BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35775339)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness analysis of short biparametric magnetic resonance imaging protocol in men at risk of prostate cancer.
    Faccioli N; Santi E; Foti G; Curti P; D'Onofrio M
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2022 Jun; 94(2):160-165. PubMed ID: 35775339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High Diagnostic Performance of Short Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocols for Prostate Cancer Detection in Biopsy-naïve Men: The Next Step in Magnetic Resonance Imaging Accessibility.
    van der Leest M; Israël B; Cornel EB; Zámecnik P; Schoots IG; van der Lelij H; Padhani AR; Rovers M; van Oort I; Sedelaar M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Hannink G; Veltman J; Barentsz J
    Eur Urol; 2019 Nov; 76(5):574-581. PubMed ID: 31167748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-Effectiveness of Annual Prostate MRI and Potential MRI-Guided Biopsy After Prostate-Specific Antigen Test Results.
    Yun H; Kim J; Gandhe A; Nelson B; Hu JC; Gulani V; Margolis D; Schackman BR; Jalali A
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Nov; 6(11):e2344856. PubMed ID: 38019516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and MRI-guided biopsy in a population-based prostate cancer screening setting using a micro-simulation model.
    Getaneh AM; Heijnsdijk EA; de Koning HJ
    Cancer Med; 2021 Jun; 10(12):4046-4053. PubMed ID: 33991077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biparametric 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging for prostatic cancer detection in a biopsy-naïve patient population: a further improvement of PI-RADS v2?
    Stanzione A; Imbriaco M; Cocozza S; Fusco F; Rusconi G; Nappi C; Mirone V; Mangiapia F; Brunetti A; Ragozzino A; Longo N
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Dec; 85(12):2269-2274. PubMed ID: 27842676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy-naive Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Based on Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen Values: Results from a Randomized Prospective Blinded Controlled Trial.
    Tonttila PP; Lantto J; Pääkkö E; Piippo U; Kauppila S; Lammentausta E; Ohtonen P; Vaarala MH
    Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 26033153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging and targeted fusion biopsy for early detection of prostate cancer.
    Barnett CL; Davenport MS; Montgomery JS; Wei JT; Montie JE; Denton BT
    BJU Int; 2018 Jul; 122(1):50-58. PubMed ID: 29388388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic Accuracy of Single-plane Biparametric and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial in Biopsy-naïve Men.
    Russo F; Mazzetti S; Regge D; Ambrosini I; Giannini V; Manfredi M; De Luca S; Bollito E; Porpiglia F
    Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Dec; 4(6):855-862. PubMed ID: 33893066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bi- or multiparametric MRI in a sequential screening program for prostate cancer with PSA followed by MRI? Results from the Göteborg prostate cancer screening 2 trial.
    Wallström J; Geterud K; Kohestani K; Maier SE; Månsson M; Pihl CG; Socratous A; Arnsrud Godtman R; Hellström M; Hugosson J
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Nov; 31(11):8692-8702. PubMed ID: 33890152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Multiparametric and Biparametric MRI in First Round Cognitive Targeted Prostate Biopsy in Patients with PSA Levels under 10 ng/mL.
    Lee DH; Nam JK; Lee SS; Han JY; Lee JW; Chung MK; Park SW
    Yonsei Med J; 2017 Sep; 58(5):994-999. PubMed ID: 28792144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Economic Evaluation of Urine-Based or Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reflex Tests in Men With Intermediate Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels in the United States.
    Jiao B; Gulati R; Hendrix N; Gore JL; Rais-Bahrami S; Morgan TM; Etzioni R
    Value Health; 2021 Aug; 24(8):1111-1117. PubMed ID: 34372976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of biparametric MRI to full multiparametric MRI for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Sherrer RL; Glaser ZA; Gordetsky JB; Nix JW; Porter KK; Rais-Bahrami S
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2019 May; 22(2):331-336. PubMed ID: 30413806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and MR-guided targeted biopsy versus systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in diagnosing prostate cancer: a modelling study from a health care perspective.
    de Rooij M; Crienen S; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO; Rovers MM; Grutters JP
    Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):430-6. PubMed ID: 24377803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Financial implications of biparametric prostate MRI.
    Porter KK; King A; Galgano SJ; Sherrer RL; Gordetsky JB; Rais-Bahrami S
    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2020 Mar; 23(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 31239513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Abbreviated Biparametric Prostate MR Imaging in Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen.
    Kuhl CK; Bruhn R; Krämer N; Nebelung S; Heidenreich A; Schrading S
    Radiology; 2017 Nov; 285(2):493-505. PubMed ID: 28727544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance spectroscopy and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques in aiding the localisation of prostate abnormalities for biopsy: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Mowatt G; Scotland G; Boachie C; Cruickshank M; Ford JA; Fraser C; Kurban L; Lam TB; Padhani AR; Royle J; Scheenen TW; Tassie E
    Health Technol Assess; 2013 May; 17(20):vii-xix, 1-281. PubMed ID: 23697373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    Barnett CL; Davenport MS; Montgomery JS; Kunju LP; Denton BT; Piert M
    J Nucl Med; 2019 Dec; 60(12):1705-1712. PubMed ID: 31350321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of biparametric prebiopsy prostate magnetic resonance imaging on the diagnostics of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy naïve men.
    Knaapila J; Autio V; Jambor I; Ettala O; Verho J; Kiviniemi A; Taimen P; Perez IM; Aronen HJ; Syvänen KT; Boström PJ
    Scand J Urol; 2020 Feb; 54(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 31914846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Value of Serial Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-guided Biopsies in Men with Low-risk Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance After 1 Yr Follow-up.
    Hamoen EHJ; Hoeks CMA; Somford DM; van Oort IM; Vergunst H; Oddens JR; Smits GA; Bokhorst LP; Witjes JA; Rovers MM; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Barentsz JO
    Eur Urol Focus; 2019 May; 5(3):407-415. PubMed ID: 29331622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic value of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an adjunct to prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based detection of prostate cancer in men without prior biopsies.
    Rais-Bahrami S; Siddiqui MM; Vourganti S; Turkbey B; Rastinehad AR; Stamatakis L; Truong H; Walton-Diaz A; Hoang AN; Nix JW; Merino MJ; Wood BJ; Simon RM; Choyke PL; Pinto PA
    BJU Int; 2015 Mar; 115(3):381-8. PubMed ID: 24447678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.