143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35778186)
1. Ultrasonic backscatter coefficient estimation in nonlinear regime using an in situ calibration target.
Coila A; Oelze ML
J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Jun; 151(6):4196. PubMed ID: 35778186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Estimation of Backscatter Coefficients Using an In Situ Calibration Source.
Nguyen TN; Tam AJ; Do MN; Oelze ML
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2020 Feb; 67(2):308-317. PubMed ID: 31567079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of acoustic nonlinearities on the ultrasonic backscatter coefficient estimation.
Coila A; Oelze ML
J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Jul; 146(1):85. PubMed ID: 31370607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In Vivo Validation of an In Situ Calibration Bead as a Reference for Backscatter Coefficient Calculation.
Zhao Y; Czarnota GJ; Park TH; Miller RJ; Oelze ML
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2024 Jun; 50(6):833-842. PubMed ID: 38471999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5.
Zhao Y; Czarnota GJ; Park TH; Miller RJ; Oelze ML
bioRxiv; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38370712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Theoretical and phantom based investigation of the impact of sound speed and backscatter variations on attenuation slope estimation.
Omari E; Lee H; Varghese T
Ultrasonics; 2011 Aug; 51(6):758-67. PubMed ID: 21477832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Power Spectrum Consistency among Systems and Transducers.
Guerrero QW; Fan L; Brunke S; Milkowski A; Rosado-Mendez IM; Hall TJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 44(11):2358-2370. PubMed ID: 30093341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Identifying and overcoming limitations with in situ calibration beads for quantitative ultrasound.
Cario J; Coila A; Zhao Y; Miller RJ; L Oelze M
J Acoust Soc Am; 2022 Apr; 151(4):2701. PubMed ID: 35461481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Interlaboratory comparison of backscatter coefficient estimates for tissue-mimicking phantoms.
Anderson JJ; Herd MT; King MR; Haak A; Hafez ZT; Song J; Oelze ML; Madsen EL; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
Ultrason Imaging; 2010 Jan; 32(1):48-64. PubMed ID: 20690431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pulse-Echo Technique to Compensate for Laminate Membrane Transmission Loss in Phantom-Based Ultrasonic Attenuation Coefficient Measurements.
Nagabhushana K; Wang Q; Han A
J Ultrasound Med; 2023 Jan; 42(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 35615811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of acoustic nonlinearity on pulse-echo attenuation coefficient estimation from tissue-mimicking phantoms.
Coila A; Oelze ML
J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Aug; 148(2):805. PubMed ID: 32873024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the impact of backscatter intensity variations on ultrasound attenuation estimation.
Omari EA; Varghese T; Madsen EL; Frank G
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):082904. PubMed ID: 23927359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cross-imaging system comparison of backscatter coefficient estimates from a tissue-mimicking material.
Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Wirtzfeld LA; Kumar V; Madsen EL; Ghoshal G; Pawlicki AD; Oelze ML; Lavarello RJ; Bigelow TA; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1319-24. PubMed ID: 22978860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Acoustic backscatter and effective scatterer size estimates using a 2D CMUT transducer.
Liu W; Zagzebski JA; Hall TJ; Madsen EL; Varghese T; Kliewer MA; Panda S; Lowery C; Barnes S
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 53(15):4169-83. PubMed ID: 18635893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Normalization and backscatter spectral analysis of human carotid arterial data acquired using a clinical linear array ultrasound imaging system.
Sareen M; Waters K; Nair A; Vince DG
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2008; 2008():2968-71. PubMed ID: 19163329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of Clutter Filter in High-Frame-Rate Ultrasonic Backscatter Coefficient Analysis.
Omura M; Yagi K; Nagaoka R; Yoshida K; Yamaguchi T; Hasegawa H
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Feb; 23(5):. PubMed ID: 36904843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Backscattering measurement from a single microdroplet.
Lee J; Chang JH; Jeong JS; Lee C; Teh SY; Lee A; Shung KK
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 Apr; 58(4):874-9. PubMed ID: 21507767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Backscatter coefficient estimation using tapers with gaps.
Luchies AC; Oelze ML
Ultrason Imaging; 2015 Apr; 37(2):117-34. PubMed ID: 25189857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative Ultrasound: Experimental Implementation.
Oelze M
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2023; 1403():29-42. PubMed ID: 37495913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of ultrasound attenuation and backscatter estimates in layered tissue-mimicking phantoms among three clinical scanners.
Nam K; Rosado-Mendez IM; Wirtzfeld LA; Ghoshal G; Pawlicki AD; Madsen EL; Lavarello RJ; Oelze ML; Zagzebski JA; O'Brien WD; Hall TJ
Ultrason Imaging; 2012 Oct; 34(4):209-21. PubMed ID: 23160474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
