118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35775339)
21. Prebiopsy Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Combined with Prostate-specific Antigen Density in Detecting and Ruling out Gleason 7-10 Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-naïve Men.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
Eur Urol Oncol; 2019 May; 2(3):311-319. PubMed ID: 31200846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Decision analysis model comparing cost of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging vs. repeat biopsy for detection of prostate cancer in men with prior negative findings on biopsy.
Lotan Y; Haddad AQ; Costa DN; Pedrosa I; Rofsky NM; Roehrborn CG
Urol Oncol; 2015 Jun; 33(6):266.e9-16. PubMed ID: 25858102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cost-effectiveness analysis of multiparametric MRI with increased active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer in Australia.
Gordon LG; James R; Tuffaha HW; Lowe A; Yaxley J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 May; 45(5):1304-1315. PubMed ID: 27726240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Monitoring radiotherapy induced tissue changes in localized prostate cancer by multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI).
Wu X; Reinikainen P; Kapanen M; Vierikko T; Ryymin P; Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2019 Nov; 100(11):699-708. PubMed ID: 31257114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Active Surveillance Strategies for Men with Low-risk Prostate Cancer.
Sathianathen NJ; Konety BR; Alarid-Escudero F; Lawrentschuk N; Bolton DM; Kuntz KM
Eur Urol; 2019 Jun; 75(6):910-917. PubMed ID: 30425010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Biparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer in Biopsy-Naive Men: The Biparametric MRI for Detection of Prostate Cancer (BIDOC) Study.
Boesen L; Nørgaard N; Løgager V; Balslev I; Bisbjerg R; Thestrup KC; Winther MD; Jakobsen H; Thomsen HS
JAMA Netw Open; 2018 Jun; 1(2):e180219. PubMed ID: 30646066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Diagnostic Performance of
Margel D; Bernstine H; Groshar D; Ber Y; Nezrit O; Segal N; Yakimov M; Baniel J; Domachevsky L
Radiology; 2021 Nov; 301(2):379-386. PubMed ID: 34463555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The Key Combined Value of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted and Concomitant Systematic Biopsies for the Prediction of Adverse Pathological Features in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.
Gandaglia G; Ploussard G; Valerio M; Mattei A; Fiori C; Roumiguié M; Fossati N; Stabile A; Beauval JB; Malavaud B; Scuderi S; Barletta F; Moschini M; Zamboni S; Rakauskas A; Tian Z; Karakiewicz PI; De Cobelli F; Porpiglia F; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol; 2020 Jun; 77(6):733-741. PubMed ID: 31547938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Evaluation of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detection and Prediction of Prostate Cancer.
Wang R; Wang H; Zhao C; Hu J; Jiang Y; Tong Y; Liu T; Huang R; Wang X
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0130207. PubMed ID: 26067423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Multiparametric MRI-Based Radiomics for Prostate Cancer Screening With PSA in 4-10 ng/mL to Reduce Unnecessary Biopsies.
Qi Y; Zhang S; Wei J; Zhang G; Lei J; Yan W; Xiao Y; Yan S; Xue H; Feng F; Sun H; Tian J; Jin Z
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Jun; 51(6):1890-1899. PubMed ID: 31808980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Diagnostic accuracy of biparametric versus multiparametric prostate MRI: assessment of contrast benefit in clinical practice.
Zawaideh JP; Sala E; Shaida N; Koo B; Warren AY; Carmisciano L; Saeb-Parsy K; Gnanapragasam VJ; Kastner C; Barrett T
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):4039-4049. PubMed ID: 32166495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.
van der Leest M; Cornel E; Israël B; Hendriks R; Padhani AR; Hoogenboom M; Zamecnik P; Bakker D; Setiasti AY; Veltman J; van den Hout H; van der Lelij H; van Oort I; Klaver S; Debruyne F; Sedelaar M; Hannink G; Rovers M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):570-578. PubMed ID: 30477981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging can exclude prostate cancer progression in patients on active surveillance: a retrospective cohort study.
Ullrich T; Arsov C; Quentin M; Mones F; Westphalen AC; Mally D; Hiester A; Albers P; Antoch G; Schimmöller L
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6042-6051. PubMed ID: 32591887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Prostate cancer screening using a combination of risk-prediction, MRI, and targeted prostate biopsies (STHLM3-MRI): a prospective, population-based, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.
Nordström T; Discacciati A; Bergman M; Clements M; Aly M; Annerstedt M; Glaessgen A; Carlsson S; Jäderling F; Eklund M; Grönberg H;
Lancet Oncol; 2021 Sep; 22(9):1240-1249. PubMed ID: 34391509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Modelling Study with an Interactive Model Assessing the Cost-effectiveness of
Scholte M; Barentsz JO; Sedelaar JPM; Gotthardt M; Grutters JPC; Rovers MM
Eur Urol Focus; 2020 Sep; 6(5):967-974. PubMed ID: 30826284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Benefit, Harm, and Cost-effectiveness Associated With Magnetic Resonance Imaging Before Biopsy in Age-based and Risk-stratified Screening for Prostate Cancer.
Callender T; Emberton M; Morris S; Pharoah PDP; Pashayan N
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Mar; 4(3):e2037657. PubMed ID: 33704474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer.
Thestrup KC; Logager V; Baslev I; Møller JM; Hansen RH; Thomsen HS
Acta Radiol Open; 2016 Aug; 5(8):2058460116663046. PubMed ID: 27583170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Three-Tesla magnetic resonance-guided prostate biopsy in men with increased prostate-specific antigen and repeated, negative, random, systematic, transrectal ultrasound biopsies: detection of clinically significant prostate cancers.
Hoeks CM; Schouten MG; Bomers JG; Hoogendoorn SP; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Hambrock T; Vergunst H; Sedelaar JP; Fütterer JJ; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2012 Nov; 62(5):902-9. PubMed ID: 22325447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Multiparametric MRI to improve detection of prostate cancer compared with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy alone: the PROMIS study.
Brown LC; Ahmed HU; Faria R; El-Shater Bosaily A; Gabe R; Kaplan RS; Parmar M; Collaco-Moraes Y; Ward K; Hindley RG; Freeman A; Kirkham A; Oldroyd R; Parker C; Bott S; Burns-Cox N; Dudderidge T; Ghei M; Henderson A; Persad R; Rosario DJ; Shergill I; Winkler M; Soares M; Spackman E; Sculpher M; Emberton M
Health Technol Assess; 2018 Jul; 22(39):1-176. PubMed ID: 30040065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Diagnostic accuracy of biparametric vs multiparametric MRI in clinically significant prostate cancer: Comparison between readers with different experience.
Di Campli E; Delli Pizzi A; Seccia B; Cianci R; d'Annibale M; Colasante A; Cinalli S; Castellan P; Navarra R; Iantorno R; Gabrielli D; Buffone A; Caulo M; Basilico R
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 101():17-23. PubMed ID: 29571792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
