These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35773888)

  • 1. Large-Scale EHR Suites and Path-Dependence.
    Ellingsen G; Hertzum M; Christensen B; Wynn R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2022 Jun; 295():372-375. PubMed ID: 35773888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Persuasion Tactics in the Implementation of Large-Scale EHR Suites in Public Healthcare.
    Ellingsen G; Christensen B; Hertzum M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2021 Nov; 286():33-37. PubMed ID: 34755686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Configuring Secretarial Workflows in the Epic EHR Suite.
    Ellingsen G; Hertzum M; Anthun KS; Melby L
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2023 Jun; 304():47-51. PubMed ID: 37347567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. National Integration Components Challenge the Epic Implementation in Central Norway.
    Ellingsen G; Hertzum M; Christensen B; Wynn R
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2022 May; 294():500-504. PubMed ID: 35612130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. User Requirements Meet Large-Scale EHR Suites: Norwegian Preparations for Epic.
    Ellingsen G; Hertzum M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2020 Jun; 270():703-707. PubMed ID: 32570474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implementing Large-Scale Electronic Health Records: Experiences from implementations of Epic in Denmark and Finland.
    Hertzum M; Ellingsen G; Cajander Å
    Int J Med Inform; 2022 Nov; 167():104868. PubMed ID: 36194994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The implementation of an electronic health record: Comparing preparations for Epic in Norway with experiences from the UK and Denmark.
    Hertzum M; Ellingsen G
    Int J Med Inform; 2019 Sep; 129():312-317. PubMed ID: 31445272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A statewide assessment of electronic health record adoption and health information exchange among nursing homes.
    Abramson EL; McGinnis S; Moore J; Kaushal R;
    Health Serv Res; 2014 Feb; 49(1 Pt 2):361-72. PubMed ID: 24359612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Challenges in user-driven optimization of EHR: A case study of a large Epic implementation in Denmark.
    Bansler JP
    Int J Med Inform; 2021 Apr; 148():104394. PubMed ID: 33485217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Usability problems do not heal by themselves: National survey on physicians' experiences with EHRs in Finland.
    Kaipio J; Lääveri T; Hyppönen H; Vainiomäki S; Reponen J; Kushniruk A; Borycki E; Vänskä J
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 Jan; 97():266-281. PubMed ID: 27919385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electronic health record implementation and healthcare workers' work characteristics and autonomous motivation-a before-and-after study.
    Veenstra GL; Rietzschel EF; Molleman E; Heineman E; Pols J; Welker GA
    BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2022 May; 22(1):120. PubMed ID: 35505319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Integrating Option Grid Patient Decision Aids in the Epic Electronic Health Record: Case Study at 5 Health Systems.
    Scalia P; Ahmad F; Schubbe D; Forcino R; Durand MA; Barr PJ; Elwyn G
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 May; 23(5):e22766. PubMed ID: 33938806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Organizational Characteristics and the Adoption of Electronic Health Records Among Nursing Homes in One Southern State.
    Felix H; Dayama N; Morris ME; Pradhan R; Bradway C
    J Appl Gerontol; 2021 May; 40(5):481-488. PubMed ID: 32081058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence-based management of ambulatory electronic health record system implementation: an assessment of conceptual support and qualitative evidence.
    McAlearney AS; Hefner JL; Sieck C; Rizer M; Huerta TR
    Int J Med Inform; 2014 Jul; 83(7):484-94. PubMed ID: 24862893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Calculations of Financial Incentives for Providers in a Pay-for-Performance Program: Manual Review Versus Data From Structured Fields in Electronic Health Records.
    Urech TH; Woodard LD; Virani SS; Dudley RA; Lutschg MZ; Petersen LA
    Med Care; 2015 Oct; 53(10):901-7. PubMed ID: 26340661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Readiness-Based Implementation of Electronic Health Records: A Survey of Jordanian Nurses.
    Alsadi M; Saleh A; Khalil M; Oweidat I
    Creat Nurs; 2022 Feb; 28(1):42-47. PubMed ID: 35173061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electronic Health Records in Danish Home Care and Nursing Homes: Inadequate Documentation of Care, Medication, and Consent.
    Hertzum M
    Appl Clin Inform; 2021 Jan; 12(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 33440430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Eliciting end-user expectations to guide the implementation process of a new electronic health record: A case study using concept mapping.
    Joukes E; Cornet R; de Bruijne MC; de Keizer NF
    Int J Med Inform; 2016 Mar; 87():111-7. PubMed ID: 26806718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An Experience of Electronic Health Records Implementation in a Mexican Region.
    Uc BM; Castillo-Sánchez G; Marques G; Arambarri J; de la Torre-Díez I
    J Med Syst; 2020 Apr; 44(6):106. PubMed ID: 32323000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Opportunities, Pitfalls, and Alternatives in Adapting Electronic Health Records for Health Services Research.
    Taksler GB; Dalton JE; Perzynski AT; Rothberg MB; Milinovich A; Krieger NI; Dawson NV; Roach MJ; Lewis MD; Einstadter D
    Med Decis Making; 2021 Feb; 41(2):133-142. PubMed ID: 32969760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.