These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35783641)

  • 21. Research involving storage and use of human tissue: how did the Human Tissue Act 2004 affect decisions by research ethics committees?
    Angell E; Tarrant C; Dixon-Woods M
    J Clin Pathol; 2009 Sep; 62(9):825-9. PubMed ID: 19734481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.
    Emadi A; Chua JV; Talwani R; Bentzen SM; Baddley J
    Trials; 2020 Oct; 21(1):897. PubMed ID: 33115543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reporting ethical processes in two Indian journals.
    Bavdekar SB; Gogtay NJ; Wagh S
    Indian J Med Sci; 2008 Apr; 62(4):134-40. PubMed ID: 18445979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Performance of research ethics committees in Spain. A prospective study of 100 applications for clinical trial protocols on medicines.
    Dal-Ré R; Espada J; Ortega R
    J Med Ethics; 1999 Jun; 25(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 10390685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Results of a self-assessment tool to assess the operational characteristics of research ethics committees in low- and middle-income countries.
    Silverman H; Sleem H; Moodley K; Kumar N; Naidoo S; Subramanian T; Jaafar R; Moni M
    J Med Ethics; 2015 Apr; 41(4):332-7. PubMed ID: 24748650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Status of healthcare studies submitted to UK research ethics committees for approval in 2004-5.
    Arshad A; Arkwright PD
    J Med Ethics; 2008 May; 34(5):393-5. PubMed ID: 18448724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Ethical aspects in tissue research: thematic analysis of ethical statements to the research ethics committee.
    Halkoaho A; Pietilä AM; Vesalainen M; Vähäkangas K
    BMC Med Ethics; 2012 Aug; 13():20. PubMed ID: 22873761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Informed consent and ethics committee approval in laboratory medicine.
    Borovecki A; Mlinaric A; Horvat M; Supak Smolcic V
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2018 Oct; 28(3):030201. PubMed ID: 30429665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An analysis of decision letters by research ethics committees: the ethics/scientific quality boundary examined.
    Angell EL; Bryman A; Ashcroft RE; Dixon-Woods M
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2008 Apr; 17(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 18385408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Differences between research ethics committees.
    Edwards SJ; Stone T; Swift T
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2007; 23(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 17234012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Use of Template Documents with Guidance to Improve the Quality of Human Subjects Research Protocol Submissions to a Thai Research Ethics Committee.
    Khawcharoenporn T; Chimkhong W; Roestpricha V
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2021 Dec; 16(5):501-513. PubMed ID: 34125621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The reporting of research ethics committee approval and informed consent in otolaryngology journals.
    Murphy S; Nolan C; O'Rourke C; Fenton JE
    Clin Otolaryngol; 2015 Feb; 40(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 25311504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Do research ethics committees identify process errors in applications for ethical approval?
    Angell E; Dixon-Woods M
    J Med Ethics; 2009 Feb; 35(2):130-2. PubMed ID: 19181888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Applying for ethical approval for research: the main issues.
    Gelling L
    Nurs Stand; 2016 Jan; 30(20):40-4. PubMed ID: 26758167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Training needs assessment in research ethics evaluation among research ethics committee members in three African countries: Cameroon, Mali and Tanzania.
    Ateudjieu J; Williams J; Hirtle M; Baume C; Ikingura J; Niaré A; Sprumont D
    Dev World Bioeth; 2010 Aug; 10(2):88-98. PubMed ID: 19912281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The evaluation of complex clinical trial protocols: resources available to research ethics committees and the use of clinical trial registries--a case study.
    Homedes N; Ugalde A
    J Med Ethics; 2015 Jun; 41(6):464-9. PubMed ID: 25341735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quality of consent forms in pharmacogenetic studies: a survey of research ethics committees in Spain.
    Ruiz-Canela M; Baena-Molina MJ
    Per Med; 2006 Aug; 3(3):231-237. PubMed ID: 29788653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Law, ethics and research ethics committees.
    Beyleveld D
    Med Law; 2002; 21(1):57-75. PubMed ID: 12017445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of clinical trials by Ethics Committees in Germany--results and a comparison of two surveys performed among members of the German Association of Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies (vfa).
    Russ H; Busta S; Jost B; Bethke TD
    Ger Med Sci; 2015; 13():Doc02. PubMed ID: 25698912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Can we do better? Researchers' experiences with ethical review boards on projects with later life as a focus.
    Pachana NA; Liddle J; Peel NM; Beattie E; Juang C; Knight BG
    J Alzheimers Dis; 2015; 43(3):701-7. PubMed ID: 25374104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.