125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35775879)
1. Consumer usability of flexible vs. rigid lower anchor hardware in infant child restraint system (CRS) installations.
Mansfield JA
Traffic Inj Prev; 2022; 23(sup1):S105-S110. PubMed ID: 35775879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Usability of non-standard lower anchor configurations for child restraint system (CRS) installation.
Mansfield JA; Zaragoza-Rivera YN; Bolte JH
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S8-S13. PubMed ID: 30570335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Vehicle LATCH system features associated with correct child restraint installations.
Klinich KD; Flannagan CA; Jermakian JS; McCartt AT; Manary MA; Moore JL; Wells JK
Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(5):520-31. PubMed ID: 23683089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. System providing automated feedback improves task learning outcomes during child restraint system (CRS) installations.
Mansfield JA; Bolte JH
Traffic Inj Prev; 2020; 21(8):575-580. PubMed ID: 33078961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. LATCH (Lower Anchors and Tethers for CHildren) usability in school buses and passenger vehicles.
Rudin-Brown CM; Scipione A; Armstrong J; Lai G; Salway A; Kumagai J
Traffic Inj Prev; 2008 Oct; 9(5):472-82. PubMed ID: 18836959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of child restraint lower attachment method on protection offered by forward facing child restraint systems in oblique loading conditions.
Hauschild HW; Humm JR; Pintar FA; Yoganandan N; Kaufman B; Maltese MR; Arbogast KB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S139-S145. PubMed ID: 29584498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of interventions to make top tether hardware more visible during child restraint system (CRS) installations.
Mansfield JA; Zaragoza-Rivera YN; Baker GH; Bolte JH
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(5):534-539. PubMed ID: 31194584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Vehicle characteristics associated with LATCH use and correct use in real-world child restraint installations.
Cicchino JB; Jermakian JS
J Safety Res; 2015 Jun; 53():77-85. PubMed ID: 25934000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of child restraint system features on installation errors.
Klinich KD; Manary MA; Flannagan CA; Ebert SM; Malik LA; Green PA; Reed MP
Appl Ergon; 2014 Mar; 45(2):270-7. PubMed ID: 23731627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating the Effect of a Mechanical Adjunct to Improve the Installation of Child Restraint Systems to Vehicles.
Mirman JH; Seifert SJ; Zonfrillo MR; Metzger K; Durbin DR; Arbogast KB
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S24-31. PubMed ID: 26436238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing tether anchor labeling and usability in pickup trucks.
Klinich KD; Manary MA; Malik LA; Flannagan CA; Jermakian JS
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Apr; 19(3):287-291. PubMed ID: 29083943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of LATCH versus Available Seatbelt Installation of Rear Facing Child Restraint Systems on Head Injury Criteria for 6 Month Old Infants in Rear End Collisions.
Williams JR; O'Donel CA; Leiss PJ
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2():S16-23. PubMed ID: 26436226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Observed LATCH use and misuse characteristics of child restraint systems in seven states.
Decina LE; Lococo KH
J Safety Res; 2007; 38(3):273-81. PubMed ID: 17617236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ease of Use ratings and real-world child restraint system errors from Safe Kids Illinois seat checks, 2015-2019.
Macy ML; Lee JY; Kendi S; Zonfrillo MR; Hill A
Traffic Inj Prev; 2023; 24(7):625-631. PubMed ID: 37477419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Child safety in cars: An observational study on the use of child restraint systems in The Netherlands.
Cornelissen M; Hermans M; Tuijl L; Versteeg M; van Beeck E; Kemler E
Traffic Inj Prev; 2021; 22(8):634-639. PubMed ID: 34714192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of child restraint misuse on dynamic performance.
Manary MA; Flannagan CAC; Reed MP; Orton NR; Klinich KD
Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(8):860-865. PubMed ID: 31670975
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Using interactive virtual presence to support accurate installation of child restraints: Efficacy and parental perceptions.
Schwebel DC; Tillman MA; Crew M; Muller M; Johnston A
J Safety Res; 2017 Sep; 62():235-243. PubMed ID: 28882272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of new legislation on child restraint system (CRS) misuse and inappropriate use in Australia.
Koppel S; Charlton JL; Rudin-Brown CM
Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 23531262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Study protocol: a randomised non-inferiority trial using interactive virtual presence to remotely assist parents with child restraint installations.
Schwebel DC; MacKay JM; Redden D
Inj Prev; 2020 Jun; 26(3):289-294. PubMed ID: 31727672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Field use patterns and performance of child restraints secured by lower anchors and tethers for children (LATCH).
Arbogast KB; Jermakian JS
Accid Anal Prev; 2007 May; 39(3):530-5. PubMed ID: 17270136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
