117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3577737)
1. Bone cement improved by vacuum mixing and chilling.
Lidgren L; Bodelind B; Möller J
Acta Orthop Scand; 1987 Feb; 58(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 3577737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Strength of polymethylmethacrylate increased by vacuum mixing.
Lidgren L; Drar H; Möller J
Acta Orthop Scand; 1984 Oct; 55(5):536-41. PubMed ID: 6507076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of temperature and vacuum mixing on bone cement properties.
Smeds S; Goertzen D; Ivarsson I
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Jan; (334):326-34. PubMed ID: 9005930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Static and fatigue properties of two new low-viscosity PMMA bone cements improved by vacuum mixing.
Fritsch EW
J Biomed Mater Res; 1996 Aug; 31(4):451-6. PubMed ID: 8836840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vacuum mixing of acrylic bone cement.
Wixson RL; Lautenschlager EP; Novak MA
J Arthroplasty; 1987; 2(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 3612140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimization and comparison of three vacuum mixing systems for porosity reduction of Simplex P cement.
Davies JP; Harris WH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 May; (254):261-9. PubMed ID: 2323141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Mechanical properties of new low viscosity bone cements--can be improved by vacuum mixing].
Kaltenkirchen N; Fritsch E; Rupp S; Kraus P
Unfallchirurg; 1996 Jul; 99(7):492-7. PubMed ID: 8928019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [New PMMA bone cements for vacuum mixing systems].
Schelling K; Heisel C; Schnürer SM; Mau H; Breusch SJ
Orthopade; 2002 Jun; 31(6):556-62. PubMed ID: 12149927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mechanical characterization of commercially made carbon-fiber-reinforced polymethylmethacrylate.
Saha S; Pal S
J Biomed Mater Res; 1986; 20(6):817-26. PubMed ID: 3722216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of vacuum mixing on the mechanical properties of antibiotic-impregnated polymethylmethacrylate bone cement.
Askew MJ; Kufel MF; Fleissner PR; Gradisar IA; Salstrom SJ; Tan JS
J Biomed Mater Res; 1990 May; 24(5):573-80. PubMed ID: 2324127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does vacuum-mixing improve the fatigue properties of high-viscosity poly(methyl-methacrylate) (PMMA) bone cement? Comparison between two different evacuation methods.
Fritsch E; Rupp S; Kaltenkirchen N
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 1996; 115(3-4):131-5. PubMed ID: 8861576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mixing does not improve mechanical properties of all bone cements. Manual and centrifugation-vacuum mixing compared for 10 cement brands.
Hansen D; Jensen JS
Acta Orthop Scand; 1992 Feb; 63(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 1738962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Creep characteristics of hand- and vacuum-mixed acrylic bone cement at elevated stress levels.
Norman TL; Kish V; Blaha JD; Gruen TA; Hustosky K
J Biomed Mater Res; 1995 Apr; 29(4):495-501. PubMed ID: 7622534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prechilling and vacuum mixing not suitable for all bone cements. Handling characteristics and exotherms of bone cements.
Hansen D; Jensen JS
J Arthroplasty; 1990 Dec; 5(4):287-90. PubMed ID: 2290082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of the Advanced One-Step Mixing System Under Non-Vacuum on the Mechanical Properties of Acrylic Bone Cement.
Schommer JV; Chong AC; Erickson TD
Iowa Orthop J; 2024; 44(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 38919359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of vacuum mixing and pre-heating the femoral component on the mechanical properties of the cement mantle.
Baleani M; Bialoblocka-Juszczyk E; Engels GE; Viceconti M
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Mar; 92(3):454-60. PubMed ID: 20190321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of preparation techniques on the porosity of acrylic cements.
Schreurs BW; Spierings PT; Huiskes R; Slooff TJ
Acta Orthop Scand; 1988 Aug; 59(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 3421077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [A study on the mechanical properties of bone cement (methylmethacrylate) and its strength alteration in vivo (author's transl)].
Kon H
Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1981 Jan; 55(1):71-83. PubMed ID: 7276662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of the mechanical properties of Simplex, Zimmer, and Zimmer low viscosity bone cements.
Weber SC; Bargar WL
Biomater Med Devices Artif Organs; 1983; 11(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 6615994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The clinical significance of vacuum mixing bone cement.
Geiger MH; Keating EM; Ritter MA; Ginther JA; Faris PM; Meding JB
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2001 Jan; (382):258-66. PubMed ID: 11153996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
