These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35777632)

  • 1. The selective use of punishments on congruent versus incongruent trials in the Stroop task.
    Yang Q; Xing J; Braem S; Pourtois G
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2022 Sep; 193():107654. PubMed ID: 35777632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selective reinforcement of conflict processing in the Stroop task.
    Prével A; Krebs RM; Kukkonen N; Braem S
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0255430. PubMed ID: 34329341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Parsing the contributions of negative affect vs. aversive motivation to cognitive control: an experimental investigation.
    Yang Q; Si S; Pourtois G
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2023; 17():1209824. PubMed ID: 37791110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Motivational and cognitive determinants of control during conflict processing.
    Soutschek A; Strobach T; Schubert T
    Cogn Emot; 2014; 28(6):1076-89. PubMed ID: 24344784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. It's more than just conflict: The functional role of congruency in the sequential control adaptation.
    Berger A; Fischer R; Dreisbach G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jun; 197():64-72. PubMed ID: 31103922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Attentional control adjustments in Eriksen and Stroop task performance can be independent of response conflict.
    Lamers MJ; Roelofs A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1056-81. PubMed ID: 21113864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating the learning of stimulus-control associations through incidental memory of reinforcement events.
    Bejjani C; Egner T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Oct; 47(10):1599-1621. PubMed ID: 34498904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Item-specific control of attention in the Stroop task: Contingency learning is not the whole story in the item-specific proportion-congruent effect.
    Spinelli G; Lupker SJ
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Apr; 48(3):426-435. PubMed ID: 31705394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance-contingent reward increases the use of congruent distracting information.
    Fröber K; Lerche V
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Apr; 85(3):905-929. PubMed ID: 36918512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reduced flexibility of cognitive control: reactive, but not proactive control, underpins the congruency sequence effect.
    Yang Q; Pourtois G
    Psychol Res; 2022 Mar; 86(2):474-484. PubMed ID: 33779833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cognitive control during a spatial Stroop task: Comparing conflict monitoring and prediction of response-outcome theories.
    Pires L; Leitão J; Guerrini C; Simões MR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():63-75. PubMed ID: 28683927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sequential congruency effects: disentangling priming and conflict adaptation.
    Puccioni O; Vallesi A
    Psychol Res; 2012 Sep; 76(5):591-600. PubMed ID: 21735040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiple expectancies underlie the congruency sequence effect in confound-minimized tasks.
    Erb CD; Aschenbrenner AJ
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102869. PubMed ID: 31228719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of frontopolar cortex in the individual differences in conflict adaptation.
    Lee Y; Kim C
    Neurosci Lett; 2019 Jul; 705():212-218. PubMed ID: 31054332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exploring relations between task conflict and informational conflict in the Stroop task.
    Entel O; Tzelgov J; Bereby-Meyer Y; Shahar N
    Psychol Res; 2015 Nov; 79(6):913-27. PubMed ID: 25420632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conflict Adaptation in Aphasia: Upregulating Cognitive Control for Improved Sentence Comprehension.
    Krason A; Middleton EL; Ambrogi MEP; Thothathiri M
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Nov; 67(11):4411-4430. PubMed ID: 39378278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robust evidence for proactive conflict adaptation in the proportion-congruent paradigm.
    Spinelli G; Lupker SJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 May; 49(5):675-700. PubMed ID: 35787140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modality-specific neural mechanisms of cognitive control in a Stroop-like task.
    Li Z; Yang G; Wu H; Li Q; Xu H; Göschl F; Nolte G; Liu X
    Brain Cogn; 2021 Feb; 147():105662. PubMed ID: 33360042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The congruency sequence effect 3.0: a critical test of conflict adaptation.
    Duthoo W; Abrahamse EL; Braem S; Boehler CN; Notebaert W
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e110462. PubMed ID: 25340396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sequential conflict resolution under multiple concurrent conflicts: An ERP study.
    Rey-Mermet A; Gade M; Steinhauser M
    Neuroimage; 2019 Mar; 188():411-418. PubMed ID: 30562575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.