These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35785713)

  • 1. A user study of directional tactile and auditory user interfaces for take-over requests in conditionally automated vehicles.
    Gruden T; Tomažič S; Sodnik J; Jakus G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106766. PubMed ID: 35785713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Drivers' gaze patterns when resuming control with a head-up-display: Effects of automation level and time budget.
    Xu C; Louw TL; Merat N; Li P; Hu M; Li Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Feb; 180():106905. PubMed ID: 36508949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Take-over again: Investigating multimodal and directional TORs to get the driver back into the loop.
    Petermeijer S; Bazilinskyy P; Bengler K; de Winter J
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Jul; 62():204-215. PubMed ID: 28411731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Repeated conditionally automated driving on the road: How do drivers leave the loop over time?
    Dillmann J; Den Hartigh RJR; Kurpiers CM; Raisch FK; Kadrileev N; Cox RFA; De Waard D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Mar; 181():106927. PubMed ID: 36584619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Understanding take-over performance of high crash risk drivers during conditionally automated driving.
    Lin Q; Li S; Ma X; Lu G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Aug; 143():105543. PubMed ID: 32485431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Driver compliance to take-over requests with different auditory outputs in conditional automation.
    Forster Y; Naujoks F; Neukum A; Huestegge L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Dec; 109():18-28. PubMed ID: 28992451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Driver Visual Attention Before and After Take-Over Requests During Automated Driving on Public Roads.
    Pipkorn L; Dozza M; Tivesten E
    Hum Factors; 2024 Feb; 66(2):336-347. PubMed ID: 35708240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of information from dash-based human-machine interfaces on drivers' gaze patterns and lane-change manoeuvres after conditionally automated driving.
    Gonçalves RC; Louw TL; Madigan R; Quaresma M; Romano R; Merat N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Sep; 174():106726. PubMed ID: 35716544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Driver-Automated Vehicle Interaction in Mixed Traffic: Types of Interaction and Drivers' Driving Styles.
    Ma Z; Zhang Y
    Hum Factors; 2024 Feb; 66(2):544-561. PubMed ID: 35469464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enhancing safety in conditionally automated driving: Can more takeover request visual information make a difference in hazard scenarios with varied hazard visibility?
    Huang WC; Fan LH; Han ZJ; Niu YF
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Sep; 205():107687. PubMed ID: 38943983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What happens when drivers of automated vehicles take over control in critical brake situations?
    Roche F; Thüring M; Trukenbrod AK
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 144():105588. PubMed ID: 32531374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Get Ready for Take-Overs: Using Head-Up Display for Drivers to Engage in Non-Driving-Related Tasks in Automated Vehicles.
    Li X; Schroeter R; Rakotonirainy A; Kuo J; Lenné MG
    Hum Factors; 2023 Dec; 65(8):1759-1775. PubMed ID: 34865560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of Imminent Take-Over Requests With Real Automation on a Test Track.
    Wintersberger P; Schartmüller C; Sadeghian S; Frison AK; Riener A
    Hum Factors; 2023 Dec; 65(8):1776-1792. PubMed ID: 34911393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Take-Over Performance Evaluation Model for Automated Vehicles from Automated to Manual Driving.
    Yan L; Chen J; Wen C; Wan P; Peng L; Yu X
    Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():3160449. PubMed ID: 35463280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of different takeover request interfaces on takeover behavior and performance during conditionally automated driving.
    Ou YK; Huang WX; Fang CW
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Nov; 162():106425. PubMed ID: 34601181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Behavioral Changes to Repeated Takeovers in Highly Automated Driving: Effects of the Takeover-Request Design and the Nondriving-Related Task Modality.
    Roche F; Somieski A; Brandenburg S
    Hum Factors; 2019 Aug; 61(5):839-849. PubMed ID: 30517032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling take-over performance in level 3 conditionally automated vehicles.
    Gold C; Happee R; Bengler K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():3-13. PubMed ID: 29196019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improvement of driver active interventions during automated driving by displaying trajectory pointers-A driving simulator study.
    Ono S; Sasaki H; Kumon H; Fuwamoto Y; Kondo S; Narumi T; Tanikawa T; Hirose M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S152-S156. PubMed ID: 31381449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Takeover requests for automated driving: The effects of signal direction, lead time, and modality on takeover performance.
    Huang G; Pitts BJ
    Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Feb; 165():106534. PubMed ID: 34922107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of collision warning characteristics on driving behaviors and safety in connected vehicle environments.
    Zhao W; Gong S; Zhao D; Liu F; Sze NN; Huang H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Jun; 186():107053. PubMed ID: 37030178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.