These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35773813)

  • 1. Impact of Follow-Up Imaging Recommendation Specificity on Adherence.
    Mabotuwana T; Hall CS; Hombal V; Dalal S; Gunn ML
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2022 Jun; 295():87-90. PubMed ID: 35773813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Determining Follow-Up Imaging Study Using Radiology Reports.
    Dalal S; Hombal V; Weng WH; Mankovich G; Mabotuwana T; Hall CS; Fuller J; Lehnert BE; Gunn ML
    J Digit Imaging; 2020 Feb; 33(1):121-130. PubMed ID: 31452006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determining Adherence to Follow-up Imaging Recommendations.
    Mabotuwana T; Hombal V; Dalal S; Hall CS; Gunn M
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2018 Mar; 15(3 Pt A):422-428. PubMed ID: 29502651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated Tracking of Follow-Up Imaging Recommendations.
    Mabotuwana T; Hall CS; Hombal V; Pai P; Raghavan UN; Regis S; McKee B; Dalal S; Wald C; Gunn ML
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Jun; 212(6):1287-1294. PubMed ID: 30860895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving Quality of Follow-Up Imaging Recommendations in Radiology.
    Mabotuwana T; Hall CS; Tieder J; Gunn ML
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2017; 2017():1196-1204. PubMed ID: 29854188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Extracting Follow-Up Recommendations and Associated Anatomy from Radiology Reports.
    Mabotuwana T; Hall CS; Dalal S; Tieder J; Gunn ML
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 245():1090-1094. PubMed ID: 29295270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Correlation of the Strength of Recommendations for Additional Imaging to Adherence Rate and Diagnostic Yield.
    Harvey HB; Wu CC; Gilman MD; Vartanians V; Halpern EF; Pandharipande PV; Shepard JO; Alkasab TK
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Oct; 12(10):1016-22. PubMed ID: 26092592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development and Assessment of an Information Technology Intervention to Improve the Clarity of Radiologist Follow-up Recommendations.
    Guenette JP; Kapoor N; Lacson R; Lynch E; Abbasi N; Desai SP; Eappen S; Khorasani R
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Mar; 6(3):e236178. PubMed ID: 37000450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Multidisciplinary Approach to Improving Appropriate Follow-Up Imaging of Ovarian Cysts: A Quality Improvement Initiative.
    Kim DC; Bennett GL; Somberg M; Campbell N; Gaing B; Recht MP; Doshi AM
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 May; 13(5):535-41. PubMed ID: 26953645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reducing Delay in Diagnosis: Multistage Recommendation Tracking.
    Wandtke B; Gallagher S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Nov; 209(5):970-975. PubMed ID: 28742377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quality Improvement Report: Adherence to Follow-up Recommendations for Incidental Abdominal Aneurysms.
    Larocque N; Brook OR; Kavandi H; Brook A; Rawson JV
    Radiographics; 2023 Apr; 43(4):e220121. PubMed ID: 36995945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Extraction of recommendation features in radiology with natural language processing: exploratory study.
    Dang PA; Kalra MK; Blake MA; Schultz TJ; Halpern EF; Dreyer KJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Aug; 191(2):313-20. PubMed ID: 18647895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Variation in Follow-up Imaging Recommendations in Radiology Reports: Patient, Modality, and Radiologist Predictors.
    Cochon LR; Kapoor N; Carrodeguas E; Ip IK; Lacson R; Boland G; Khorasani R
    Radiology; 2019 Jun; 291(3):700-707. PubMed ID: 31063082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automatic Fully-Contextualized Recommendation Extraction from Radiology Reports.
    Steinkamp J; Chambers C; Lalevic D; Cook T
    J Digit Imaging; 2021 Apr; 34(2):374-384. PubMed ID: 33569716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A text processing pipeline to extract recommendations from radiology reports.
    Yetisgen-Yildiz M; Gunn ML; Xia F; Payne TH
    J Biomed Inform; 2013 Apr; 46(2):354-62. PubMed ID: 23354284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The fate of radiology report recommendations at a pediatric medical center.
    Lee B; Otero HJ; Whitehead MT
    Pediatr Radiol; 2017 Dec; 47(13):1724-1729. PubMed ID: 28852809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Process improvement for follow-up radiology report recommendations of lung nodules.
    Lim PS; Schneider D; Sternlieb J; Taupin M; Sich N; Dian J; Jameson E; Frambes B; Taylor S
    BMJ Open Qual; 2019; 8(2):e000370. PubMed ID: 31206047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frequency and analysis of non-clinical errors made in radiology reports using the National Integrated Medical Imaging System voice recognition dictation software.
    Motyer RE; Liddy S; Torreggiani WC; Buckley O
    Ir J Med Sci; 2016 Nov; 185(4):921-927. PubMed ID: 27696148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detecting Technical Image Quality in Radiology Reports.
    Mabotuwana T; Bhandarkar VS; Hall CS; Gunn ML
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2018; 2018():780-788. PubMed ID: 30815120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of recently developed computer algorithm for automatic classification of unstructured radiology reports: validation study.
    Dreyer KJ; Kalra MK; Maher MM; Hurier AM; Asfaw BA; Schultz T; Halpern EF; Thrall JH
    Radiology; 2005 Feb; 234(2):323-9. PubMed ID: 15591435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.