: 26906085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Environmental sustainability of anaerobic digestion of household food waste.
    Slorach PC; Jeswani HK; Cuéllar-Franca R; Azapagic A
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Apr; 236():798-814. PubMed ID: 30776553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Environmental impact of rejected materials generated in organic fraction of municipal solid waste anaerobic digestion plants: Comparison of wet and dry process layout.
    Colazo AB; Sánchez A; Font X; Colón J
    Waste Manag; 2015 Sep; 43():84-97. PubMed ID: 26123979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the environmental sustainability of electricity generation in Chile.
    Gaete-Morales C; Gallego-Schmid A; Stamford L; Azapagic A
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Sep; 636():1155-1170. PubMed ID: 29913578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Life-cycle assessment of a biogas power plant with application of different climate metrics and inclusion of near-term climate forcers.
    Iordan C; Lausselet C; Cherubini F
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 184(Pt 3):517-527. PubMed ID: 27789091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Environmental assessment of energy production from anaerobic digestion of pig manure at medium-scale using life cycle assessment.
    Ramírez-Islas ME; Güereca LP; Sosa-Rodriguez FS; Cobos-Peralta MA
    Waste Manag; 2020 Feb; 102():85-96. PubMed ID: 31669678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Environmental sustainability of integrating the organic Rankin cycle with anaerobic digestion and combined heat and power generation.
    Bacenetti J; Fusi A; Azapagic A
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Mar; 658():684-696. PubMed ID: 30678020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Eco-efficiency assessment of farm-scaled biogas plants.
    Lijó L; Lorenzo-Toja Y; González-García S; Bacenetti J; Negri M; Moreira MT
    Bioresour Technol; 2017 Aug; 237():146-155. PubMed ID: 28189330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Production costs and operative margins in electric energy generation from biogas. Full-scale case studies in Italy.
    Riva C; Schievano A; D'Imporzano G; Adani F
    Waste Manag; 2014 Aug; 34(8):1429-35. PubMed ID: 24841069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Life cycle environmental impacts of biogas production and utilisation substituting for grid electricity, natural gas grid and transport fuels.
    Natividad Pérez-Camacho M; Curry R; Cromie T
    Waste Manag; 2019 Jul; 95():90-101. PubMed ID: 31351658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Energy from forest residues in Turkey: An environmental and economic life cycle assessment of different technologies.
    Balcioglu G; Jeswani HK; Azapagic A
    Sci Total Environ; 2023 May; 874():162316. PubMed ID: 36813199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Life cycle assessment of flexibly fed biogas processes for an improved demand-oriented biogas supply.
    Ertem FC; Martínez-Blanco J; Finkbeiner M; Neubauer P; Junne S
    Bioresour Technol; 2016 Nov; 219():536-544. PubMed ID: 27522120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessing anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure with agroindustrial wastes: the link between environmental impacts and operational parameters.
    Rodriguez-Verde I; Regueiro L; Carballa M; Hospido A; Lema JM
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Nov; 497-498():475-483. PubMed ID: 25150742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.