These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35784431)

  • 1. Self-identification of electronically scanned signatures (ESS) and digitally constructed signatures (DCS).
    Kazmierczyk Z; Turner IJ
    Forensic Sci Res; 2022; 7(2):261-264. PubMed ID: 35784431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Examining Authenticity: An Initial Exploration of the Suitability of Handwritten Electronic Signatures.
    Heckeroth J; Boywitt CD
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Jun; 275():144-154. PubMed ID: 28364722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recommendations for capturing signatures digitally to optimize their suitability for forensic handwriting examination.
    Geistová Čakovská B; Kalantzis N; Dziedzic T; Fernandes C; Zimmer J; Branco MJ; Heckeroth J; Spjuth KA; Kupferschmid E; Vaccarone P; Kerkoff A
    J Forensic Sci; 2021 Mar; 66(2):743-747. PubMed ID: 33206397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic characteristics of signatures: effects of writer style on genuine and simulated signatures.
    Mohammed L; Found B; Caligiuri M; Rogers D
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 25420668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of time on dynamic signature: An exploratory data analysis.
    Linden J; Marquis R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Jul; 348():111577. PubMed ID: 37148783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian evaluation of dynamic signatures in operational conditions.
    Jacques L; Silvia B; Raymond M; Franco T
    Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Mar; 332():111173. PubMed ID: 35066400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Signature dynamics in Alzheimer's disease.
    Caligiuri MP; Mohammed L
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Sep; 302():109880. PubMed ID: 31390576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are expert penmen better than lay people at producing simulations of a model signature?
    Dewhurst T; Found B; Rogers D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Aug; 180(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 18703294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Features of digitally captured signatures vs. pen and paper signatures: Similar or completely different?
    Heckeroth J; Kupferschmid E; Dziedzic T; Kalantzis N; Geistová Čakovská B; Fernandes C; Branco MJ; Axelsson Spjuth K; Kerkhoff A; Vaccarone P; Zimmer J; Schmidt P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Jan; 318():110587. PubMed ID: 33248328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of extrinsic motivation on signature authorship opinions in forensic signature blind trials.
    Dewhurst TN; Found B; Ballantyne KN; Rogers D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2014 Mar; 236():127-32. PubMed ID: 24529783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling the lexical morphology of Western handwritten signatures.
    Diaz-Cabrera M; Ferrer MA; Morales A
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(4):e0123254. PubMed ID: 25860942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Forensic handwriting examiners' expertise for signature comparison.
    Sita J; Found B; Rogers DK
    J Forensic Sci; 2002 Sep; 47(5):1117-24. PubMed ID: 12353558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The probative character of Forensic Handwriting Examiners' identification and elimination opinions on questioned signatures.
    Found B; Rogers D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Jun; 178(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 18367353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An examination of handwritten signatures forged using photosensitive signature stamp.
    Li Z; Liu X
    Forensic Sci Res; 2021; 6(2):168-182. PubMed ID: 34377575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digitally captured signatures: A method for the normalization of force through calibration and the use of the zeta function.
    Kalantzis N; Platt AWG
    J Forensic Sci; 2022 Mar; 67(2):651-668. PubMed ID: 34729778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Forensic Analysis of Digital Dynamic Signatures: New Methods for Data Treatment and Feature Evaluation.
    Linden J; Marquis R; Mazzella W
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 Mar; 62(2):382-391. PubMed ID: 27859241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Forensic handwriting examiners' opinions on the process of production of disguised and simulated signatures.
    Bird C; Found B; Ballantyne K; Rogers D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Feb; 195(1-3):103-7. PubMed ID: 20060668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The challenge of comparing digitally captured signatures registered with different software and hardware.
    Zimmer J; Kalantzis N; Dziedzic T; Heckeroth J; Kupferschmid E; Fernandes C; Geistová Čakovská B; Branco MJ; Axelsson Spjuth K; Vaccarone P; Kerkhoff A
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Oct; 327():110945. PubMed ID: 34418647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An insight into forensic document examiner expertise for discriminating between forged and disguised signatures.
    Dyer AG; Found B; Rogers D
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Sep; 53(5):1154-9. PubMed ID: 18624887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Visual attention and expertise for forensic signature analysis.
    Dyer AG; Found B; Rogers D
    J Forensic Sci; 2006 Nov; 51(6):1397-404. PubMed ID: 17199627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.