These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35784137)
1. Influence of pecking frequency at working length on the volume of apically extruded debris: A micro-computed tomography analysis. Wang LX; Chen H; Lin RT; Gu LS J Dent Sci; 2022 Jul; 17(3):1274-1280. PubMed ID: 35784137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of the Number of Pecking Motions at Working Length on the Shaping Ability of Single-file Systems in Long Oval-shaped Curved Canals. Wang L; Lin R; Chen H; Li Z; Tay FR; Gu L J Endod; 2022 Apr; 48(4):548-554. PubMed ID: 35081440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of Different Glide Path Files on Apical Debris Extrusion in Curved Root Canals. Gunes B; Yesildal Yeter K J Endod; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1191-1194. PubMed ID: 29884338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of a glide path on apical extrusion of debris during canal preparation using single-file systems in curved canals. Topçuoğlu HS; Düzgün S; Akpek F; Topçuoğlu G; Aktı A Int Endod J; 2016 Jun; 49(6):599-603. PubMed ID: 26084620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Extrusion of Debris from Curved Root Canals Instrumented up to Different Working Lengths Using Different Reciprocating Systems. Mendonça de Moura JD; Bueno CEDS; Fontana CE; Pelegrine RA J Endod; 2019 Jul; 45(7):930-934. PubMed ID: 31109752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of Debris Extrusion in Curved Canals: An In Vitro Analysis of Various Single-File Endodontic Instrumentation Systems. Ahmad MZ Int J Dent; 2024; 2024():8367693. PubMed ID: 39007058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bacteria and Hard Tissue Debris Extrusion and Intracanal Bacterial Reduction Promoted by XP-endo Shaper and Reciproc Instruments. Alves FRF; Paiva PL; Marceliano-Alves MF; Cabreira LJ; Lima KC; Siqueira JF; Rôças IN; Provenzano JC J Endod; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1173-1178. PubMed ID: 29861066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Apically Extruded Debris during Root Canal Instrumentation with Reciproc Blue, HyFlex EDM, and XP-endo Shaper Nickel-titanium Files. Uslu G; Özyürek T; Yılmaz K; Gündoğar M; Plotino G J Endod; 2018 May; 44(5):856-859. PubMed ID: 29550013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Apically Extruded Debris in Curved Root Canals Using the WaveOne Gold Reciprocating and Twisted File Adaptive Systems. Boijink D; Costa DD; Hoppe CB; Kopper PMP; Grecca FS J Endod; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1289-1292. PubMed ID: 29908692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Apically extruded debris produced during glide path preparation using R-Pilot, WaveOne Gold Glider and ProGlider in curved root canals. Keskin C; Sivas Yilmaz Ö; Inan U Aust Endod J; 2020 Dec; 46(3):439-444. PubMed ID: 32820600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of different glide path techniques on the amount of extruded debris and preparation times during root canal preparation. Kırıcı D; Koç S; Kuştarcı A J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2020; 14(3):187-190. PubMed ID: 33408825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficiency of ProTaper Universal Retreatment, Reciproc Blue and XP-endo Shaper in the removal of a bioceramic-based root canal filling. Ciftcioglu E; Sungur Guzel R; Akbal Dincer G; Karakaya G; Kucukay ES Eur Oral Res; 2023 Sep; 57(3):159-164. PubMed ID: 37929225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of apically extruded debris and irrigant produced by different nickel-titanium instrument systems. Küçükyilmaz E; Savas S; Saygili G; Uysal B Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():1-6. PubMed ID: 25387860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison between Single-file Rotary Systems: Part 1-Efficiency, Effectiveness, and Adverse Effects in Endodontic Retreatment. Azim AA; Wang HH; Tarrosh M; Azim KA; Piasecki L J Endod; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1720-1724. PubMed ID: 30243662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Apical debris extrusion associated with oval shaped canals: a comparative study of WaveOne vs Self-Adjusting File. Farmakis ET; Sotiropoulos GG; Abràmovitz I; Solomonov M Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Nov; 20(8):2131-2138. PubMed ID: 26759337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of apically extruded debris during the removal of canal filling material using three different Ni-Ti systems and hand files in teeth with simulated apical root resorption. Topçuoğlu HS; Demirbuga S; Topçuoğlu G Int Endod J; 2020 Mar; 53(3):403-409. PubMed ID: 31605377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Efficiency and apical extrusion of debris: a comparative ex vivo study of four retreatment techniques in severely curved root canals. Kaşıkçı Bilgi I; Köseler I; Güneri P; Hülsmann M; Çalışkan MK Int Endod J; 2017 Sep; 50(9):910-918. PubMed ID: 27706822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Apical extrusion of debris during the preparation of oval root canals: a comparative study between a full-sequence SAF system and a rotary file system supplemented by XP-endo finisher file. Kfir A; Moza-Levi R; Herteanu M; Weissman A; Wigler R Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Mar; 22(2):707-713. PubMed ID: 28608053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of coronal flaring on apical extrusion of debris during root canal instrumentation using single-file systems. Topçuoğlu HS; Üstün Y; Akpek F; Aktı A; Topçuoğlu G Int Endod J; 2016 Sep; 49(9):884-889. PubMed ID: 26283644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of Apical Preparation Size and Working Length on Debris Extrusion. Silva EJ; Teixeira JM; Kudsi N; Sassone LM; Krebs RL; Coutinho-Filho TS Braz Dent J; 2016; 27(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 27007341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]