These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35786148)

  • 21. Self-generated elaboration and spacing effects on incidental memory.
    Toyota H; Kikuchi Y
    Percept Mot Skills; 2004 Dec; 99(3 Pt 2):1193-200. PubMed ID: 15739844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The spacing effect depends on an encoding deficit, retrieval, and time in working memory: evidence from once-presented words.
    Braun K; Rubin DC
    Memory; 1998 Jan; 6(1):37-65. PubMed ID: 9640432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effects of spacing and massing on children's orthographic learning.
    Wegener S; Wang HC; Beyersmann E; Nation K; Colenbrander D; Castles A
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2022 Feb; 214():105309. PubMed ID: 34753014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The spacing effect in older and younger adults: does context matter?
    Bercovitz KE; Bell MC; Simone PM; Wiseheart M
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2017 Nov; 24(6):703-716. PubMed ID: 27805865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The spacing effect in the learning of word pairs.
    Shaughnessy JJ; Zimmerman J; Underwood BJ
    Mem Cognit; 1974 Jul; 2(4):742-8. PubMed ID: 24203749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of the length of to-be-remembered lists and intervening lists on free recall: a reexamination using overt rehearsal.
    Ward G; Tan L
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Nov; 30(6):1196-210. PubMed ID: 15521798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of constant vs. varied encoding and massed vs. distributed presentations on recall of paired associates.
    Schwartz M
    Mem Cognit; 1975 Jul; 3(4):390-4. PubMed ID: 21287092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reward Learning over Weeks Versus Minutes Increases the Neural Representation of Value in the Human Brain.
    Wimmer GE; Li JK; Gorgolewski KJ; Poldrack RA
    J Neurosci; 2018 Aug; 38(35):7649-7666. PubMed ID: 30061189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effect of selective attention and a stimulus prefix on the output order of immediate free recall of short and long lists.
    Grenfell-Essam R; Ward G
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2015 Mar; 69(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 25730637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Analysis of the encoding factors that produce the negative repetition effect.
    Mulligan NW; Peterson DJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):765-75. PubMed ID: 24548323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Negative recency effects in delayed recognition: Spacing, consolidation, and retrieval strategy processes.
    Sheaffer R; Levy DA
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Nov; 50(8):1683-1693. PubMed ID: 35277835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Relearning attenuates the benefits and costs of spacing.
    Rawson KA; Dunlosky J
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Nov; 142(4):1113-29. PubMed ID: 23088488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Adults' word recall and word repetition.
    Kynette D; Kemper S; Norman S; Cheung HT
    Exp Aging Res; 1990; 16(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 2090462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of spacing repetitions on the recognition memory of young children and adults.
    Toppino TC; Kasserman JE; Mracek WA
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1991 Feb; 51(1):123-38. PubMed ID: 2010724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Learning concepts and categories: is spacing the "enemy of induction"?
    Kornell N; Bjork RA
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Jun; 19(6):585-92. PubMed ID: 18578849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Neural mechanisms of the spacing effect in episodic memory: A parallel EEG and fMRI study.
    Zhao X; Wang C; Liu Q; Xiao X; Jiang T; Chen C; Xue G
    Cortex; 2015 Aug; 69():76-92. PubMed ID: 25989444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Limitations to the spacing effect: demonstration of an inverted u-shaped relationship between interrepetition spacing and free recall.
    Verkoeijen PP; Rikers RM; Schmidt HG
    Exp Psychol; 2005; 52(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 16302534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Semantic relations and repetition of items enhance the free recall of words by multiple sclerosis patients.
    Andrade VM; Oliveira MG; Miranda MC; Oliveira AS; Oliveira EM; Bueno OF
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2003 Dec; 25(8):1070-8. PubMed ID: 14566581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Distinctiveness and priority in free recall of words.
    Schmidt CR; Schmidt SR; Wilson KA
    Memory; 2021 Jan; 29(1):21-38. PubMed ID: 33158367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Repetition and spacing effects on true and false recognition in the DRM paradigm.
    Dubuisson JB; Fiori N; Nicolas S
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Oct; 53(5):382-9. PubMed ID: 22830573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.