182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35780448)
21. Magnetically controlled growing rod treatment for early-onset scoliosis: analysis of 52 consecutive cases demonstrates improvement of coronal deformity.
Ellinger F; Tropp H; Gerdhem P; Hallgren HB; Ivars K
J Spine Surg; 2023 Sep; 9(3):259-268. PubMed ID: 37841788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Proximal anchor fixation in magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR): preliminary 2-year results of the impact of anchor location and density.
Meza BC; Shah SA; Vitale MG; Sturm PF; Luhmann SJ; ; Anari JB
Spine Deform; 2020 Aug; 8(4):793-800. PubMed ID: 32189230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparing health-related quality of life and burden of care between early-onset scoliosis patients treated with magnetically controlled growing rods and traditional growing rods: a multicenter study.
Matsumoto H; Skaggs DL; Akbarnia BA; Pawelek JB; Hilaire TS; Levine S; Sturm P; Perez-Grueso FJS; Luhmann SJ; Sponseller PD; Smith JT; White KK; Vitale MG;
Spine Deform; 2021 Jan; 9(1):239-245. PubMed ID: 32851598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Growth-preserving instrumentation for early onset scoliosis].
Stücker R; Mladenov K; Stücker S
Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2024 Feb; 36(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 37812237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The effect of magnetically controlled growing rods on three-dimensional changes in deformity correction.
Cheung JPY; Cheung PWH; Cheung KMC
Spine Deform; 2020 Jun; 8(3):537-546. PubMed ID: 32072490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Single distraction-rod constructs in severe early-onset scoliosis: Indications and outcomes.
Luhmann SJ; Skaggs DL; Pahys J; Samdani A; El-Hawary R
Spine J; 2022 Feb; 22(2):305-312. PubMed ID: 34547389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Outcomes of Primary and Conversion Magnetically Controlled Growth Rods Are Different at Two-Year Follow-up: Results of North American Release.
Hung CW; Vitale MG; Samdani A; Matsumoto H; Smith JT; Sturm PF; Sponseller PD; Luhmann SJ; St Hilaire T; El-Hawary R; Sawyer JR
Spine Deform; 2019 Sep; 7(5):829-835. PubMed ID: 31495485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A comparison of the post-fusion outcome of patients with early-onset scoliosis treated with traditional and magnetically controlled growing rods.
Tahir M; Mehta D; Sandhu C; Jones M; Gardner A; Mehta JS
Bone Joint J; 2022 Feb; 104-B(2):257-264. PubMed ID: 35094579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Health-Related Quality of Life in Early-Onset Scoliosis Patients Treated Surgically: EOSQ Scores in Traditional Growing Rod Versus Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods.
Doany ME; Olgun ZD; Kinikli GI; Bekmez S; Kocyigit A; Demirkiran G; Karaagaoglu AE; Yazici M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Jan; 43(2):148-153. PubMed ID: 28604490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Lengthening Behavior of Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods in Early-Onset Scoliosis: A Multicenter Study.
Heyer JH; Anari JB; Baldwin KD; Mitchell SL; Luhmann SJ; Sturm PF; Flynn JM; Cahill PJ;
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2022 Dec; 104(24):2186-2194. PubMed ID: 36367763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Traditional Growing Rods Versus Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods for the Surgical Treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis: A Case-Matched 2-Year Study.
Akbarnia BA; Pawelek JB; Cheung KM; Demirkiran G; Elsebaie H; Emans JB; Johnston CE; Mundis GM; Noordeen H; Skaggs DL; Sponseller PD; Thompson GH; Yaszay B; Yazici M;
Spine Deform; 2014 Nov; 2(6):493-497. PubMed ID: 27927412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. 3-Year follow-up of a single magnetically controlled growing rod with contralateral gliding system and apical control for early onset scoliosis.
Wijdicks SPJ; Skov ST; Li H; Castelein RM; Kruyt MC; Bünger C
Spine Deform; 2020 Aug; 8(4):751-761. PubMed ID: 32232747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Health-related quality of life and clinical outcomes for magnetically controlled growing rod patients after treatment termination.
Jamnik AA; Shaw KA; Thornberg D; McClung A; Jo CH; Ramo B; McIntosh A
Spine Deform; 2024 May; 12(3):853-863. PubMed ID: 38219256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Minimum 5-Year Follow-up on Graduates of Growing Spine Surgery for Early Onset Scoliosis.
Murphy RF; Barfield WR; Emans JB; Akbarnia B; Thompson G; Sponseller P; Skaggs D; Marks D; Smith JT; Flynn J; Presson A; Sawyer JR; Johnston C;
J Pediatr Orthop; 2020; 40(10):e942-e946. PubMed ID: 32773654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Identifying complications and failure modes of innovative growing rod configurations using the (hybrid) magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) and the spring distraction system (SDS).
Lemans JVC; Tabeling CS; Castelein RM; Kruyt MC
Spine Deform; 2021 Nov; 9(6):1679-1689. PubMed ID: 34156666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Traditional growing rod versus magnetically controlled growing rod for treatment of early onset scoliosis: Cost analysis from implantation till skeletal maturity.
Wong CKH; Cheung JPY; Cheung PWH; Lam CLK; Cheung KMC
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2017; 25(2):2309499017705022. PubMed ID: 28481128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparative efficacy and complications of single and dual growing rods for early-onset scoliosis: an updated meta-analysis.
Wang T; Fan N; Zang L; Yuan S; Du P; Si F; Wang A; Li J; Kong X; Zhu W
Eur Spine J; 2023 Jan; 32(1):167-180. PubMed ID: 36509886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Single vs dual rod constructs in early onset scoliosis treated with magnetically controlled growing rods.
Urbański W; Tucker S; Ember T; Nadarajah R
Adv Clin Exp Med; 2020 Oct; 29(10):1169-1174. PubMed ID: 33064377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Reliability of Rod Lengthening, Thoracic, and Spino-Pelvic Measurements on Biplanar Stereoradiography in Patients Treated With Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods.
Obid P; Yiu KKL; Cheung KM; Kwan K; Ruf M; Cheung JPY
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Nov; 43(22):1579-1585. PubMed ID: 29649090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Treatment of early-onset scoliosis with a hybrid of a concave magnetic driver (magnetic controlled growth rod) and a contralateral passive sliding rod construct with apical control: preliminary report on 17 cases.
Skov ST; Wijdicks SPJ; Bünger C; Castelein RM; Li H; Kruyt MC
Spine J; 2018 Jan; 18(1):122-129. PubMed ID: 28687252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
