These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35772876)

  • 1. Accuracy of 3-dimensional printed bracket transfer tray using an in-office indirect bonding system.
    Yoo SH; Choi SH; Kim KM; Lee KJ; Kim YJ; Yu JH; Choi YI; Cha JY
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2022 Jul; 162(1):93-102.e1. PubMed ID: 35772876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of indirect bonding trays - a measurement algorithm.
    Koch PJ; Albrecht M; Lin WC; Jost-Brinkmann PG
    Int J Comput Dent; 2022 Sep; 25(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 35072417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of bracket position using thermoplastic and 3D-printed indirect bonding trays.
    Shin SH; Lee KJ; Kim SJ; Yu HS; Kim KM; Hwang CJ; Cha JY
    Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Jun; 24(2):133-145. PubMed ID: 34085499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bracket transfer accuracy with two different three-dimensional printed transfer trays vs silicone transfer trays.
    Hoffmann L; Sabbagh H; Wichelhaus A; Kessler A
    Angle Orthod; 2022 May; 92(3):364-371. PubMed ID: 34982114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the transfer accuracy of two digital indirect bonding trays for labial bracket bonding.
    Niu Y; Zeng Y; Zhang Z; Xu W; Xiao L
    Angle Orthod; 2021 Jan; 91(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 33289807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of Two 3D-Printed Indirect Bonding (IDB) Tray Design Versions and Their Influence on the Transfer Accuracy.
    von Glasenapp J; Hofmann E; Süpple J; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Koch PJ
    J Clin Med; 2022 Feb; 11(5):. PubMed ID: 35268386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Indirect bonding: an in-vitro comparison of a Polyjet printed versus a conventional silicone transfer tray.
    Hofmann EC; Süpple J; von Glasenapp J; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Koch PJ
    Angle Orthod; 2022 Nov; 92(6):728-737. PubMed ID: 35834817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reproducibility of digital indirect bonding technique using three-dimensional (3D) models and 3D-printed transfer trays.
    Duarte MEA; Gribel BF; Spitz A; Artese F; Miguel JAM
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Jan; 90(1):92-99. PubMed ID: 31411488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating the accuracy of one-piece and three-piece 3D-printed indirect bonding transfer trays: An in vitro study.
    Wajda M; Lis J; Kawala B
    Dent Med Probl; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38916075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the accuracy of two techniques for three-dimensional digital indirect bonding of orthodontic brackets: A randomized controlled trial.
    Mahran AA; Refai WM; Hashem AS
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2024; 29(3):e2423117. PubMed ID: 38985074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accurate Bracket Placement with an Indirect Bonding Method Using Digitally Designed Transfer Models Printed in Different Orientations-An In Vitro Study.
    Süpple J; von Glasenapp J; Hofmann E; Jost-Brinkmann PG; Koch PJ
    J Clin Med; 2021 May; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 34066993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transfer accuracy of 3D-printed trays for indirect bonding of orthodontic brackets.
    Bachour PC; Klabunde R; Grünheid T
    Angle Orthod; 2022 May; 92(3):372-379. PubMed ID: 35006236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lingual bracket transfer accuracy of double vacuum-formed indirect bonding tray using 3D-printed model: an in vivo study.
    Anh NV; Duc NM; Tra NT; Ngoc VTN; Son TM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2024 Mar; 165(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 37906244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of the design of 3D-printed indirect bonding trays and experience of the clinician on the accuracy of bracket placement.
    Sabbagh H; Hoffmann L; Wichelhaus A; Kessler A
    J Orofac Orthop; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38411719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of fence tray matching care on excess adhesive and bracket placement accuracy for orthodontic bonding: an in vitro study.
    Hu M; Cao Y; Wu X; Jiang Q; Zhu F
    BMC Oral Health; 2024 May; 24(1):555. PubMed ID: 38735948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of three-dimensional printing guides and double-layer guide plates in accurate bracket placement.
    Zhang Y; Yang C; Li Y; Xia D; Shi T; Li C
    BMC Oral Health; 2020 Apr; 20(1):127. PubMed ID: 32345292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-Dimensional Digital Superimposition of Orthodontic Bracket Position by Using a Computer-Aided Transfer Jig System: An Accuracy Analysis.
    Park JH; Choi JY; Oh SH; Kim SH
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Sep; 21(17):. PubMed ID: 34502801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. 3D printed indirect bonding trays: Transfer accuracy of hard versus soft resin material in a prospective, randomized, single-blinded clinical study.
    Schwärzler A; Nemec M; Lettner S; Rank C; Schedle A; Jonke E
    Dent Mater; 2023 Nov; 39(11):1058-1065. PubMed ID: 37806794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of 3-dimensional-printed customized transfer tray using a flash-free adhesive system in digital indirect bonding: An in vivo study.
    Fiorillo G; Campobasso A; Caldara G; Battista G; Lo Muzio E; Mandelli G; Ambrosi A; Gastaldi G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Oct; 164(4):505-515. PubMed ID: 37074245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Bracket Failure Rate between Two Different Materials Used to Fabricate Transfer Trays for Indirect Orthodontic Bonding.
    Kulkarni NB; Goyal S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Mar; 23(3):307-312. PubMed ID: 35781435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.