406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35774581)
1. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs. Chemotherapy Alone as First-Line Treatment in Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and PD-L1 CPS of 10 or More.
Zheng Z; Lin J; Zhu H; Cai H
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():893387. PubMed ID: 35774581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab vs. chemotherapy as second-line treatment for advanced esophageal carcinoma in the United States.
Hu J; Ye Z; Xu Z; Hao Z; Wang Y
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():941738. PubMed ID: 36568792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness analysis of serplulimab plus chemotherapy in the first-line treatment for PD-L1-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China.
Liu S; Jiang N; Dou L; Li S
Front Immunol; 2023; 14():1172242. PubMed ID: 37215110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Advanced Esophageal Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Zhu Y; Liu K; Ding D; Zhou Y; Peng L
Adv Ther; 2022 Jun; 39(6):2614-2629. PubMed ID: 35394255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Cancer Based on the KEYNOTE-181 Study.
Zhan M; Xu T; Zheng H; He Z
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():790225. PubMed ID: 35309225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus standard-of-care chemotherapy for first-line treatment of PD-L1 positive (>50%) metastatic squamous and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in France.
Chouaid C; Bensimon L; Clay E; Millier A; Levy-Bachelot L; Huang M; Levy P
Lung Cancer; 2019 Jan; 127():44-52. PubMed ID: 30642550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer with PD-L1 tumor proportion score 1% or greater.
She L; Hu H; Liao M; Xia X; Shi Y; Yao L; Ding D; Zhu Y; Zeng S; Shen L; Huang J; Carbone DP
Lung Cancer; 2019 Dec; 138():88-94. PubMed ID: 31655368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Economic evaluation of sintilimab plus chemotherapy vs. pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for the treatment of first-line advanced or metastatic squamous NSCLC.
Chen P; Wang X; Zhu S; Li H; Rui M; Wang Y; Sun H; Ma A
Front Public Health; 2022; 10():956792. PubMed ID: 36016894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment for advanced esophageal cancer.
Ye ZM; Xu Z; Wang HL; Wang YY; Chen ZC; Zhou Q; Li XP; Zhang YY
Cancer Med; 2023 Mar; 12(5):6182-6189. PubMed ID: 36271484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy with PD-L1 test for the first-line treatment of NSCLC.
Wan N; Zhang TT; Hua SH; Lu ZL; Ji B; Li LX; Lu LQ; Huang WJ; Jiang J; Li J
Cancer Med; 2020 Mar; 9(5):1683-1693. PubMed ID: 31945265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy versus cetuximab plus chemotherapy to treat recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: An updated KEYNOTE-048 based cost-effectiveness analysis.
She L; Tian K; Han J; Zuo W; Wang Z; Zhang N
Oral Oncol; 2022 Jun; 129():105871. PubMed ID: 35483156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy in the 1st line treatment of non-squamous NSCLC in the US.
Insinga RP; Vanness DJ; Feliciano JL; Vandormael K; Traore S; Burke T
J Med Econ; 2018 Dec; 21(12):1191-1205. PubMed ID: 30188231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-Utility Analysis of Pembrolizumab Versus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Different PD-L1 Expression Levels.
Weng X; Luo S; Lin S; Zhong L; Li M; Xin R; Huang P; Xu X
Oncol Res; 2020 Mar; 28(2):117-125. PubMed ID: 31610828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab monotherapy versus chemotherapy for previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Aziz MIA; Tan LE; Tan WHG; Toh CK; Loke LPY; Pearce F; Ng K
J Med Econ; 2020 Sep; 23(9):952-960. PubMed ID: 32462958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with metastatic, non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer and high PD-L1 expression in Switzerland.
Barbier MC; Pardo E; Panje CM; Gautschi O; Lupatsch JE;
Eur J Health Econ; 2021 Jul; 22(5):669-677. PubMed ID: 33745093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab for patients with advanced esophageal cancer at PD-L1 combined positive score ≥10.
Xie Q; Luo Y; Peng X
J Comp Eff Res; 2022 Oct; 11(15):1095-1103. PubMed ID: 36043412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of first-line immunotherapies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Yang SC; Ou HT; Su WC; Wang SY
Cancer Med; 2023 Apr; 12(7):8838-8850. PubMed ID: 36653947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal cancer (KEYNOTE-590): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study.
Sun JM; Shen L; Shah MA; Enzinger P; Adenis A; Doi T; Kojima T; Metges JP; Li Z; Kim SB; Cho BC; Mansoor W; Li SH; Sunpaweravong P; Maqueda MA; Goekkurt E; Hara H; Antunes L; Fountzilas C; Tsuji A; Oliden VC; Liu Q; Shah S; Bhagia P; Kato K;
Lancet; 2021 Aug; 398(10302):759-771. PubMed ID: 34454674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-effectiveness analysis of first-line pembrolizumab treatment for PD-L1 positive, non-small cell lung cancer in China.
Liao W; Huang J; Hutton D; Li Q
J Med Econ; 2019 Apr; 22(4):344-349. PubMed ID: 30646794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma enrolled in the randomized KEYNOTE-181 trial in Asia.
Cao Y; Qin S; Luo S; Li Z; Cheng Y; Fan Y; Sun Y; Yin X; Yuan X; Li W; Liu T; Hsu CH; Lin X; Kim SB; Kojima T; Zhang J; Lee SH; Bai Y; Muro K; Doi T; Bai C; Gu K; Pan HM; Bai L; Yang JW; Cui Y; Lu W; Chen J
ESMO Open; 2022 Feb; 7(1):100341. PubMed ID: 34973513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
